58 karma · joined September 15, 2013
Which metric do we use to define success here? Can shitty software be considered successful just because everyone uses it?
[1] http://www.amazon.com/Oliver-Heaviside-Electrical-Genius-Vic...
Somebody at Bloomberg is obviously a little confused about FPGAs.
Inevitably reminds me of this: http://html9responsiveboilerstrapjs.com/
I understand MVC, but what is reactive meta-programming exactly?
I would think yes, otherwise we would all be sticking with mining precious metals.
Full disclosure: OP is the Design & Product advisor for this company
Edit: adjusting the density of the initial map seems to result in different patterns appearing in the output
How does bot A simulate bot B that must simulate bot A to determine its answer? Seems like infinite trampoline recursion.
EDIT: it seems you run the simulation against a different bot implementation than the running one and attempt to determine its characteristics given the responses and the known behaviour of the other implementation.