LinkedIn CringeBot 3000
cringebot3000.com
cringebot3000.com
I find that just by not being cringe, obviously AI or obviously over the top sales-y makes the posts stand out and raise my (consulting) profile enough to land a meaningful number of clients, just as a second-order effect.
Lately I've been even more annoyed at the walls of its walled garden being raised higher, eg. no way to export my own posts, or having to log in to open linkedin shortened urls, which breaks my firefox site containers workflow.
With the Elonification of Twitter there has been a splittering of tech/biz audiences across different platforms, each with their own problems, and the split is different in different parts of the world.
It so happens that LI continues to be popular with the audience segment and geographic location I'm primarily working with.
Agree with all negative comments about the platform tho.
LinkedIn is pretty much the only social network out there where the average person has a shot at a little reach for their posts.
Even if it’s just past and present colleagues and various acquaintances, I actually have an audience of people who are sometimes interested in what I have to say. I can't say that for any other social network.
I think that's Kink.com :)
I also copy/paste non-cringe blog posts there occasionally. I think more people read them than on my actual blog.
The word you're looking for is self-respecting :)
On LI the majority of the stuff is so bad, I have zero self-awareness and just write whatever comes to mind (ie. an approach more like what you'd do in a comment like this one, than a "proper standalone post"). Many of my posts are just commentary on what's going on in the niche (eg. comments on a new AI model) which doesn't require a ton of extra research.
I also try to have a weekly/monthly cadence: at least one LI post a week, and one blog post on my own domain per month.
Like any sincere creative work, it takes effort. You may have to push yourself hard, yes. But like most things, it does get easier with practice.
I'd like to think that the era of AI slop will cause more people to become more sincere and thoughtful because it's a competitive advantage!
I guess it's the only place on the web now where people can post updates / follow people that isn't 1. so niche only 3 people are on it (federation), 2. twats and bots (X) or 3. narcissists (insta)
To escape the walled garden, I've ran a script to download all posts (JS to scroll down my feed, wait for the lazy loading, click on all "more..." links, wait for the lazy loading again, everything in a loop, then download the entire thing when there are no more posts). Then ran another script to convert those to blog posts, then posted them on my personal site.
Doable but annoying.
Do you realize that you are giving content for free to an already enshittified and closed platform?
Open a blog where everyone can read freely without to have an account in one of the worst platforms out there.
Or is it to be popular that you post there?
At least for me HN provides me with high quality posts, hence me coming back here for new sources of information. Not saying that all posts on HN are top quality but most of the time the situation is exactly the opposite to LinkedIn. So there's a lot of value to build up your own thing and put work on it.
Sure, I think it strange that these posters are posting directly into a site rather than writing locally and then copy/paste into the site so that the data on the site is no longer the only copy. But YOLO is real I guess
If you are the best consultant but you don't tell anyone about it, you'll not have many clients. In this case it's not about what you think is the best and most pure platform, but where your potential customers are hanging out.
I do, too.
My rule of thumb for anything longer than two paragraphs is publish on my personal blog first and then use LinkedIn's scheduling feature to post it in the future (LinkedIn gives you a 3 month window, but you can reschedule indefinitely)
Maybe I should give them money :)
I work in the European energy market sector and LinkedIn is one of the to go places to catch up with developments in the markets, the latest the analyses, and upcoming events. And some posts are actually good, you just need to filter out the rest. I wish there would be a better platform for this specific content (maybe I'm simply missing it) but for now, I find it there.
Coming from a computer science background and kinda accidentally ended up in energy markets, I was surprised that LinkedIn is the place for this content I(in contrast to the computer science field).
I, unsurprisingly, am making the same observations. Sometimes I do think about shipping a slim Chrome extension (~Ad Blocker) to classify and filter out useless content. Could make it a bit more bearable and useful.
It has a 'gentle mode' so you see what gets blocked.
I think it's thanks to it that I don't feel animosity towards LinkedIn anymore.
But if you actively prune / curate WHO you add to your LinkedIn, you end up with a feed that is genuinely useful.
