Tesla sends untrained employees to work on cars as service becomes problematic
electrek.co
electrek.co
It took a a year to get my Model X into an "acceptable" state, and it still has seven outstanding issues, six of which they simply refuse to fix.
If I wanted to get another service appointment now I would have to wait at least a month, and if they decide they're actually going to try to fix something (they often refuse), they keep it for at least a week and no, you don't get a loaner car in return.
It is an absolute disaster and I would recommend no-one ever buy a Tesla simply for this reason.
Here's the full list of issues with my car: https://ibb.co/VJJdNVk
(Thanks for the suggestion of imgbb)
I'm not, but that doesn't change what they think.
I have plenty of other reasons to get rid of the car anyway. This one is just a bonus.
I see. Musk being an asshole attracts assholes who act like assholes towards you for your choice of car. I have to admit that would also be a factor in me wanting to sell a Tesla if I owned one.
CEOs loose their mojo. When Elon fails to follow-through with taking Tesla private, and (seemingly) acquiring Twitter -- its a sign that he isn't thoroughly thinking through the weightiest of decisions.
No one likes giving money to assholes. And to be fair, he is doing a pretty good job at revealing himself as one.
this looks like it's referring to recent actions. in my opinion, musks actions in the past year (including the past week or so) have been far, far more acceptable than those in the past decade
My problem with Musk is who he is getting politically aligned with, for several very close reasons.
Everyone else is disagreeing with you, but I'll take a different tack:
Why shouldn't his behavior be a factor?
CEOs set company strategy and drive execution.
Mr. Musk is the largest individual shareholder.
I also wouldn't want to be funding a future political play by Musk by buying a Tesla now.
I believe there have been problems at Tesla and Musk was known to sometimes lose himself against his employees. Didn't seem to interest anyone and they still bought the cars.
For a company that can become a problem too when customers are seen as assholes.
Luxury items function significantly and social signals. Associate the brands with things potential buyers don't want to be associated with, and those buyers won't want to buy (or display) them. Tesla has benefitted from Musk’s image when it was less partisanly political and more “To Mars!”; his recent shift may shift where the brand has appeal.
[1] https://www.axios.com/2022/05/26/brands-politics-axios-harri...
One person's impact is the reason for Tesla, no?
However, the AP, formerly, in less advanced cars, allowed the car to change lanes with a simple operation of the turn signal -- all the while, maintaining position in the new lane, and adjusting for traffic aware cruise control. Now, the '22 model S, at least, you are forced to deactivate autopilot with a lane change. I'm now starting to think that there is no specification for autopilot, and every model year it will operate differently (worse) than prior model years.
A lot of people do like it though!
Hyundai, who lied about MPG and had to pay hundred of millions in fines? Whose chairman was arrested and convicted for bribery and embezzlement and had to spend several years in prison and fined over a billion dollars?
Kia, who had severe issues with engine fires that they failed to recall, and only became public after a whistleblower told them? That had to pay over $100 million in fines? That caused over 5000 fires and 158 injuries and several deaths?
Where are your standards for the leadership for these other companies?
People love to talk about their morals and not giving money to support things they see as evil but when push comes to shove and it’s time to make a purchase, 99% just throw that out the window. I mean people are still dancing to Michael Jackson’s music at their weddings.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaeltaylor/2020/09/15/merced...
warning: awful forbes website
As much as I'd love this to be true (and it should be), I have yet to buy a newly manufactured vehicle that didn't have to go back to the dealership for something at least once... often more than once.
I don't think it's entirely fair to lay that aspect at Tesla's feet. It is fair, however, to expect better and more timely service in getting those repairs made.
This has to be close to qualifying for lemon law status?
California lemon laws require a car to be in service for at least 30 days in the first 18 months.
