innovator116

Without IPR restrictions, most of manufacturing can be quickly scaled up in places outside China. Also remember, India is nuclear power and understand Mutually Assured Destruction working between India and China.

The author of this article is astrophysicist not biologist or virologist. It appears to be propaganda for Chinese CCP!

This will inevitably be compared to different approaches taken by RISC-V projects. IMHO, Only real world tests at scale can show, if it can live upto its universal processor claims.

Distributed, community cellular networks will be highly viable with open/public spectrum.

There was a Chinese knockoff of Lit Motors. Been following https://thrustcycle.com/index.html An Indian startup http://www.ligermobility.com/ is also developing self balancing EV for crowded Indian cities.

Impressive to replicate silicon semiconductor process. But wouldn't it be more feasible to develop as good enough process node, flexible, thin film semiconductor devices? Have been observing developments of plastic based transistors, inks, processes like nanoimprint lithography, Cleanroom in a STEM microscope and Chad Mirkin's Tera Print system. Can a small scale nanfab emerge using tech such as Nano-Ops http://nano-ops.net/nanoscale-printing/ ?

I imagine flexible, thin film, large panel based semiconductor SoC. It will not be just a mere microcontroller or IoT node, but a full fleged computing form factor. Think your wall as big plastic computer.

Why there cannot be small scale semiconductor fab model?

He had clarified in writing that he is not a Muslim.

What if they combine it with Holacracy?

Multi-stakeholding coops http://community-wealth.org/content/solidarity-business-mode... and open cooperativism http://p2pfoundation.net/Why_We_Need_a_New_Kind_of_Open_Coop... points to transition towards post-capitalism. As for lack of capital fairshares model is interesting http://www.fairshares-association.com/

Similar to Gitchain http://gitchain.org/ ?