kasumispencer2

That part is newly added after people complained.

Edit: the claimed reason of "updates" also seems to not exist in code. If the author is going to use LLM for this, the very least they can do is to ask it to check properly before publishing.

Isn't this just RNN and nearly nothing about this is actually new?

Sounds about right about something that's 124M. I trained one myself a few weeks ago and it's about the same level of being terrible.

Is there actually any difference when it's just one (1) link away? Are most of us seriously this busy that we cannot spend even half a minute on this?

> Clicked like 5 pages and never found 1 code example.

But I clicked one (1) link to the online book and found a thousand?

Welp, considering that one quick downvote, I suppose no one knows humor anymore...

Edit: changing your downvote to something else won't change that fact you know

A Slavoj Žižek-style "sticking a dildo into a fleshlight and have them do the sex for us" kind of situation, really

"Aggressive arrogant dismissal of anything except their exact view"

Man, if only someone around here had even if just an inch of self-awareness...

This blog post seriously reads like the author woke up one day, randomly decided that he/she should be angry about something, randomly decided the "buy me a coffee" links would be a good target and then proceed to conjure up some kind of ideological reasons . Unfortunately unlike the author, normal people mostly don't feel the need to be angry about every innocent little things.

You do realize when you say that you do assume they know it's an OS and by that you effectively have to regress into using the same level of argument as me just like how I assume they don't know it's an OS, right?

Ah, but at least you do know it's an OS, yes?

If this one sentence is rude in your opinion then I have very bad news for you

"Munitions"? "Intelligent distribution panel"? Look, the UNIX part might not be obvious at all, but if you somehow didn't have enough of a rough idea after seeing that many retro CPUs and systems listed below, that might say more about you than the author.

Author of the tutorial here. A newer version of this tutorial for the book I've mentioned in the introduction part can bee seen here:

https://github.com/bctnry/gentle-introduction-to-mercury

I'll write more and finish this book in the future, and I'm definitely writing my response to some of you's replies in the book.

> when it basically apparently doesn't run on laptops

i had an old laptop that runs just fine (albeit with a tiny bit of fiddling). you're free not to believe me though, it's your opinion after all.

> requires us to pretend that it's in the same class as those other OSes?

lmfao, did they ever?

shut up and get your shit together.