The established auto manufacturers have a long standing pattern of paying lip service to electric vehicles. General motors went so far as to reclaim, disable, crush, and/or shred virtually every model of the EV1, the first mass-produced and purpose-designed electric vehicle of the modern era. [1]. The manner in which GM created barriers to entry for electric vehicles with the EV1 program is the stuff of legend. [2]
TSLA has been the most shorted stock in history, with close to $57 billion being lost by short sellers between 2010 and 2021. [3]. That entrenched economic forces want Tesla ended is no secret.
The mass adoption of electric vehicles was Elon's stated goal with Tesla, and it looks like that is well on its way to being accomplished.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Motors_EV1
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Who_Killed_the_Electric_Car
[3] https://qz.com/1979325/tesla-not-gamestop-is-the-most-shorte...
> That entrenched economic forces want Tesla ended is no secret.
Literally a conspiracy theory.
A conspiracy theory to have your stock undermined with unsurpassed short selling? Or for the president to hold an "EV Summit" and not even invite the company with the most US electric-car sales (74% over the past three years) who were recently dubbed the "most American-made"? [1]
[1] https://www.businessinsider.com/tesla-beats-ford-as-most-ame...
When several of my Tesla-owning cow-orkers reported waiting six months for things like body panels, I resolved not to buy one.
My BMW took at least a couple of years before I ran into problems.
A new vehicle shouldn't have any problems for at least a couple of years, period.
“Price, quality, manufacturing at scale. Pick two.”
Ok, that’s a little flippant. But the underlying truth is that quality for software and manufactured goods is one of many variables that can be dialled up or down at the expense of other variables.
(Well, maybe not price right now because the entire car market is insane.)
So my claim is that Honda and Toyota provide high value by balancing a low-ish (but not the lowest) price against high quality.
https://www.autoguide.com/auto-news/2016/01/toyota-tops-fiat...
To get a feel for the actual statistics, a very useful trick I came across on a Porsche forum is to look up the model on cargurus.com. E.g.:
https://www.cargurus.com/Cars/inventorylisting/viewDetailsFi...
Note the number of listings (401 nationwide listings for the Taycan at the moment) shown in the 'Filter Results' area. Scroll down to 'Vehicle History' and note the availability of the option to 'Hide vehicles with Lemon History Reported.' Next to that is a number reflecting how many used cars of a given make/model have a lemon title out of the set of cars currently for sale. With a 25:401 ratio, it can be inferred that almost 6% of used Taycans on the market were bought back by Porsche at some point.
I'd even go as far to say that the majority of a 1-2 year old car model will still be with the original purchaser.
I guess all that can be said with any certainty is that the proportion of lemons could be as bad as 6% or as good as 0.1% (if the ones for sale on Carguru at the moment happen to include all of the lemons ever produced.)
There's no way a modern Kia or Hyundai would appear anywhere near the same level as on that list (and definitely not below any American car company or Fiat or Volkswagon).
And how could that take in account how often brands are talked about in general.
Considering the founders of a few other car companies have said or done truly horrible things[0][1], I'm curious what Elon has said that is so beyond the pale.
[0]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Ford#Antisemitism_and_Th...
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volkswagen#1939%E2%80%931944:_...
I've often used imgbb[1], which is free, requires a direct link to view images, and has the option to expire URL's at your choosing.
Of course if you're going to post it to HackerNews that's very public so be sure to redact anything you don't want the world to see.
I expect tens of thousands of Tesla fans will eat this up, quit their jobs, and go work for free at Tesla to help "train the neural net". TSLA stock will improve drastically as Musk will be able to fire the entire factory floor, replace them with volunteers, and labour costs will be greatly reduced.
If the car hasn't been a good one, so be it. But if you let your personal politics color your life's view, you're going to have a tumultuous life.
The real nail in the coffin was that they dropped mobile service in our area. I had a to replace the 12v battery, tried to do it myself, could not get parts.
The nearest service center is a 6-8hr roundtrip for me, more than happy to pay for mobile service but they didn't offer it any more.
Either way the shift to EVs has happened, with the F150 lightning and other offerings Tesla has largely achieved one of the main reasons we were an earlier adopter.
