I suspect Elsevier's upper management layer is dominated by the PPE set of the Oxbridge upper class.
[1] http://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2019/01/10/lea...
2,292 karma · joined February 21, 2007
expertise is in renewable energy, electricity markets, construction materials and, back in the day, heterogeneous catalysis ;-)
contact by gmail with same user name.
I suspect Elsevier's upper management layer is dominated by the PPE set of the Oxbridge upper class.
[1] http://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2019/01/10/lea...
When viewed like this a mental model of a nucleus with electrons 'orbiting' around it is entirely valid and literally drops the student in the early 20th century.
One of the problems with experts is that they try building a straight line from zero to expert that never needs a backtrack step.
Personally I like the opportunity for students to learn about the experimental evidence that _forces them_ to need a better theory than the one they've come in with. Cognitive dissonance is one of the most powerful forces students have for learning - a good teacher should be engineering these moments as part of their lesson design.
https://www.archery360.com/2017/05/26/celeb-world-class-arch...
part of writing the tutorial is exercises - i like a stripped down flash card system. i try and do random-10 as regularly as possible. at the beginning, there's lots of jargon with scripted answers (ie, what is a blah?) but after a while you can move those to the back and you're left with some multi-step questions - over time (because i'm not trying to memorise the answer pattern) i find that i internalise a kind of narrative that uses the concepts/jargon to grope my way to the answer ie, hmmm looks like an aqueous equilibria question, probably need the equilibrium expression (jot that down) and HCl is a strong acid, so i can ignore those two terms and oh look... there's the answer if I just do this and that. Over time, it's the 'groping for an answer' that sticks as a habit of thought and seems to be quite robust. having said all that, i'm craphouse at maths but i'm hoping to get into one day.
It's like comparing new drugs to the best off-patent generic, not a placebo sugar pill.
I scroll down on my mbp laptop and the @#$@#$ pictures move to the right...
Aside from the credentialing problem, you will get an amazing return on investment - just view it as buying hours of your own time _not_ wasted on @$@#$# youtube videos.
If you're an over-achiever, you might negotiate a lower price on the understanding that the curriculum he develops (with your feedback/experience) for you stays with him and he markets it on the forums he has credibility in.
They/we aren't, for the most part, privileged - they land in London with 50 quid, buy an A-Z at the airport and doss with friends under the kitchen table till they land a job doing whatever. Save and party until summer and then a long af van trip around Europe seeing the sights. Rinse and repeat if you've got the stomach for it. Variations exist.
The leaving your country part is the important part. Even if it's English speaking you'd be surprised at the resilience you need to just get s* done arriving somewhere at midnight with no idea where you're going to sleep.
Being punished for 'gaps' in your CV is a cultural thing. There are no gaps in your life, just... life.