1,493 karma · joined October 24, 2011
The 2nd one seems dubious to me: in my experience, people are moving to remote-friendly jobs from within the US...it doesn't explain why we have a shortage of people making pizza.
The last one is the one I'm struggling with: I don't knock people at ALL for making those choices, but if they're struggling to survive and (as others have noted in response to me) unemployment insurance has ended, what are they doing instead of taking a job?
I'm not a GOPer, but I do hold some fairly free market beliefs, so I wanted to answer your question about the general case. I think some of this thinking comes from the fact that there's been a lot of legislation in the past that attempts to solve market "failures" with more government regulation or subsidies, and that those promises have fallen short. In my mind, there are a lot of liberals in the US who say things like "if only the stimulus was larger" or e.g. after the "assault weapon" ban failed to demonstrably change gun violence in the US that we "just needed to ban MORE guns".
For me, the big one on this is healthcare. I'm the first to admit that a single-payer healthcare system is my 2nd favorite system after a purely free market approach, but there's a lot of gaslighting going on that what we have today in the US is actually a free market approach. Liberals tell me that the free market failed, and that it's time to socialize healthcare. But from where I'm sitting, we've had massive governement intervention in healthcare for a century, and that intervention has made the market aspect of our system fail completely, govt subsidies for employer-provided insurance being the number one (inflates prices by increasing demand for lower-pri care, ties people to their employer for longer than they'd otherwise do), but also Medicare/Medicaid and the lack of insurance pools across state lines.
This debate falls out most cleanly when you debate the Laffer Curve. Are we on the left of optimum, or the right? There's really no way for us to know for sure in a vacuum, but "doubling down" is the only approach that either side can really take in pushing increased or decreased tax rates.
Obviously, I didn't flesh out all my positions here, and I don't mean to get into a debate on any of these things in particular. I'm just trying to help explain some of my own logic in response to your question.
I'm not an expert in this field, but that naively seems like it would achieve the same result. Obviously there's a conversation to be had about fair wages, and whether a minimum wage is livable, but is there something else here that I'm missing about why that wouldn't also mitigate the current labor shortage?
E.g. see Project Slippi[1], a patch for playing Melee online with rollback netcode.
Interestingly, a tournament using was Slippi was issued a C&D[2], but Nintendo has issued C&Ds to Melee tournaments in the past just for using their graphics and making money and stuff.
[1]: https://slippi.gg/
[2]: https://twitter.com/TheBigHouseSSB/status/132952108157785703...
And also you might care because we're on a forum full of developers knee deep in a thread and walled gardens and their relation to customer architectures, and it might be relevant to that thread that code that's common to every other Firefox platform target isn't as common on iOS.
3000 series is a huge performance boost, reasonably priced (at least at MSRP), and gives comfortable buffer on lots of scenarios like high-end VR, 1440p at very high FPS, and comfy 4K with all the good stuff turned up.
Meanwhile, the GTX 1080 was cheap and could basically play everything at 1080p. I think gamers just skipped over the 2000 because it was lame.
But hell, I hope you're right. I'm still rocking a 980, and I've not had any success trying to grab a 3070 to upgrade. Maybe these LHRs will actually free stuff up. (But to be honest, the 980 is still doing fine with most of what I play at 1080p.)
I thought it was crazy how many of these turned out to be mostly right (even if the explicit stuff about mergers and lawsuits was wrong)
I've been given the flexibility to define my own schedule with regards to when I'm in the office and when I'm working from home. I can't WAIT to go back: it's great having a dedicated work space, I like hallway conversations and in-person meetings, and it'll be AWESOME to be able to snag a hot meal at our cafeteria without having to prep or think about it.
BUT, I'll probably never go in for a Friday ever again, and realistically I'll be working from home 2-3 days/week.
So yes, I feel very fortunate my employer is extending that flexibility post-COVID.
I was really excited to be accepted into the beta, but ultimately didn't want to move stuff to GitHub just for CF Pages.
[1]: https://community.cloudflare.com/t/cloudflare-pages-with-git...
It's....not great.
Piracy set the price at 0, Spotify pulled the price up from there, but there is literally nothing stopping consumers today from paying more for music except that they don't want to.
In many ways, it reminds me of the Web 0.x days on which the HN crowd so frequently reminisces.
That's my only gripe. The rest of the app is incredible, and absolutely the most delightful app I use every day. I cite it often as an example of a native app that beats the pants off of anything Electron-based, it's just so damn fast.
IANAL, but in the US at least, I think every person would need to buy their own Switch and dump the software themselves for it to be even remotely legal.
As for the decentralization aspect: I think a lot of people in countries outside of the US would disagree with you that trust is not a problem with the banking system. Not everyone out there can just get a credit card with 2% cashback that's backed by the rule of law I enjoy in the US.
I think you've also sidestepped the issue of inflation. Just because the American public hasn't yet learned that their money's value is being printed away doesn't mean that they're not going to be the ones feeling the hurt in 5-20 years, particularly if UBI et al don't keep pace with their decrease in purchasing power.
I saw another one of your comments allude to the idea that democracy is a solution to this, but I don't ascribe to the idea that we should shirk technology solutions because political ones might exist. In many cases, technological innovation drives demand for political action. I don't want to debate the merits of Uber as a company, but I think it's hard to ignore the idea that the introduction of car-hailing apps created demand for governments to completely rethink taxi monopolies.
Ultimately, I'm not trying to make a case for Bitcoin. I'm trying to make a case for the idea that the adoption of and furor around Bitcoin is going to significantly influence the vNext of our banking system, even if that just means e.g. that the near-instant clearing of large Bitcoin transactions is showing folks that ACH is garbage, or that T+1 stock settlement is achievable.
And even if my specifics are wrong, my point is that some technology may be impossible to leapfrog because we build on the innovations and rollout of past technology in order to innovate further.
And again, you can debate that modern electric cars could have been more capable earlier if we had distributed more towards innovation than to rollout of old tech (e.g. would a carbon tax on gas cars 20 years ago that went towards battery research have accelerated us towards our current position more quickly?). But my uber-point is that gas cars were probably required for some period of the last century. Maybe even to make, like, internet, smartphones, and all kinds of stuff
I move USD from my checking account into my investment accounts in order to buy equities, and I do that more when the Federal Reserve is pumping more liquidity into the market via low interest rates. There are many folks out there using e.g. TSLA as an inflation hedge (which is why it has a P/E > 1000) because they know that USDs will decline in value as liquidity keeps getting pumped.
If we're all using a decentralized currency like Bitcoin with a fixed inflation rate, you're going to see a lot more sanity and price stability in the equities markets.
I see Bitcoin as the Model T of new currency models. Decentralization is the future of currency and contracts, even if Bitcoin itself is wasteful and inefficient as a v1 product.
I'm looking to avoid learning Vim plugins (again...again), setting up an environment, and learning keybindings for sidebars, filenav, etc...
Am I just being lazy in learning the Vim plugin system? Are there pretty Vim frontends now that render all nicely like Ghostwriter et al?