Issues from your list like “tesla mobile app incorrectly identifies car as 100D” and “Autopilot down chime is distorted” are rightfully lower priority than things like brakes not working properly. Most people (including me) would not even notice most of these things on your list. I am not surprised you had to wait a while for those things to get fixed, I have a feeling you’re going to also be disappointed with your next vehicle.
I mean these are things that might need improvement, but to me a car transports me from A to B. Given, I also don't pay much for them.
Dealers are terrible awful places to buy a car but they’re generally excellent at fixing cars quickly. Sure, they’re very expensive but they also have most parts available for a their brands and an army of techs available.
As Teslas age, there’s going to be an army of technicians needed to fix them. This is going to be 100% Tesla’s problem and is going to eat into margins in significant ways.
One that I know is rumored is a 1st party Radar sensor that is supposed to be coming soon, which would be them replacing the Continental radars that exist on older models. There's also battery changes, with the biggest being the LFP batteries on the new SR 3. I wouldn't necessarily categorize that under "swapping out" but testing out a new chemistry that will likely go fleet-wide at some point.
One of the big things they wanted to do was create a lower cost model (3/Y) by trying to reuse as many parts and moulds as possible between the two, so I'd actually be surprised to hear of a lot of part substitution since it goes directly against that logic.
In terms of their MCU, they are at V3, with each being a generational improvement over the last (Tegra to Intel Atom to Ryzen) and not related to the chip shortages. In terms of their AP computers, same thing, they had AP1 which was Mobileye rebranded, AP2, 2.5 and 3 which were each major changes to add computing power.
This is mainly how the major established car manufacturers make money. Soon same should be true for Tesla as well, as their fleet ages.
But I mean, if the dealership is the manufacturer, then you definitely have a bigger conflict of interest as far as repairs go.
They hadn't even read the code right and wouldn't have even been replacing a part relevant to it.
I'm not saying Tesla service is great, just to be clear, just that the bar is often really low.
Oh, come on. They certainly are not. Pick any rapidly growing car model of the last six or seven decades (the Prius in 2005-08 comes to mind, Outbacks in the 90's, etc...) and you'll discover a flood of service problems reported.
Tesla is having trouble scaling service because it turns out service might be harder to scale than factories.
And one way you address that is by hiring more people to do service, which is exactly what is being reported here. The idea that these are "untrained" (!!!) employees is pure spin. These are, fundamentally, new employees, brought on[1] to service cars. And, duh, they're going to have to be trained before they can be useful. There isn't the remotest hint of an allegation anywhere in that article that Tesla was skipping training for service employees. It's all spin.
Anti-Tesla headlines are an eyeball magnet. There was one going around a few days ago about something like 300 autopilot accidents had been identified by the NTSB (or NHTSA?), failing to note that if that holds up it represents an accident rate something like 6% of the average passenger car.
[1] Albeit as transfers from other departments.
Note that for pretty much all other automakers, "training" means something more than a few minutes watching a video. It means actual reading, instruction, and supervised hands-on exercises.
A "new" Ford service technician will have several hundreds of hours of training, and most automakers will further certify technicians so that customers know that the person working on their car actually knows what they're doing.
A "new" Tesla technician might have almost an hour. It's great that they're "starting somewhere" but it sucks for the customers whose service will be fucked up by someone who has no business handling paid, unsupervised service calls.
The fantasy that BEVs are 'much simpler' than ICE vehicles has confused a lot of people. The reality is that the complex electronics, battery management systems etc can only be worked on by Tesla techs with access to DRM protected diagnostics and restricted access online workshop manuals. All modern vehicles, whether ICE, hybrid or BEV are incredibly complex so fewer and fewer people can or want to work on them.
This is a huge problem going forward for everyone. We need to get back to the VW Beetle/Golf etc era where it was possible for even a knowledgable owner could perform major repairs on the vehicle they own, and which were bread and butter for local mechanic shops
This sounds like a problem Tesla created for itself, unnecessarily.
