I'm suggesting audits, not suing... if that is the implication.
674 karma · joined December 13, 2020
I'm suggesting audits, not suing... if that is the implication.
That is your opinion, but the optics of that should raise for you some flags. OAI could have waited (how long is a task left to the ethics committee) to see how the rumors panned out. Right now the optics look a lot like "we don´t care there is a 1/7 chance we one-up a human researcher by reacting to this rumor immediately, might makes right"
but then they proceed to NOT quote themselves themselves verbatim: "I deeply apologize for this extremely poor choice of words, it is the opposite of what I was trying to convey."
Sociopathic behaviour.
thanks, but no. There is a trivial reason this needs to stay in "The Jetsons" territory.
And you can check my comments, I'm no AI shill. If in 3 years we don't see positive change I'll go myself and put a wet finger in altmans ears.
not even finally buying my own home with my wife this year gave me the such a thrill, perhaps because it was very grueling and we still are waiting for some repairs to move in.
That is until people are faced with stuff like this :D. Then emotions take over.
why does reading this feel so good?
I was lacking material for my nightmares, thanks.
I can't avoid looking down on this attitude. But speaks more about people than it speaks about AI: those people want to win an argument, nothing more and nothing else
> There are already organizations taking advantage of this, actively producing "AI propaganda", meaning propaganda aimed at the LLMs themselves in order to influence their understanding of what is truthful and bend it towards powerful actors' agendas. They're not even hiding the fact that they're doing this.
namely grok.