279 karma · joined June 18, 2022
It does not need to directly solve any particular problem to be overall good for consumers, by putting pressure to all those subscription based solutions… at least it’s private and does not require you to provide all your data…
you can also introduce some jitter like changing age range only once a week/month/year for everyone
- info - when this was expected and system/process is prepared for that (like automatic retry, fallback to local copy, offline mode, event driven with persistent queue etc) - warning - when system/process was able to continue but in degraded manner, maybe leaving decision to retry to user or other part of system, or maybe just relying on someone checking logs for unexpected events, this of course depends if that external system is required for some action or in some way optional - error - when system/process is not able to continue and particular action has been stopped immediately, this includes situation where retry mechanism is not implemented for step required for completion of particular action - fatal - you need to restart something, either manually or by external watchdog, you don’t expect this kind of logs for simple 5xx
But keep in mind that humans are not created in vacuum. After those two levels of computer create third level that is brain, actual programming of brain is done by other living humans.
So actual „humanity” is what persists in living population and would reset when population is culled and newborn must live and learn on their own.
Even if such newborn would live long enough to have access to things like books, computers, even sound and video records… those would be completely useless to them because they won’t even know language and skills required to use those.
And if someone is not, then they have material for blackmail
technical solutions are chosen by companies to have as much dark patterns as possible to force you to consent
companies that want to sell user data are bad guys trying to make gdpr look bad