Aptera is taking the opposite approach: https://aptera.us/right-to-repair-commitment-feat-rich-rebui...
As Teslas Age | Gruber Motors
Please never say "back to the VW" and "Beetle" in the same sentence. They're shoehorned together in the worst of ways.
If we're going to go back to the Beetle era where it was easy to work on, I think you have to go back pretty far. That's probably too old for most people.
Completely different than a Golf or Jetta the same years, which usually allows you to get to whatever you'd like. If not, at least the service position let's you yank the engine quick.
I'm thinking back really hard, but I don't know if I've ever looked around a 50's/60's Beetle more than a quick glance. If they built a new electric car as cheap and easy as those supposedly were to work on, I'd be very interested.
Well sure. It’s just the state of the world. I’d expect a Tesla owner to be someone who can handle repairs having to be re-done. They are luxury cars, after all.
For reference, I’ve owned several Teslas and none of them have been at the level of fit and finish appropriate for their price. All of them have needed some finicky part or another fixed under warranty.
The cars, though… they’re just so much fun to drive that all of that doesn’t really matter to me.
I don’t agree that is a huge problem going forward for everyone. I think it’s something that will work itself out given the incentives that Tesla has to get their act together. And it’s not really a problem for the vast majority of owners, who have other options for transport while their car is repaired.
Teslas are not Corollas. Teslas are not “EVs for the Everyman” no matter what Elon says.
I’m not interested in picking up a wrench and working on my own car. I don’t mind that Tesla is sending out newbies to work on cars because I’ll just keep taking it back until I’m satisfied. But, you also couldn’t pay me to go to a traditional dealership.
Why is it any more amazing than taking a random person off the street[1] and have them service cars?
What you're doing is exactly what the author of the linked article wants you to do: you're taking the frame from the headline (that the new servicefolk won't be trained before working on cars) as a prior and assuming it to be true, despite that fact that this isn't alleged anywhere in the article.
> A "new" Ford service technician will have several hundreds of hours of training
It's not hundreds of hours. These people get trained, but you can start on stuff like tire replacements or diagnostic reading after a day or two. Not every service is replacing a cylinder or rebuilding a transmission!
[1] A "new employee", in the jargon.
Really? In the experience of myself and my friends, dealer repair is at best hit-and-miss and at worst feels downright dishonest... most of the people I know who felt "in the know" always used third-party repair people that they trusted.
> As Teslas age, there’s going to be an army of technicians needed to fix them.
This just means you need to hire people, not that those people need to be hired at arm's-length by third-party related businesses. Tesla has buildings where people work in them all over the world, just like Toyota. Their location near where I live looks just like a normal car dealer because it used to be a Buick dealership. They have a service center full of technicians, they are simply hired by Tesla.
Taking a step back this is like insisting that companies like Panda Express, Starbucks, or Chipotle can't ever compete with franchises because obviously they are going to have to hire a billion people to cook and serve the food... well, you just hire them! To me the only thing that franchises are inherently good at doing is helping to fleece unsuspecting franchise purchasers with bad models.
> Sure, they’re very expensive but they also have most parts available for a their brands and an army of techs available.
And this is the real problem: Tesla as a company doesn't even have the parts available to make NEW cars right now (Musk has even been talking about pausing new orders as they have cars sitting all over the place just a few parts shy of being ready for pick up ;P) much less repair OLD cars, and their demand scaling up both processes at once is of course going to be hard.
And like, to be clear: maybe their current lack of service people is inexcusable and incompetent... but this has nothing to do with being "dealer-free".
Agree. I use dealers since they are the ones who provide authorized recall repairs. Otherwise, I go to the local, independent for much faster & cheaper service.
Dealerships have a really bad reputation so they are sometimes called stealerships.
Which is part of the puzzle people are seemingly missing.
Get rid of dealerships - and you're stuck with the manufacturer's service - for better or worse.
Don't like that one particular dealership? Go to a different one... Unless you live in the middle of no where, you likely have at least two or more dealerships for your car's make within a reasonable distance. Find one that treats you right - for both service and sales.
