Maybe was the easiest way to add people you knew in real life, esp if you didn't make your real name searchable. (Remember at the time people were more paranoid about staying anonymous on the Internet; this was before most social networks.)
3,096 karma · joined August 20, 2009
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/jaredsohn; my proof: https://keybase.io/jaredsohn/sigs/c4qehWaH0L35LPkCjENi802VbcU8vadCoG7uwYMLiTA ]
Maybe was the easiest way to add people you knew in real life, esp if you didn't make your real name searchable. (Remember at the time people were more paranoid about staying anonymous on the Internet; this was before most social networks.)
Imagine a world where all apps had numeric user ids and people memorized them.
Here's the ICQ song: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=va8dnGF3Xyw
Is helpful to always be skeptical of code and try to get an understanding of it.
Another way I think of it is I find it easier to revise than to write (both in English and code). So when I write something I just try to get my ideas out there and then skeptically reread it and recompose. LLMs let me just speed up that process.
BTW, this text on the site is false: "Geocities has one big advantage - it has been around a long time, and will probably continue, so it won't suddenly disappear and take your web-site with it"
Also used to use a bigfoot.com "Email forwarding for life" which I assume stopped working at some point.
I personally think of it as open in the sense that they provide an API to allow anyone to use it (if they pay) and take advantage of the training they did. Is in contrast to large companies like Google which have lots of data and historically just use AI for their own products.
Edit:
I define it as having some level of being open beyond 'nothing'. The name doesn't scale well over time based on business considerations and the business environment changing and was named poorly when 'open source' is a common usage of open within tech. They should have used AI products to help them in naming the company and be aware of such potential controversies.
From chatgpt today (which wasn't an option at the time but they maybe could have gotten similar information or just thought about it more):
What are the drawbacks to calling an AI company 'open'?
...
"1. Expectations of Open Source: Using the term "open" might lead people to expect that the company's AI technology or software is open source. If this is not the case, it could create confusion and disappointment among users and developers who anticipate access to source code and the ability to modify and distribute the software freely.
2. Transparency Concerns: If an AI company claims to be "open," there may be heightened expectations regarding the transparency of their algorithms, decision-making processes, and data usage. Failure to meet these expectations could lead to skepticism or distrust among users and the broader public."
...
https://www.theonion.com/for-a-few-months-i-had-it-all-18195...
I've had partial success in getting gpt4 to write rubocop cops (i.e. custom linting rules for ruby). I had to iterate a bit but eventually got something working and wouldn't have tried if I didn't have gpt helping me.
Related - if you search Google for a video and it finds a video on a Youtube /search page it will play it but it pauses when you tab away from it. If you want to listen to it in the background you need to move the tab to another window or open YouTube and probably watch an ad.
from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37197243
or more minimally have a tooltip that indicates the name of the person
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/xtab/amddgdnlkmoha...
If I have more open tabs than that, I likely won't be able to find them anyway.
https://developer.chrome.com/docs/webstore/money/
"The web has come a long way in the 11 years since we launched the Chrome Web Store. Back then, we wanted to provide a way for developers to monetize their Web Store items. But in the years since, the ecosystem has grown and developers now have many payment-handling options available to them."