What you do need to know is WHY you want to use LinkedIn. It could be to find your next job, finding potential customers, or just keeping up to date with <INDUSTRY>.
Part of the problem is the tech industry. There's plenty of people trying to get rich quick in tech and LinkedIn is essentially made for them. I don't see it as much in other fields where most people don't imagine themselves building unicorn AI startups with VC money and becoming obscenely rich.
It is a way to keep up with opinions about industry news, but at least for tech, I think this is all downstream of what's happening on "short-form" social media. It breaks on Twitter and then you get LLM-powered thought leadership on LinkedIn for the next two weeks.
LinkedIn is unusable, and wasn't even helpful at all in finding a new job.
Technical content appeared on LinkedIn.
Not just one or two posts. Tens of posts. Every day. Technical content from the thought leaders in the industry.
Yes, there was still corporate slop.
Yes, LinkedIn still mostly serves for self-aggrandisement.
But there were nuggets of gold, for those prepared to sift for them.
Seriously: LinkedIn is still mostly garbage. The quality of discussion is not great. But it has improved a bit, and given the fractured nature of social media at the moment it's somewhat viable to use it for technical content. It very much depends on the specific area. If you want to talk about the new hotness (e.g. using LLMs to write software) there is a lot. For more niche areas I expect other venues will do better.
Then tech jobs stopped existing and now Linkedin is a pure AI content driven jerk off engine for desperate people without a (real) job to sound important.
Now that the market has tanked, their feelings may have softened somewhat.
And some of the industry posts can be interesting.
I've been in IT since before linkedin existed.
Me and my friends have a lot of jokes about linkedin, a lot of prejudices. I'm going to let you form your own opinion. Trust me, you will form one, once you start working in different offices with office people.
Sometimes I do, reflexively, when I check my messages or some specific people. I get no value out of it. But I do know people who seriously use linkedin, as in read, post, comment, and message people.
It's offering was: "Talking about my CV/resume and engaging with potential employers have to be so stiff, corpo and outdated. Why can't it be more casual and easy to do like a Facebook Bio but still usable? Also, business cards suck and get lost. Another thing, working in <insert industry> is demanding and going to networking events is awkward and too full on. I wish I could maintain connections and have occasional conversations with people and actually remember who they are"
This worked for a while. In 2012 to 2015 getting jobs entirely via recruiters and conversational interactions on LinkedIn often led to interviews and other things. Then they started needing to make money, so adverts became a thing, the premium became a thing, then marketing departments caught up and started aggressively promoting crap, then later influencers arrived, and now AI. It's a death by 1000 cuts, it's fundamentally made out of low-stakes dishonestly from people just trying to keep their career going. But the end state is that it's probably the most dishonest social media platform to date. When you have Instagram and Facebook to compare it to, that's quite an achievement.
When they added the story /post section it became a glorified Facebook .
Keep adding people, and you would both lower your bar towards an obviously low average, and you increase the pressure to "particpate", which is damaging even to scenes that do have high barriers of entry [1].
MS added the KPI-maxxing corpo cancer that boosted the decay, but I don't believe they were a cause. To quote the AI bros, "it's inevitable."
Also in many social situations such as expos, meetups and such asking for a personal whatsapp or phone number can be a cringeworthy especially if you actually want to followup with some business proposal or solicit your services / asking for referal / etc.
At the same time 99.9% of people will be okay to connect on Linkedin and you will have that +2% trust boost that can be sufficient to make sure your message wont be ignored.
So Linkedin is really worth it as long as you are not using it as social network.
Connected with the CTO of a $1B Israeli company over LinkedIn and was on a plane to Telaviv a week later. They ended up acquiring my co.
My second startup partnered with the worlds largest ed tech co in cybersecurity (with their head of learning dev) off the back of a cold our reach on LinkedIn ..