That's not true at all. Independent mechanics service cars, including almost most gas stations.
My understanding is that all work has to be done by Tesla to keep OTA updates.
The same probably applies for Tesla. I cannot afford one myself, but I imagine that a certain % of people get excellent service or no problems at all, and another percent like comment OP get many problems and then whoever they're dealing with probably shrugs and says, well, most of our customers never had any issue, we'll just drag this guy along. It sucks and these businesses that earn such huge margins on EVs should strive to dig into their pockets and deliver better customer service. For me personally, it's the treatment of that last percent of customers who are outliers and have rare issues that's very influential of how much I trust a company.
They've always got the work done within a day and if they think it's going to run over, they give me a loaner no questions asked and tell me to come back at my convenience in a few days time. Conversations typically run along the lines of "I talked to the mechanic who saw your car last time and he's confident on his time estimate. He's suggested doing x while he does y, as it's really only going to be a parts cost as he's stripping x off in the process of doing y, and it'll need doing in x months anyway, but it's up to you".
Anything they want to raise to my attention, they send me a simple clear video with a mechanic clearly describing/visually highlighting the problem(s), how long they think it's safe to leave to be fixed and have an open discussion with me about what I want to do and when I want to do it. I literally can't fault them. It's certainly dealer specific - I researched where to go on a UK car forum, and found out the nearest dealership seems like an absolute shit show of basically scamming customers, so I travel a bit further out and haven't been disappointed (yet).
[1]: one of recent examples - Gears & Gadgets f150 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3UCnYeiYY9g
[2]: broken motor at bronco: 50 days in service, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SB-ZV-7JVeY
It's an anecdote, of course, but the solution 11 months later was to buy another car. You can bet it wasn't a Hyundai.
I've had a dealer claim that my car wasn't covered by a manufacturer engine warranty extension when it plainly was. That was after struggling for a long time to get them to acknowledge the fix that was needed.
Dealers are often not good at all at fixing problems. Ironically, one of the big problems with Tesla service is that they've copied the "that's in spec" mantra of a lot of dealers.
3rd party repair shops are generally going to be the better way to go and from an outside perspective, the two flaws in Tesla’s service model are 1) not producing & distributing enough parts, and 2) not partnering with more repair centers to train and certify technicians to work on Teslas.
I'm going to have to stop you there.
A little about me, I was a college dropout and worked as a mechanic for a few years, then went back and completed my undergrad, got a Master's and I've been white collar for a couple of decades, but I've always done as much work on my car myself as possible.
20 years ago we used to call the dealership service department the "stealership." I'm afraid nothing has changed.
I normally won't let the Toyota dealer lay even a finger on my car but I recently had some recall work done (fuel pump). I also asked them to look at another issue since the car was there and they presumably had the specialized equipment and knowledge to diagnose a tricky automatic transmission problem.
Well they couldn't even replicate the problem, even though I left detailed instructions on how to reproduce (yay bug reporting experience!). I watched the test drive on my dashcam and he didn't do what I said.
Worse, they messed up the recall repair and left equipment in my car. I told them it was probably the sending unit. They diagnosed the car for over 6 hours, checking everything BUT the sending unit, before finally giving in and realizing it was indeed the sending unit (it's the fancy name for a float in the gas tank). It took them another 4 hours to finally fix it.
I was left without my car for two full days for a repair that they told me was a 3-hour job.
Never, EVER take your car to the dealership EVER once your car is out of warranty. I have friends that used to have car dealerships in the family. They don't make much money on the sale of cars, the service department is under intense pressure to generate most of the profits for the dealership. They will lie, cheat, and steal to get your money. I cannot stress this enough. STAY AWAY FROM AUTOMOTIVE DEALERSHIP SERVICE DEPARTMENTS.
The average HN reader, with a little internet searching and some common sense, is better equipped to diagnose cars than a dealership.
After a quick oil change place put the wrong oil in my car, the service center got my entire engine warranty replaced.
