600 karma · joined September 26, 2013
I'm trying to view it in a good way.
original test (with hidden td elements)
js blocks: 800ms
react: 1250ms
After removing hidden element
jsblocks: 350-400ms
react: 200-350ms
So yes, jsblocks can render a lot more input elements that you shouldn't be using faster than react. The react team explains why the inputs are fairly heavy when rendering a large amount, https://github.com/facebook/react/issues/3771 They didn't stop there though and they responded to my claims and came back with a new test. This time they just ramped up the number of data points by double and added an extra td element to make it an unreasonable absurd amount of elements.
revised test (original test of 5000 elements to 18000 elements)
jsblocks: 600ms (they posted 700ms, so ill give them that)
react: 700ms (they posted 950ms)
After removing half of the data to about 9000 elements react already started to tie jsblocks
jsblocks: 450ms
react: 450ms
Going down to about 5000 elements
jsblocks: 250ms
react: 200ms
Whether or not there is any merit to this library, you can't just go claiming that you have the fastest library so audaciously like this blog post and their marketing. It's terrible for the community. There are an absurd amount of javascript libraries and getting devs to push a few key frameworks forward is already difficult enough. And if you are going to add another library to the list, at least be able to back up your claims.
I will admit that jsblocks seems to be better at rendering extremely large amounts of tabular data, but that is never an issue for me and you should be using lots of different techniques to mitigate that anyway. But once you get to realistic scenarios react is still faster and comes with tons of other advantages.
I didn't test the angular one because I don't know enough to spot odd code, but without even looking into the code the fact that angular was the only one that didn't have a minified library seems fishy. It's at 900+kb compared to the jsblocks/react at 125ish kb. To me it seems like since status qua is react is faster and angular is slower, they just constructed these tests to make it 3. angular, 2. react, 1. jsblocks (the fastest library ever!!).
So there's my rant. Please stop promoting your library like you are, it's just distasteful.
edit: https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0BxTyg4RuMOHUfjlvTkN3... Here's a link of the original test without the hidden elements, the response test that required a ton of elements, and the email they sent still talking about their amazing speed!
I am assuming having rich people in your city is a good thing, but I genuinely think it is overall.
https://techmeabroad.com/ http://www.jobsintech.io/
If you have the skills and resume, I'm sure you won't have trouble finding a job.
Also https://remoteok.io/ is a great resource for remote jobs. Most employers don't care as long as you can get shit done and work with a team. If you are a professional full stack developer your confidence in your ability to produce will come through.
You will probably have to work more to get to where you want compared to some American counterparts, but the path is there and the tools are out there. Best of luck.
A great firewall of America?
Bribery as fairly standard practice in business.
Pushing away other countries from your economy.
We shouldn't glorify youth or age, just quality.
I will say that the design is much smaller and minimal so maybe all the fancy addon removal will help cost. But then you have to pay for boards and stuff anyway.
French politicians putting aside differences to fight.
Anti-nazi Germans fighting German nazis.
Women staying to fight to protect their trapped husbands.
And it's all in a castle, which is just the icing on this ridiculous cake.
Clearly some of them were on very different paths than me. I taught myself and charging anything over $30/hour would have been deceitful. I couldn't imagine delivering that much value when I was starting.
Not trying to just back them for no reason, but I'm happy with what they are giving the community.
Imagine if we just planned for a lot of other technologies before they came out that we didn't think would have. We could have avoided some serious problems. It is obviously a balance of fostering innovation vs safety regulations, but some safety considerations are a must in my opinion.