568 karma · joined September 5, 2009
What stands out for me is the period when I was still just a kid, albeit the "neighborhood computer kid". I'd inevitably get a call every few weeks from someone who lived nearby or was a friend of my parents. I'd go over, almost always figure out the problem and then they would ask "How did you know to do that?". I'd explain what happened best I could, but I'd be thinking to myself, "How did I know to do that? Well, I didn't until now."
Also, it was pretty cool at 11 years old to discover that I could make money just by working on my own to help other people folks fix problems and didn't necessarily need a "real" job.
While there is obviously some overlap, I don't really see E-ink and LCD devices as competing for the same space and/or substitutes for one another.
[edit: Also wanted to add this. One of the coolest food experiences I've had was when visiting a friend in rural Sicily. Apparently the traditional method of making ricotta is largely illegal due to sanitary reasons (pasteurization, not simply doing it in the shed behind your house, etc). However one morning we got up around 4am and met some friends of his Dad. Spent a few hours learning how they made traditional ricotta and got to eat some fresh from the pot before they took the rest to sell to the locals. When it's boiling-hot and fresh from the pot, it's a totally different (and better) cheese than anything I've ever seen in the store.]
Barring a shareware style demo, I rarely make a leap of faith into a new software product. However, stellar reviews and/or at least a video example can make up for that. Maybe one exception would be updates to products I currently use.
[edited for clarity]
I've found that most technical PDF papers are non-trivial to convert to Kindle. It would be one thing if they were scaled down to a format that only required vertical scrolling, but as it stands unless the author/publisher makes an effort, most technical PDFs require horizontal and vertical scrolling. Certainly possible, but hardly convenient.
Point being, I did not sign their boilerplate non-compete. They were actually fine with that as long I signed a confidentiality agreement... and that's only fair.
FTA
>"They long ago shed that image, Hewlett says"
That's more or less my philosophy on pie charts. I find them helpful to use at the outset of a presentation to help provide some context for what's to follow (for example, the relative sales of Divisions A, B & C).
That said, I have no sympathy for anyone who uses side-by-side pie charts in order to make comparisons.
Based on the other posts, maybe you misread € for $?
[edit: Should add that although there are certainly disputes to how to fund said services, to the best of my knowledge it's largely agreed that some court system is required.]
Put differently, the expected value would be P(Keeps promise|Amount of promise)*(Amount of promise). However, both of the multiplicands in that are inversely proportional.
For example, I used the free R package "earth" to confirm that something like MARS(Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines) is a good approach to a particular analysis. For my client that initial test justified paying Salford Systems for their great, but expensive, CART/MARS software.
I included this technique in some work I did about a year ago, spoke a few times with the authors. Granted, this is geared towards operations that offer multiple services/varying levels of service as part of a "portfolio". Think telecom and finance. It addresses CLV, but includes a regular reassessment of value based on a customers pattern of behavior.
tldr; Instead of being service/no service it looks at a customer's propensity to change service (upgrade or downgrade), this includes downgrading to the point of termination.
Also, while I agree that most "infographics" are generally useless and belong on USA Today (where I will never have to see them), there are some uses. I find a captivating "infographic" can be a good introduction when presenting information, sort of as an overview. A clever and small "infographic" can get people interested and help provide some context for the hard data coming up. I have a similar rule with pie charts: I only use them at the very beginning of presenting a topic in order to provide some context and ease the audience in. Once I'm past the first few slides and I avoid them like the plague.