475 karma · joined December 28, 2010
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/mjtamlyn/improved-postg...
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16555779
"These findings demonstrate that female facial appearance holds detectable cues to reproductive health that are considered attractive by other people."
Found via http://asutriplehelix.org/node/99 which also cites some other related papers
EDIT: I really, really enjoy finding cases where something I assumed to be true is questioned on the grounds of scientific correctness. It is always a wonderful opportunity to bring my thinking closer to reality, no matter if my assumptions are true or false.
Interested to try out django vanilla views
They feel the sexism is acceptable given the circumstances. In a world where college enrollment for women is significantly higher than enrollment for men I don't agree, and I think many others don't agree either.
:)
http://eviltrout.com/2013/06/15/ember-vs-angular.html
It's great to make the decision to focus on simplicity over scope - that's a good, defensible choice and I don't think anyone here will fault you for it. But an honest understanding of the extra features you gave up to make that choice will go a long way.
Surely you're not seriously suggesting that this was in any shape or form acceptable behavior by the state.