They regularly wave diagnostic fees, fix little extras for free, and are incredibly pleasant to deal with.
The Kia dealership itself is terrible, trying to buy a car from there is literally insulting at times.
That they cover a rental car for the duration of however long they have my car is a nice extra that independent repair shops don't offer.
Never again. Thankfully, that crummy location is out of business for whatever reason.
So it really varies by location.
They've had the same head of their Kia service department for over a decade.
Reputation matters.
Then I got a model 3 and for the last 3 years I’ve only had to do 2 things: replace tires and have a sensor in the driver’s seat replaced which was done quickly and for free. I am never going back to ICE.
Dealerships for the most part take care of this. They aren't selling people broken cars because if they do, it becomes their problem.
In fact, service and part supply are a huge reason mature car companies are profitable at all.
Telsa controlling the both in house rather then sharing profits with dealers is a gigantic advantage.
The only problem is that while you are growing most of the cars are under warrenty most of the time. Therefore service is hugly negative. Tesla is only now getting to the point where service doesnt lose a huge amount of money.
So its literally the exact opposite of what you suggested.
The main reason Tesla has such problem is because of their growth. Any other startup car company even with dealer model would also face many of those challanges. But those companies wouldn't in the end get all the profits.
Tons of cars from other manufacturers often have similar issues from the factory, eg The Stellantis (Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram) family supposedly has one lemon every 100k cars produced[0] and that's only if the issue isn't fixed within 3 visits to the dealership's auto repair shop.
Wtf are you on? At most 1 in ten million people who buy Tesla will experience this? So, considering that Tesla has sold significantly less that that, do you think all those reports have secretly just been from one person?
> the main concern is reducing the metric of “next available appointment,”
Later on the article talks about how short sellers have been using that metric to gauge service levels, which Tesla wants to undermine. So it looks like the company is explicitly targeting a vanity metric as a knee jerk response to short sellers. Not the best long term strategy...
At some point it may catch up to them & they'll have to do something about it, but by then it may be too late to avoid major damage to the company. The fact that it hasn't hurt them yet might make it even worse: it may mean leadership stays in denial over the problem even longer past the point of keeping it manageable.
I do suspect we will have a base on the Moon and maybe a little space tourism long before we do anything more than a small not-to-stay trip to Mars. The rocket is only a small part of the tech tree to settle a planet 6mos journey away. The moon is only about three days and there is a daily launch window.
That being said I’m also well aware that Gwynne Shotwell and numerous others are at least as responsible. He gets some but by no means all credit.
I also give Tesla immense credit for helping tip EVs, though I am less bullish on them by far than SpaceX. They seem to be very different companies.
But he evidently can't.
Getting back would be much harder challanges.
But his goal is for many people to go there.
And then 5 years later people are angry he didnt deliver.
I really dont understand why people keep brining this up.
And as for Mars, nobody can deny that what Musk is doing with SpaceX is getting us closer to that then we have ever been. I dont think any fan of space flight would disagree.
I dont know of any. Are you calling Geely or BYD new? And and they are not that much larger kn scale.
So please, show me the sources.
Beyond that, there is also XPeng and NIO, which aren't as large in scale ad Tesla, but are scaling significantly faster than Tesla did and are much much younger and definitely qualify as "at scale".
So, clearly, scaling a new car company isn't something Tesla was the only one to do in its era.
Tesla revenue: 53,823
BYD revenue: 32’173
And XPeng and NIO started way later when much of the groundwork for EV was already laid and the government in China had a gigantic push to establish EV in the country.
So yeah, the only company that is comparable, BYD is one of the most amazing companies of China and Tesla has done better on global scale.
I disagree that Tesla has done better on a global scale. Tesla requires 10x more subsidies per vehicle, doesn't own their battery supply chain, took longer to be profitable, made significant amounts of money from reservations they are yet to fulfill, etc...
For all the talk of gigantic governmental pushes, the US still supports Tesla far more than China supports BYD simply by offering 5-7x more in subsidies per vehicle.
