3,533 karma · joined July 7, 2016
I'm going to have to stop you there.
A little about me, I was a college dropout and worked as a mechanic for a few years, then went back and completed my undergrad, got a Master's and I've been white collar for a couple of decades, but I've always done as much work on my car myself as possible.
20 years ago we used to call the dealership service department the "stealership." I'm afraid nothing has changed.
I normally won't let the Toyota dealer lay even a finger on my car but I recently had some recall work done (fuel pump). I also asked them to look at another issue since the car was there and they presumably had the specialized equipment and knowledge to diagnose a tricky automatic transmission problem.
Well they couldn't even replicate the problem, even though I left detailed instructions on how to reproduce (yay bug reporting experience!). I watched the test drive on my dashcam and he didn't do what I said.
Worse, they messed up the recall repair and left equipment in my car. I told them it was probably the sending unit. They diagnosed the car for over 6 hours, checking everything BUT the sending unit, before finally giving in and realizing it was indeed the sending unit (it's the fancy name for a float in the gas tank). It took them another 4 hours to finally fix it.
I was left without my car for two full days for a repair that they told me was a 3-hour job.
Never, EVER take your car to the dealership EVER once your car is out of warranty. I have friends that used to have car dealerships in the family. They don't make much money on the sale of cars, the service department is under intense pressure to generate most of the profits for the dealership. They will lie, cheat, and steal to get your money. I cannot stress this enough. STAY AWAY FROM AUTOMOTIVE DEALERSHIP SERVICE DEPARTMENTS.
The average HN reader, with a little internet searching and some common sense, is better equipped to diagnose cars than a dealership.
I wonder if that's the closest that real archeologists will get to Indiana Jones style adventures.
1) Pilot thinks there may be damage/malfunction and does a low pass so that the Tower/Ground Ops staff can have a look. This was evident in a recent one I saw where the pilot had a nose gear fault. It took two passes, but they were able to confirm that the nose gear was NOT down and were still able to have a successful landing.
2) Student pilot either has mechanical issue or in-plane pilot becomes incapacitated. Tower/remote instructor tells student to do multiple low, slow passes at increasingly lower altitudes and speeds to get used to taking the proper heading and control inputs until the final pass is so low/slow that the landing essentially happens naturally.
I'd be flabbergasted if the FAA bans this type of thing, in both of these cases I personally saw (and I'm sure many others), this procedure saved lives. Why would they ban this?
What we need is an incentive for the O&G companies to be squeaky clean and to rat each other out.
Align the incentives.
So what's better, getting your throat spit up your nose, or getting your nose mucus in your throat?
As far as I can tell from some of my automation, the outage started between 1 and 1:15pm Eastern and the outage was "fixed" between 3:15 and 3:30 pm.
I say "fixed" because we're still seeing lots of slowness in the API responses.
I cannot state enough how much I love it. It's both an art and a science. It involves danger. It's exciting. The community is absolutely insanely great. It allows me to progress both through ladders set up by organizations, and by my own recording of lap times. I can compete as hard as I want or I can just go out there and turn laps at 7/10 and no one cares.
It happens.
Doesn't scaling take time, though? Doesn't downloading a new docker container definition and starting it take at least as long as initializing a new lambda function?
Also with lambda there's no configuring to do for scaling. If anything lambda gives you tools to limit the concurrency.
I think this is a little overstated. The cloud provider wants their customers to be happy while minimizing costs (and therefore costs to the customer). It's not truly a perverse incentive scenario.
Also this article isn't even about a tokamak so...