This is fantastic! It is a very useful tool for preservation of games on Roblox. I hope this can be used for good to save the many creative and original works on the platform in a way that we didn't with flash games.
What is the diameter of each point? Aka how localised can they determine where the lightning is? Are we to assume the centre is where the lightning is? As I can't seem to find this information which I feel would be quite useful.
The issues here are there is an assumption AI will improve so far whereby it has the capabilities to write flawless code for pieces of software that would be many separate files and many thousands of lines of code. There is very little about LLMs that suggest there is any focus on accuracy to this level or that it would be possible within any foreseeable future as we are currently are nowhere near this at all.
Secondly, we use software and AI as a human race that others have created as many are not quite aware of what they need and don't have the capabilities of designing software to solve all of the issues they have. That won't suddenly be a skillset many pick up.
I greatly question why the initial hype was ever thought of as factual and why those in the know believed they could develop at any significant pace considering it has taken LLM'S almost 40 years to get to where they are today which is inaccurate factually, useful for admin tasks level of functional. It feels as though every once in a while those in tech seem to get blinkered by the latest craze that they ignore all the warning signs from every tech company that previously over promised in a similar way.
Whilst not someone from the US, I had the same feeling in McDonald's with the original happy meals and the hamburglar. For a child from a very poor family who was on the equivalent of food stamps and without electricity occasionally, the rare McDonald's treat which I ate sat on a toadstool in the restaurant brought real joy to me. Just like the occasional arcade game I actually got to play (although even just looking at a machine without any coins to put in was special) was magical, and still remembered to this day (Virtua Striker). I think there is a real value to nostalgia and for many including me, no amount of money or extravagant trip will ever bring me as much joy as those small treats did in some really hard childhood moments, therefore keeping it around is definitely a sound business model at times.
To take this back to tech, for me it's the same reason, I have a fondness for the early days of the internet and gopher protocol websites that resemble that more closely hold such a big place in my heart.
Why exactly would anyone care about an MIT licensed project being bought? I don't blame Pocket Gamer for realising it was a waste of time putting the article. I sense they simply wanted to free marketing to go with it, but their purchase of the repo is pointless otherwise. An MIT licensed repo is meaningless as a owned product as anyone can and will do as they like with it. It's also a community where you can't get away with pretending you were remotely key in building the software up to that point.
Have we considered that the major issue is lack of investment in reservoirs and general infrastructure including power, for many years to keep up with demand.
Good point, it's similar to some extent. Although clearly the quality of the work that the people doing RLHF on the major LLMs is rather low in comparison with those volunteering at Wikipedia.
Those are two odd questions to even ask/answer as first quantum computers exist and secondly, we have them on a certain scale. I assume what they mean is at a scale to do calculations that surpass existing classical calculations.
Despite having consumed all of Wikipedia, it still can't accurately answer many questions so I don't think it's relevance or value has waned. AI has not got anywhere near becoming an encyclopedia and it never will whilst it can't say I don't know something (which Wikipedia can do) and filter the fact from the fiction, which Wikipedia does uses volunteers.
I don't feel this is quite the gotcha argument you believe it is. Your last line is indeed correct, he would still have his card, so no theft would have occurred. Just having a copy of said card is not theft. Likewise should a person use said card for a nefarious purpose, that is still not theft, that is fraud.
I'm not AI's biggest fan, but it is training it's virtual brain on images and data, just like a creative human would, yet it is just far quicker at that.
Do we need to limit scraping and learning to only free publicly available data? Therefore is a Reuters photo still not publicly available for learning style of photo, composition, lighting, even with a watermark. What you pay for is the license to reproduce the image, you can still look at them beforehand.
Whilst I understand a spinning hard disk is not really relevant in this day and age, I question changing the icon to something that doesn't particularly resemble a modern storage solution. I feel apple are moving away from clarity for the majority.
Is this an old article? They haven't consistently run on time for around a decade. The service is no better than supposedly worse trains in say the UK and is nowhere near say Korea's train system.
Until it is regulated and can pass safety tests, this is sensible. For those struggling with psychosis, or schizophrenic disorders, AI therapy could be incredibly harmful.
I get what you mean but still, it's a one off special edition. A company as big as Lenovo doesn't need to do everything for profit. I would understand if it was a new model design that could sell tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands but the T25 was a limited run, make it beautiful.
I would agree it is tiring, but how much of an issue is one slow day at work. How do you factor in that each day is such a small part of what I assume is a bigger project or goal?
But salaried jobs are not time based. They are often focused on doing a task across many months, one less productive day won't mean a significant loss financially for the company. We all have less productive days, is that a direct loss financially to the gdp? What about more productive days is that
me helping the gdp? Or does it balance out?
Fixing time wasted at an airport could be useful but it's not the biggest issue ever and I certainly wouldn't frame it as a GDP issue if we could fix it. More efficient for humans to do things they want to do with their time, not to do work instead.
Even trading time for money jobs, are not as clear as that, as often you produce far more money for the business than you get in return. So a simple addition of what your pay per hour is to the overall cost sum is still not accurate.
I would agree many aren't like that, but you can set your own deadlines and tasks and break down a big project into smaller goals. One day's difference in a big research project or when developing a piece of software is not going to change the cost or lose significant value in society or to the business. So why would that be attributed as loss in these calculations?
Because a salary is about doing the task you are employed to do, it's not about filling up every available moment or that you are slacking if you have free time one week. If an employee is able to find a quicker way to do the tasks they need to do that week than the norm, good for them as long as it means the work is done to the same standard and on time.