1,547 karma · joined February 6, 2013
actually I only had to put in 10 9s to get 180...
What level of privacy is left to be breached!?!
Very helpful analogy - hadn't thought of it like that. Now I'll know whether the seemingly intractable problems in my code are only temporarily intractable due to my incompetence, or actually intractable for grander reasons :)
Growing productivity could also just lead to decreasing employment if the same roles are being accomplished by fewer people who do them more efficiently. Having a bit of work on the side essentially amounts to people who are employed doing more, rather than unemployed people having an Etsy or ebay shop which is their main employment. And many of these people probably don't count as "unemployed," as there are advantages to being set up as a full time seller (at least on ebay and amazon) for tax purposes.
Many multinational corporations also seem to find it in their interests to criminalize journalism - more evidence that we are in a "post-state" world, or simply the just desserts of capitalism?
That's because you haven't actually had to start using T-Mobile's horrendous service. When I tried to do this (admittedly a couple years ago) they told me with a straight face, after I had gone through all the effort of changing "You can't use data on your smartphone because you didn't get it from us." Why would I have changed over if I couldn't use data!?!? (It would have been edge or something ridiculous as well, as only people on certain contracts could use 3g!)
Forbes does not make any representations or warranties as to SafeSource, and your use of SafeSource is on an "as is" basis, at your own risk.
I suppose it is just to cover them legally, but they could be a bit more reassuring to whistleblowers and informants who might not understand the technology very well or the credentials of those who have vouched for it like Schneier and others.
Can bitcoin's unregulatable nature really provide an example for how establishment financial systems should be better regulated? Bitcoin can be an alternative, it seems, but not a "city on a hill" to fiat currencies, and their financial systems.
Isn't their significant evidence that more diverse gene pools, even unexpected combinations of genes are usually more adapted in several ways, because of heterosis [0]. It seems foolish that this one new factor would make eugenics any more successful than its last phase of popular. Not to mention it the deeply-held 'moral repugnance'[1] aspect.
[0] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heterosis
[1] http://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/2624677/Roth_Repu...
http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2013/07/the-vitami...
but maybe there is more to it when it comes to SAD...
Some people have mentioned that in the huge price spike in April, there were not actually that many people buying, and then there is this article on Bitcoin spreads that calls into question whether Mt. Gox is the best measure: http://www.forbes.com/sites/beltway/2013/09/03/how-bitcoin-s...
Driverless cars are only 90% there for complete autonomy, and the last 10% could take another 50 years.
It's a shame it took so long, but hopefully this will stem the tide of young people who have been pushed towards using their language in transliterated form rather than the original script (I am thinking of Arabic dardasha writing specifically, but I imagine there are other examples)
Are there still any scraps? I thought you ate it all!?
The point of my comment (in my own thinking) was not cynicism, nor even a disbelief of the impact his inventions would have on poverty, but an interest in the mechanics of the relationship between his inventiveness and his commitment to fight inequality and poverty. Perhaps he was incredibly far-sighted and visionary in being able to see how his inventions would have a significant impact on poverty in the long run, and it would be fascinating to see the intermediate steps he saw that would lead to that. Or maybe he thought his inventions would impact poverty in a trickle down way. Or maybe he simply had a sense of faith that if he invented as best he could, it would one day have an impact that even he couldn't imagine.
I would love to understand how best to join up inventive ideas with a commitment to end poverty and injustice. And I imagine Stanford Ovshinsky is a great model in that, but I felt like that one little statement from the original article left me hanging a little bit, and wanting more. I had hoped that the HN community could fill in with a few more ideas, or even details from Ovshinsky's life that would be further enlightening.
My apologies if I came across as disrespectful to a man who is clearly a hero and an inspiration - that was never my intention.
This is an interesting statement, given that it doesn't sound like any of his inventions seem to be particularly focused on ending poverty in any direct way.
So who are the new new Industrious Apprentices? Growth Hackers? ;)