I think, on the global scale, that BYD has done better and is doing better, as far as scale - they make almost as many cars as Tesla but also make far more than cars, such as buses, trucks, industrial equipment, various electronics - markets that Tesla has been unsuccessful in. The fact that they do so on lower revenue is a sign to me that they can simply produce more efficiently, ie, better at scaling.
Simply not true.
> For all the talk of gigantic governmental pushes, the US still supports Tesla far more than China supports BYD
That is just false. China has throwing gigantic support behind the whole push to EV. Not to mention that BYD profited massively from the protection of the government from IP theft. China literally threw lots of money at the whole supply-chain that BYD is building on.
And China had a large number of inventive programs for EVs as well, but Tesla profited from those 2.
> doesn't own their battery supply chain
BYD makes batteries but they certainty don't own their whole supply-chain. Tesla has started to make batteries and they are going deep into the supply-chain making their own materials and so on.
> made significant amounts of money from reservations they are yet to fulfill
Its not as much as you seem to think and it wouldn't change the overall picture.
> I think, on the global scale, that BYD has done better and is doing better, as far as scale
So how much does BYD sell in Europe and the US, its far less then Telsa does. BYD cars are mostly sold in China. They do sell buses and such outside of China. But in terms of Cars they massively profiting from targeting their local market first.
> such as buses, trucks, industrial equipment, various electronics - markets that Tesla has been unsuccessful in. The fact that they do so on lower revenue is a sign to me that they can simply produce more efficiently, ie, better at scaling.
Tesla makes revenue and more profit ...
The fact remains:
> here have been dozens of new car companies in China operating a far greater scale than Tesla
This is false, and I corrected it.
I hope EV startups succeed! I am just pointing out how hard it is to do it from scratch and that anyone who even gets close should be recognized.
(This is a play on Tesla never defining "delivered").
Didn't he put like, a whole car, into orbit around the Sun?
They needed a known weight to test the rocket and orbital flight mechanics. Instead of putting any random thing, he put his car and the world went gaga over the stunt. It brought Tesla and SpaceX tremendous amount of press.
As a founder, he made full use of an opportunity.
But seriously, that stunt has nothing to do with production Teslas. Tesla is still a very new player we are now seeing more and more growing pains, especially on the customer side, which is too bad but honestly should have been expected.
We are the first adopters to discover what kind of shelf life a Tesla car has, what it works like after 5, 10 and 15 years. Personally, I'm not optimistic about it. It seems to break down quite easily for a lot of people - add a decade of wear and tear on top of that, and it's not a great picture.
The base electronic, motors and batteries seem to be pretty reliable for most people. They had very few major issues with those things compared to most companies much smaller EV efforts.
Teslas are ever more in demand, with wait times extending to a year. They are the highest selling EVs in the world by a large margin and they make the highest margin on EVs they sell, while others are losing money and stopping production (latest of which is Ford Mache E).
He knows what he's doing.
He took direct control of a company when it was going straight to shit and now its by far the largest EV company on the planned and they are still growing like a startup.
The public perception that everything Musk does it to optimize short term stock price seems to me totally and completly wrong.
I think far more accurate assesment would be that he focus on long term planning off the core limitation his companies are facing. And that will be positive for long term.
And so far this has proven out very successful. I can give many exapmles.
And in that he pays sometimes for not doing as well on the sideshows. Aguable that is the only way you can even consider running multible comapanies like that.
This misconception was dispelled when I then bought a car new from the world's largest car manufacturer. It's difficult to overestimate how much they can screw it up.
Dealerships aren't just awful for the buying experience. They're also awful for the service experience. If anything, Tesla's model of providing at-home service for small or routine work is an exception from the norm that, in my experience, raises it above other premium brands.
So you're saying Electrek, a website which focuses almost exclusively on electric vehicle news, wrote an article about an electric vehicle company?
No way.
Could you expand ?
