1,060 karma · joined December 12, 2014
It demands a yes/no answer and thus always appears to be an admission of guilt. Your question leaves it open to answer any way you like.
The excitement died, the brilliance faded and now I just want a headphone socket and a music player that isn't trying to sell me a paid service I don't want.
So if I pay for petrol with a card and also buy donuts and coffee the bank and the shop cannot market to me according to what I bought, but if I join a loyalty card scheme then I'm opting in and the shop can, but not the bank.
In Norway btw, where govt. are strict about this sort of thing.
Explaining away doesn't explain. For an average, normal FB user, this was as scientific as they could get. It would be nice to see someone repeat the experiment with a pro-hacker type on hand and a packet sniffer ++.
There are too many people giving a company like fb, who have form on the implementation of morally and ethically dubious practices, the benefit of the doubt, all the while dismissing any and all claims of users. It looks fishy at best, and I'm not name calling, it isn't allowed on this forum, but there are a disproportionate number of FB defenders popping up wherever this story surfaces.
COBOL isn't so bad when you use a modern variant that purposefully deals with many of the complaints surrounding it.
Looks like this is a feature, not a bug, or else it would have been fixed sometime in the last 8 years! /s
It can be very useful if you want to 'read' something while looking at something else, like a game.
Yes, you can remap and fiddle to make it work but that isn't the point, the point is to pay the same price, sometimes more than Americans and get the same value and experience. Instead we get an inferior experience that requires hacks. Not good at all.
edit: My question is that when you have a company that has a track record, why do government contracts and private enterprise keep begging on the same street corner, instead of looking for work elsewhere, that is to say, why do they keep going back to Windows and not invest elsewhere as investment would lead to an acceptable (to them) enterprise Linux (Red Hat++ exists!)
http://www.modernmann.co.uk/new/2017/2/28/43-the-impossible-...
I'm soon to be audio free, no auxiliary input on the car's system and FM is being turned off this month in Norway. So, silence from now on aside from the gibbering emanating from my very own pie-hole.
Isn't there also something nice about driving along with only the faint glow of green or blue from the dashboard, not the 46" screen that Tesla have 'tastefully' mounted in the dash?
I was talking about work as a professional developer. We can all 'make a site', there exists any number of solutions for that, CMSes like Wordpress, Drupal etc don't count in this argument unless _you_ wrote Wordpress or Drupal from the ground up. Being a wordpress hack isn't being a developer. You won't ever be asked to write something straightforward in enterprise, you'll need to know at least HTML5 & CSS & angular 1.0 & 2+ (or similar) & docker & gulp/grunt & backend & databases & jenkins & MVC & node/npm & version control & bootstrap (or similar) and and and.
99% of sites outside of a company that makes real money and doesn't just serve a page are sites that aren't what developers actually do at work.
Browsers should make it much easier to manage cookies and privacy than they currently do. Even just getting the average user, including lazy old me, to go into settings and look through a long list of cryptically named gibberish in order to remove everything to do with facebook every time my SO has used the family PC is a chore. So much so in fact that I keep a PC from which my SO is banned. It's my Linux island.
HN users would do well to keep this in mind the next time they are singing MS's praises about how MS are embracing open source and becoming the savior of all things programming.
Comedy aside, CSS isn't the problem, but if an experienced web-dev can't make a site without learning for 5+ years and then feel like they have no knowledge of web development then we have a problem, and that's where we are now.
The problem with the long list of frameworks and libraries available is that there is no easy way to make a web2.0 site without years and years of learning and then the resulting site is a mish-mash of what works without it being easy to maintain. Sitting here looking at .NET & angularjs 1.x and wondering where it all went wrong (actually, not the.,NET part, that seems to work).