Obviously AI will change the legal industry. But a lawyer will still have an advantage because they know what questions to ask and can provide the AI with the relevant context.
275 karma · joined August 9, 2012
Obviously AI will change the legal industry. But a lawyer will still have an advantage because they know what questions to ask and can provide the AI with the relevant context.
Side note, why isn't this on the front page? The points to recency ratio seems high enough.
You can grab a TestFlight link at https://cutword.com
Plus if you're building apps for clients handing off the whole hosting side of things sounds amazing.
The other 10% goes into our personal checking accounts to spend on whatever we want.
Had a sleep study done years ago that showed mild sleep apnea, but at the time wasn't severe enough to warrant a CPAP.
Looks like Gyroflow has a plugin for DaVinci Resolve[1]. If the stabilization has been improved and could be done right in Resolve I will definitely us this.
[1] https://docs.gyroflow.xyz/app/getting-started/installation/d...
But I don't see how an LLM training on your works deprives you of something you had before.
Most of us would agree that duplicating and selling someone's book is immoral. Similarly I think we'd all agree that reading multiple books to learn about a topic and then writing your own is perfectly fine.
So where does an LLM trained on millions of books fall? Personally, I don't find it immoral but I know others will disagree. I'd be curious to hear arguments for the immorality of LLMs trained on copyrighted works.
This article says that Google Fi customers were SIM swapped due to a T-Mobile breach. Even though "[t]here was no access to Google's systems or any systems overseen by Google."