You can also find more stuff that he's done at his website, http://brand.io/
380 karma · joined December 18, 2009
email: joelfriedly+hn@gmail.com
GitHub: https://github.com/jfriedly
KCT: http://www.kellycreativetech.com/
Nebula: http://www.nebula.com/
Last updated: 2013-10-06
You can also find more stuff that he's done at his website, http://brand.io/
[1] http://nlp.stanford.edu/~socherr/EMNLP2013_RNTN.pdf
Edit: formatting
joelfriedly@gmail.com
Thanks!
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6155530
Their submission currently has 34 upvotes.
I won't try to defend all of their posts; most of them are things that I don't even find interesting. But it seems that someone basically used banning as a method of cutting down on uninteresting material.
That may even be a good way of maintaining the signal-to-noise ratio on HN: if we ban the users that post many uninteresting links then the community won't have to see them. But it wasn't a tactic that I was aware of before today.
First alpha release of Python 3.4 is out (python.org)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6155423
It probably linked to [1], but all we can tell is that it was something at python.org. The post was by plessthanpt05, an HN user for about two years with 838 karma. All of his/her posts from the past year or so are dead (about 60 of them). They don't appear to be a bot.
Python 3.4.0a1 isn't something that would interest everyone on HN, but it certainly doesn't seem like the kind of thing that should have been killed.
[1] http://python.org/download/releases/3.4.0/
Edit: more details on plessthanpt05
[1] http://www.statisticbrain.com/online-dating-statistics/
[2] https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/...
lunabluehotel.com seems to have gone offline yesterday, I suspect as a result of a traffic spike following their blog post. From their twitter stream:
> Seems that our website, http://www.lunabluehotel.com is currently down. We have a call in to find out why & solve the... http://fb.me/15notFYoE
(Note the link at the end of the tweet is also broken.) They also posted on the 23rd that views of their wordpress-hosted blog post were spiking:
> We just noticed that views of our Expedia blog post have gone through the roof for the 24 hours or so, all coming... http://fb.me/zyw2aX7R
Pharmatrak eventually won on appeal though, arguing that they had no intention of collecting personal information, which exonerated them because only intentional eavesdropping is a crime.
The company in the OP's article could make no such arguments though. I suspect that their main difference is that they make no assurances of confidentiality to the websites using their software the way Pharmatrak did. Which 1) is just really creepy, and 2) sets them up for trouble with users in California, because California's wiretapping statutes say that it's a crime unless both parties agree to it. [3]
[1] http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/packets001737.shtml
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_bug
[3] I'm not sure if this applies to police, but it definitely does to private parties: http://www.citmedialaw.org/legal-guide/california-recording-...
Edit: Added third reference.
The point of this article is that a sample only accurately reflects the whole in some ways. Variability in particular scales with the square root of the sample size. And since misconceptions about variability have been at the heart of many controversies (male vs. female intelligence, school size, cancer risk, etc.), De Moivre's equation is important; even dangerous in the sense that ignorance of it has led to billions of dollars wasted.
Chen, a journalist at Gawker, actually did it: http://gawker.com/
Not even bothering to submit this as a story to HN because I'm pretty sure Gawker links get auto-killed (with good reason, the Gawker article is crap).
Summary of Stanford's online course offerings(not affiliated with Stanford)
should be:
Summary of Stanford's online course offerings (not affiliated with Stanford)
Now that I took Stanford's Machine Learning class though, I think I might just duplicate what this guy did for our bot.
Our architecture explicitly omits a clock, saving energy and time among other benefits.
Also, they quoted instruction execution time as being as low as 1400 picoseconds, so 700MHz equivalence is probably the best case, not the average case.
Edit: They also say in the architecture paper that their goal is one billion operations per second, or 1GHz.
[1] http://www.greenarraychips.com/home/documents/greg/PB002-100...
[1] http://googleresearch.blogspot.com/2006/08/all-our-n-gram-ar... [2] http://www.ldc.upenn.edu/Catalog/CatalogEntry.jsp?catalogId=...
Edit: Source: http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090507/1152134782.shtml
Where was this quote even in the article?
@Alex Khomenko told me in another place, that there may be
a secondary authentication on password changes from the
forgotten password link, in the US PayPal. If true and
currently in place this would mean that the US is not
vulnerable, although they may still have the email bug
He said he doesn't use PayPal himself and that he only requested a change password link when he was trying to contact them about "effective spam". Perhaps he supplied them with one of his email addresses and it happened to have a counterpart at a different subdomain (like example@email.com vs example@email.com.au)?EDIT: Formatting.
EDIT This link works: http://webyes.com.br/wp-content/uploads/ebooks/book_producin...
Target user: People like me that don't check Facebook everyday, but would still like to receive an email when their friend finally makes it Facebook-official that him and the girl he's been talking to for weeks are dating.