3,444 karma · joined November 20, 2012
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/19/business/draftkings-ai.ht...
Pull quote:
> Ms. Kalani said that company leaders made a “collective decision” not to use predictive technology for problem gambling. “We evaluated that it wasn’t evidence-based,” she said.
# YOLO mode
You just admitted it's controllable.
For technically competent users, sure. but for everyone else the UI should just follow the principal of least surprise.
And in my mind, one email alert or pop-up to all current users letting them know the service is going away (in case they had not been told which is as I've said before often the case in large orgs) is very far from the definition of spam.
That's quite an extraordinary claim there which I doubt would hold up to an even cursory level of scrutiny. But if you yell it loud enough, maybe people will be afraid to challenge your assertion.
+ every layperson is an expert in 1 or more areas.
Is it easier to find unused GPUs than unused CPUs?
Fair enough, but to be truly safe you really need the whole pipeline connected. model -> validation -> emitted code.
Sounds about right for the people and orgs involved.
Preach. I feel like I'm taking crazy pills every time someone claims TLA+ as the sine qua non of provably correct systems. They should sub probably for provably.
This is only true if your local model is already resident in RAM / VRAM.
You hit the proverbial nail on the head there!
https://www.litcharts.com/lit/guns-germs-and-steel/themes/ge...
But it's not if you can jump to the front of the GPU allocation line like Musk has done.
On being sane in insane places: A tale from inside the marketing department of a frontier AI Lab.