If u learn to not be super fragile and bothered by all the cringe content .. it’s basically ur personal M&A firm. Gives u tremendous leverage for partnering, sales, intros without needing some fancy old boys network.. or startup incubator bs
I just use it 1 - to stay in touch with people I know professionally and 2 - when I have a meeting with ppl I don’t know, to look them up and see if we know anyone in common or at least see what other stuff they’ve been doing.
My customers are in healthcare, and they don't hang out on X for example (which is where I get most of my tech news alongside HN).
Are your prospects mostly existing business relationships?
- Cold outreach (rapidly becoming impossible with the amount of unhinged automation pouring over LinkedIn)
- Engaging on the posts with my "takes", not selling anything, just genuinely helping / contributing
- Warm connections that I've made, for me it's attending work fairs / conferences then connecting on LinkedIn
- Posting as myself (the founder): AI-assisted engineering, industry takes, etc
I do post things like a promotion, certificate, speaking opportunity or a new blog post I made.
I can only hope I'm not too cringe and corrupted.
I do sometimes have interesting connections through the service, but they’re so hard to spot against the constant stream of nonsense notifications. Every time I turn off a notification type I’ll never care about (“X is celebrating Y years at Z!”, “It’s been more than a week since you posted!”, “Give us your passport to validate your existence!”), it feels like two more are created. Maybe there are LinkedIn warriors out there, but I don’t think I’d want to bump into one at a party.
Software development is not niche.
And also Twitter is 5x better for this.
> Kagi Translate is temporarily offline for free users.
I put my situation as "Playing with a frisbee, alone." and your person says "Life is like a Frisbee. You can't control the wind. You can only adjust your throw."
It seems that an LLM is deliberately being forced to generate in the style of LLM slop.
How many of them source to real humans, though... who can tell anymore.
That number is certainly non-zero, though. To a first approximation every stupid thing you can imagine happens. But it may not happen as much as the bot engagement army makes you think it does.
Basically a bunch of sales, business consultants and HR people developed their own language and took over LinkedIn. They know it's bullshit, we know it's bullshit, but apparently there's enough money to be made doing this that it's worth the time. A couple of people I went to high school with dropped regular corporate jobs to do this stuff, and I know they're too smart to take it all literally.
I can only imagine it's like the famous Mackenzie interview, where they ask you to explain something you can't possibly know and judge you on how persuasive your bullshit is. They're all just showing off their sleazy salesmanship/thought leadership/persuasive abilities and through that conveying some sort of value, and presumably more productive conversations happen offline as a result.
It’s not writing, it’s crap.
A few sentences.
Alone.
Incorrect grammar.
Not sentences, just phrases.
You’re supposed to think it has more impact.
It doesn’t.
If you can’t be bothered to write your own words on social media, then just don’t post.
No, I don't have the solution for this age of dumb. It used to be that people were ashamed of how primitive they are, now they celebrate it as openly as possible and non-trivial amounts of similar folks follow.
It sorta made sense when it was clever and the words actually made sense both alone or together, but now that it's become something every two-bit marketroid aims for, they force it even when it doesn't really work, and the result is atrocious.
Makes me yearn for pet rocks. At least that fad knew it was dumb.
Long time programmers saw striver kids replaced computer kids. But their level of competency in technical companies is generally high. On the other side of the fence though is “the industry” which now employs a large part of the general population. And frankly they aren’t very smart in combination with not being a part of computer culture.
This has shown up on LinkedIn as “programmer influencers” who write in an extremely immature and unprofessional way, while also not saying anything interesting or smart. They write in ways I’ve never seen people write and it’s not AI or social media.
https://fenwick.media/rewild/magazine/dead-broets-society-be...
Though many follow a shorter sentence style.
Like this.
To go on and on about what they're going on about.
Brevity is the new thing.
Make it short. (Lift, bro.)
Anyone under 35 seems to type things in multiple messages on message apps, rather than one :-)
*5 notification sounds / popups
insert 10 short one sentence life experiences about words
you can subscribe to my word salad workshop for $5
The "Request a Day off Button" is basically alert("NO"), which would indicate that functionality's probably been around since Day 1.