Even changing tires requires at least some training, including proper threading of the lug nuts and especially proper torquing. Too much or too little torque will both lead to problems, and just braaapp-ing them on with the air wrench is definitely not cool (and no, the "torque bars" between the drive lug and socket do not work properly either, I've had to redo more nuts some yahoo put on with those than I can count).
So, ya, this is really not cool.
To people like you and I with that kind of experience and sensibility already trained in, a few sentences and we're more than good to go, because we'll intuit the rest from our pre-existing knowledge.
And, even to a person with general feel for tools and materials but new to automotive, even eplaining torquing takes more than a few sentences. You can't just say "pull the towque wrench until it clicks" - you need to explain that you cannot push it faster, and you cannot keep clicking it mutiple times, as both of those will result in overtorquing. Ensuring that both stud and lug nut threads are clean & properly lubricated, or the spec'd torque won't actually create the required thread tension to hold... it's not just 3 sentences, it's more like a 15min lecture.
For everyone else, it is like explaining it to a monkey — they might hear it, but will get some of the explicit instructions wrong and make bad or random judgements about everything else. Even if some of the major things are gotten right, there's a 100 other things that can go wrong - they don't mount the socket quite right on the nut, push too hard and slip with the wrench, scratching the adjacent body panel, and sure, they redo it and ultimately get the torque right, but now there's a scratch on the customer's car... or something is off and they don't have the shop sense to know it, then some accident happens... I've had even good mechanics who properly torque things spin the nuts on then forget to torque one wheel (maybe distracted by a call, didn't get back to it).
We've all been around the cringefest of people with zero (or negative) mechanical or tool sense in a shop — constantly hoping that they'll leave soon or learn fast. At least the people who want to learn probably will with good experience and guidance. But I sure as heck wouldn't want some poor salesguy who doesn't even want to be there working next to me or working on my car.
I do get the personnel shortage, and Tesla definitely needs to address their constantly reported nearly Google-horrible service. I also think it would be OK if they asked for volunteers from other staff who has experience. but somehow, it looks more like it's just another mad scramble. Some will get it right and learn something, but it'll mostly be more fckups, done faster.
Edit fmt
When I was young, learning to work on cars was just a normal part of adolescence.
Edit: My personal interpretation is this: It is very difficult for a man to sit on the sidelines and watch another man do things. And yet that is what every journalist has to go through. While others are doing things and changing things, he is merely sitting there and commenting. While the other is the artist, he is the mere critic. While the other seems to have power of a nature, all the critic seems to have is power over people’s opinions. Now, if such a person focused on the greater whole, he would still be able to find purpose in what he is doing. After all, we need good journalism. But if he is focused on his own ego, the act of comparing himself to the person he is writing about will make him bitter and resentful. He will feel as though he is standing in the shadows of this other person. As if, if he could only make this other person smaller, he himself would become bigger. That the very act of comparing himself to another person and trying to derive his sense of self-worth from such a comparison is itself what makes him feel small doesn’t even occur to him.
Also why does a Tesla even need service other than a quick safety check. It’s not like the brake pads should be worn fast with regen and there’s no oil to change.
People can go from mega hype-person to mega detractor quite fast.
Those sentiments trail any actual improvements for a long time.
The cars from their newer factories have generally better quality.
And even so, when looking at QC report Telsa might not be great, but its not really an order magnitude off to anybody else either.
So to suggest they should stop growing to fix QC is just delusional and literally nobody, not even you as CEO would do so.
What electric cars do not have are timing belts, sparkplugs, fuel pumps --otherwise ICE propulsion are pretty reliable.
Why does any massively complicated machine need service? Because things break.
Because the initial build quality of the cars is still so poor they come broken, or quickly break.
I humbly submit that electronic parts might actually be less reliable than mechanical parts.
"36% of Model 3 buyers in Q1 2022 didn't have any service visits during the first 30 days of ownership while 54% had one and 10% had two visits."
Only a minority of Model 3 buyers get a car that isn't broken in the first month.