The Secret Syndicate Behind Nancy Drew
daily.jstor.org
daily.jstor.org
Related; there was some really great writing for television back then; Circus Boy and The Rifleman are two examples.
As of last year, a Nancy Drew series whose pilot had been rejected by CBS was in development at NBC.
> Iirc, there was a tv series for each in the '70s.
Also (and they flopped) the 1990s (in Canada, I believe.)
And Nancy Drew had an ABC TV movie intended to launch a series in 2002, but no series emerged.
And there was a 2007 Nancy Drew movie.
So, it's not exactly a property that's been ignored, even if there hasn't been much success with it since the 1970s.
https://www.theguardian.com/books/booksblog/2010/sep/23/thre...
"The Three Investigators were created by Robert Arthur, who wrote the first few books and then oversaw and edited the rest of the series. It was he who had the brainwave of having Alfred Hitchcock as the patron of the team. Hitch introduced each case, and often called them in to set them off on their latest adventure. It was this intrusion of real life into a fictional world that cemented my relationship with the Three Investigators. Could these stories possibly be true ... ?"
And...
"The real magic, though, was in the boys' headquarters, hidden among the piles of junk in Uncle Titus's scrapyard. Built from an abandoned trailer, the secret base was accessed via a series of ingenious secret passages, with the codenames Green Gate One, Tunnel Two, and Red Gate Rover – the latter so named because it was hidden behind a painting of a dog."
The Three Investigators were truly immersive and fun to read. You'd hardly get a peep from me once I got stuck into one. I think I was reading almost one a day and would burn all my holiday pocket money on them. I didn't read them in any particular order and just grabbed them whenever I found a new copy I hadn't read before.
I reckon there must be a box of these somewhere in my dad's attic, it'd be fun recover them to see how they stand up.
https://www.theguardian.com/books/booksblog/2010/sep/23/thre...
I'm 48, so I read the Hardy Boys books mostly in the mid to late 70s. That whole era seemed to be stuck in time; lots of pop culture sort of pushed as "current" was clearly from at least 10 to 20 years before, but even as a kid it was pretty clear there was a disconnect. The Hardys never watched TV, for example. They used terms like "jalopy" and "sedan". Etc.
I assume the mismatch was partly because of the rapid societal changes that took root starting in the 60s, plus a sort of refusal to acknowledge those by the generation just ahead of the boomers that were really still in fundamental control through the 80s.
And Chet was rarely fat, but often 'portly', 'heavy-set', 'chunky' or 'stout'. :)
In retrospect (I read 75-80 Hardy Boys books as a kid, many of them over and over), it is amazing how formula-based the story trajectories were and how one-dimensional all the characters were. I bet with some practice, an author could churn out a book in the time it took me to read one.
This seemsa part of current vernacular to me, and I have lived in several different regions of the US.
Many of the bad guys in Tom Swift and the Hardy Boys were described as “swarthy”. My girlfriend’s father, who was a truly lovely man, would go on to use that word to describe me back in the 1980s. She and her mother were horrified but I thought it was hilarious.
Edit: I’m shocked to find out from the Wiki article that it seems as though he really did write them!
Such people could vary their formula—they're not doing this as work-for-hire with strict requirements under a producer, this is just the stuff they publish as a hobby. And you'd expect a "normal" person in such a situation to get bored and want to vary their formula, especially as they gain more followers. Most creators do, but these ones don't. They just keep on makin' what they're makin', to a strict standard that lets them continue to pump out a lot of it, rather than making each successive work more of a production than before. It's what they like doing.
I'm not a psychiatrist, so I can't say for sure what's going on with such people (though I've heard the phrase "systematizing personality" before and it sounds applicable here.) But I can say for sure that such people certainly do exist.
According to Wikipedia, in total they sold in the ballpark of a billion copies.
Then again, I guess it could be argued she basically wrote the same book more than 700 times.