That's what the parent says, and what the BBC inplies, but not what the UK report says. The pilot reacted at 1300 ft. It took another few seconds of falling to recover at which point they were at 928 ft.
195 karma · joined October 18, 2017
If you read the UK Government report that is not what happened. The plane was at 1500 ft when it began to descend. At 1300 ft the warning sounds activated and the pilot reacted but it took another 300 ft of descent before the pilot was able to fully recover from the descent.
Poor reporting from the BBC.
>[A]n employer may terminate its employees at will, for any or no reason ... the employer may act peremptorily, arbitrarily, or inconsistently, without providing specific protections such as prior warning, fair procedures, objective evaluation, or preferential reassignment ... The mere existence of an employment relationship affords no expectation, protectible [sic] by law, that employment will continue, or will end only on certain conditions, unless the parties have actually adopted such terms.
Although I didn't see a specific excuse state governments are using to hide their suppliers, just that the state governments are being "secretive".
If you add a special switch, that increases costs. Why should car buyers bear extra expenses for less than 100 deaths a year?
Should we require special bathtub sensors that beep when they detects still water because hundreds of people drown in bathtubs each year?
And on your point, Z=L is not a widely accepted axiom. Per wiki,
>Although the axiom of constructibility does resolve many set-theoretic questions, it is not typically accepted as an axiom for set theory in the same way as the ZFC axioms.
Is the unreasonable portion, not the cost.
>JMPR’s risk assessment found out that based on the weight-of-evidence approach these compounds are unlikely to cause cancer in people via dietary exposure.
>the fourth-highest pay among the hundreds of companies in the S&P 500 index that have disclosed those figures.
seems to imply that it is not.