This does not inspire confidence, and only displays their mediocrity and technical incompetence.
17 karma · joined February 6, 2024
This does not inspire confidence, and only displays their mediocrity and technical incompetence.
The fed also changed their own metric for inflation. It's a political play.
The very mention of "climate change" as being a factor for reducing offspring and second guessing kids is certainly not a right wing idea.
Secondly, anything from mainstream media outlets projects an alarmist tone. They operate on the basic impulse of fear.
While I'd rather not have the state involved in any sort of family planning, the topic is interesting to delve in.
Elastic money will perpetually confuse people, as it takes the discussion out of reality. This is not a simple "supply/demand" problem. It is artificial booms/busts that were instigated by the fed.
Home inventory is up 13% from last April with 1.6 million homes available. Builders are starting to go under water and are trying to flush inventory. 90 day delinquent credit card bills are at a 12-13 year high.
Reality is that the lies keep coming. The most simple and effective propaganda that exists is repetition. The affordability crisis is real, but inventory has not decreased and there is no "shortage"
This was released today - https://zillow.mediaroom.com/2024-07-16-Nearly-1-in-4-seller...
A buyer's market looms, brethren & sistren
I've seen a 2 minute long video showing the declining percentages mainstream media claimed on the vaccine over the course of 3 months. Perhaps this one particular article was dishonest however.
Although it is variant specific and from 5-11 age group
Real mitigations include removing the telematics modules in the vehicle, often known as the Data Communications Module (DCM). Also replacing the default radio with a 3rd party radio can dispense with the embedded secondary LTE modem, GPS, hotspot, WiFi, etc.
tl;dr, radio replacement and removing the telematics module (often above the radio)
They gaslit us on so many topics throughout the years. They have went back on their statements on Ivermectin
They have went back on their statements on efficacy of the jabs - starting from 99% effective down to 10% - indicating they never had any tangible data to support their claims
They said that the jabs were about stopping transmission, then gaslit saying they never said that despite hundreds of hours of recording saying otherwise
Fauci admitted the 6 ft distancing had no science / data behind it.
Should I bring forth the damage caused by thrusting stage 2 ventilators on people?
What about the damage from vaccines with myocarditis and GBS?
You can call me a conspiracy theorist all you want, but the official narratives are more riddled with inconsistencies than the "conspiracies" were
Now back to your original question of can we dispense with the data that is knowingly bad - yes.
Comorbidities were enough to do that, along with false attribution. Ofcourse these topics were heavily censored, creating even more discourse.
Google is taking a cut in organized crime and malware distribution. How this is "okay" is beyond me.
I am not calling for censorship in any way, and they certainly shouldn't redact/censor results. But, they are running a criminal operation with the displayed advertisements and lying about the location. The average users (especially elderly) are being harmed by Google advertisements.
This often leads to intrusions/breaches. The initial payload drops, the actor deploys a C2 framework (often Cobalt Strike), pivots laterally, then drops ransomware binaries for encryption. If I had to put a number on the amount of intrusions caused by Google PPC ads, it would be an upwards of 500.
This has been a growing problem since last November, and Google is effectively taking its cut from malware distributors and aiding/abetting organized crime.
In an instance for one of their engineering positions, they requested ~40 hours worth of work via a combination of system administration, development in C/Golang, and uploading to a git server where they could review the work.
At the time, I was a full-time student and declined given time constraints.
I would call myself an expert in scams / cons with online activity, however I myself was recently scammed during the holiday season. Physically rather than digitally though with one of those fake gold cons employing a variety of different tactics. They caught me off guard in a variety of ways by being parked off a rural Country highway early in the morning (6 am). I pulled over to see if they needed any help and the guy instantly approached my car where I was even more flustered. Point is, scams all seem ridiculous after the fact, but these people are not fools when it comes to social engineering, applying pressure, and taking advantage of the holes in the swiss cheese.
Many variables would've had me on high alert in my situation, but even being the "expert" I am, I fell victim. It's always easy to look back after the fact, or even after you have a few seconds to breathe. They play on immediacy / urgency often, and intentionally try to paralyze you in a sense.