The CHIP Is a $9 Computer That Can Almost Do It All
techcrunch.com
techcrunch.com
YMWV! (Your mileage WILL vary)
I think mobile GPU drivers in general are pretty much a wasteland, but at least VideoCore is a documented wasteland.
OpenGLES drivers are much, much better than they used to be (but still very bad).
edit: I might be asking a lot, since, there is even a wikipedia page on how to find and read the docs for ARM, so I guess, it will be, as usual a giant mess of docs spread everywhere.
Some things like the ethernet controller are still under NDA but that is because it is from a third party (Synopsis).
[1] https://linux-sunxi.org/A10 [2] https://github.com/ssvb/xf86-video-fbturbo
Also keep in mind the company doesn't need to make profits selling the CHIP itself. Their business plan seems to be to sell it at cost while making money on the plethora of accessories: the LiPO battery is $10, the VGA Adapter is $10, the HDMI adapter is $15, etc. Also they might try to make a $0.50 or $1.00 profit here and there on shipping costs (the FAQ even has an entry "international shipping is too expensive").
Enjoy your $9 computer. 15 years ago a machine with these specs would have cost 1 month of an engineer's salary... I love technological progress!
[1] http://www.ebay.com/itm/7-A13-Single-Core-8GB-Google-Android...
I was about to dispute that statement, because I remember that used Dell Latitude C600 laptops (with 512 RAM and 20 GB HDD) were going for about $700 on eBay around 2002. But, that same laptop cost over $4000 just two years prior. So, indeed, that could have been a month's wages for an engineer. Still, it's amazing that something can go from "prohibitively expensive" to "impulse buy" in the span of 3 years.
- 4GB of solid-state storage. This alone was $4000 for 4GB in 2000: http://www.jcmit.com/flash2014.htm
- Wireless adapter. They were very rare and expensive back in 2000 but I can't find exact price information
I highly doubt they will be able to produce the CHIP for $9/unit.
I will say that the design is much smaller and minimal so maybe all the fancy addon removal will help cost. But then you have to pay for boards and stuff anyway.
Even assuming 20K volumes:
Current market price for 4GB of flash is about $2.50[1]; 512MB of RAM is about $2[1]. Processor -- even if something like A33 -- would be about $4. You have another $2 of regulator, connectors, etc. The PCB is about $1.75 in volume and assembly would be $1. That's $13.25.
Even if somehow they manage to make this thing really really cheap and get below that price, let's assume $7 or 50% of magical discount on top of current volume pricing, that's not much margin. Even if you sell 100K of these a year (which is very high) you've made only 200K in profit!
EDIT: I forgot about BLE+WiFI -- add $4!
Some are saying PCB pricing is high: I'm basing that on 2.3"x3.3" 6 layer board with 8 mils holes, and 4 mil clearance and ENIG finish.
[1] I'm basing this on recent 50K purchases but here is a more public source: http://www.dramexchange.com/
Source : A rough quote from http://www.sz-jlc.com/ came out to $0.15 for less than 10k boards
Looking at the picture of their board the package is most likely 0.65 or -- possibly 0.4 -- pitch which means much laser drilled holes.
I think your PCB and assembly costs are a bit high, as well.
I agree that their margins can't be good.
PCB might sound high, but it isn't standard 8/8/10 spec PCB. It will have smaller holes and tighter tolerances.
Remember that they're not going to be shipping for a year. I'm guessing prices will come down over that time.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Mini-USB-Bluetooth-Wireless-Adapter-...
Also, on the flip side of cost comparison, low-quality Allwinner-based tablets are easily available at under $30 on AliExpress.
I was pleasantly surprised by the materialization of the RasPi despite their troubles getting production started.
That said, I think this is a pipe dream. Its SO easy to hack together a prototype and then look at the volume discounted total of the BOM and think you've got a product. The most common mistake is to give yourself a "generous" 20% profit over the estimated cost of materials when really it should be more like 300% just to be viable.
I suspect they'll discover soon enough that $20-$30 is a minimum realistic retail sale price for this item.
Also, it's look like allwinner's version of broadcom's rpi, so they mught get the various chips dirty cheap.
How an industry giant and a tiny startup came to partner on a sub-$10 computing device owes to Next Thing’s history developing products and business connections with Shenzhen-based accelerator HAXLR8R, says Dave Rauchwerk, one of Next Thing’s three founders. “Once they understood what we were trying to do, they supported us fully.”
Connecting with the right company wasn’t the only break the Oakland-based team had going for them. At the same time they were meeting with Allwinner and explaining their aspirations for a dirt-cheap computer, Allwinner was looking to redesign their successful A13 processor in a new, smaller form factor as a cheaper system-on-chip. It is this new chip, called the R8, that Next Thing received early access to and used in its board design.
Reading Bunnie's blog about the ecosystem in China though I doubt AllWinner cares. They are certainly in the "Why ask permission? Is weird! Hey look how cheap this is?" camp.
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1598272670/chip-the-wor...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peek_%28mobile_Internet_device%...
Another option is the Motorola Photon Q.
Sadly, that was already old when it was released as new in 2012. Given 3 years of wear and tear, I was sad when I finally had to trade mine in for a keyboard-less glass brick.
I've looked at some BT keyboards with my glass brick, but the keyboards themselves were terrible.
TechCrunch, why on earth do you think I know what "a Haxlr8r company" is?
(One Moment later) Yep, just as I thought: a HArdware aCCeLRATOR, like YC but for hardware.
Single Cortex-A8 (don't disclose cache sizes) DDR2/3 up to 530MHz 16-bit bus 512MB Max capacity Support NAND/SPI Nor/SD Card 1080p30 decode, 720p30 encode H.264
They don't disclose the clock but can't imagine it is high.
[1] http://www.allwinnertech.com/en/clq/R_series/2015/0514/6066....
I'll definitely be keeping an eye on how the PocketCHIP turns out.
If it had Ethernet or USB, it might be useful for experimenting with distributed systems.
Just in case someone feels like fixing the headline.