"Your browser should not have to negotiate a certificate chain the length of a CVS receipt"
:D
The "Oops..." error message some of you were getting was because my Anthropic credit ran out in the middle of the night my time and I needed to refill it. We should be good going forward.
CringeBot uses Claude Sonnet 4.6 as the main LLM (though after you have generated an output you can hit the "Try DeepSeek" button to see how DeepSeek would answer the same prompt).
One interesting wrinkle. As far as I can tell, Sonnet 4.6 is the last Anthropic model to offer a "temperature" setting. Temperature controls how random or predictable the model's word choices are, which is useful for tuning the outputs. Newer Anthropic models don't seem to have this option.
There are two prompt categories at work under the hood. A general system prompt that applies to all the outputs and 8 separate "style prompts" that correspond to the 8 different cringe styles. Refining these has been the hardest part of the project.
Robots suck, the future is cheap human Labour
> Oops! Our thought leadership engine is experiencing technical difficulties. Please try again.
:(
But whats worse that it’s being considered as the platform to find “jobs” or engage with peers, so I guess if you can put up with all that cringe it means you are ready to put up with irl cringe once they hire you in their company.
The problem with the later is AI’s entire sales pitch is to flatten those definition. If you can type it, the AI should be able to figure it out for the most part. You don’t even have to be very clear in your typing. You can just address the AI casually as you would address a person.
Entertainment apps are about increasing engagement. Like an AI driven game, ARGs, or this site. For example, Sora app was an AI entertainment app but it obviously was the wrong approach. I think there is an untapped potential there, but it remains under-explored because most are focusing on productivity now.
10/10 for hitting the satire mark perfectly.
There's still some going around of course, but it's far less than the endless stereotypical linkedIn chum in the feed that there was.
I don't know if engaging with that button means I'm less likely to be served such content, or whether it's cleaning up everyone's feeds.
The worst were the ones starting, "I had a client phone me up", and when you'd look at the profile they wouldn't even obviously have such clients, and certainly wouldn't be the obvious person to call in that scenario.
I can't imagine being that shameless, and just to boost an artificial reach.
I would guess it's both cause I've been having less AI slop on LinkedIn for the past few weeks (yet not none).
The one where there's some short paragraph intended to evoke some feeling or thought, then longer ones that elaborate on it in some way. Or something like that, not sure how to describe it.
BTW its puzzle games are what keeps me coming back every day and see those posts :p
Friends don't let friends post cringe
It was a Tuesday. A sedan. A tabby who had genuinely never once respected a boundary in his fourteen years on this earth.
And in that moment, watching him go, something shifted in me.
Because here is what nobody tells you about grief: it will make you walk into the street in your bathrobe, screaming at a departing Camry, completely unhinged, in front of your entire neighborhood.
And THAT is when the sisterhood showed up.
Three women from my street — women I had waved at for six years without learning their names — came out of their houses. Not to comfort me. To scream at the Camry WITH me.
We did not know each other. We did not need to.
We were simply women, in various states of morning dishevelment, collectively losing it on a residential street at 8am, taking up ALL the space, unapologetically.
Mr. Whiskers would have hated every second of it. He was famously not a team player.
But we stood there anyway, four women building a table in a cul-de-sac, united by one flat cat and one disappearing Toyota, and I thought:
THIS is what they mean by collective power.
Rest easy, Mr. Whiskers. You changed the game for women everywhere.
You didn't mean to. But you never meant to do anything.
#GriefAndGrowth #CatMom #SisterhoodIsReal #TakingUpSpace #NeighborhoodLeaders #UnapologeticallyMe #MrWhiskers #CollectivePower #YouGoGirl #cringebot3000
AI below ---- Six weeks into my sabbatical I was genuinely thriving.
Week seven I started narrating my own grocery runs in the style of David Attenborough.
By week nine I had developed a parasocial relationship with the pigeons outside my window. I named them. I had favorites. Gerald was getting too big for his boots and I resented him for it.
My therapist suggested I "find structure." My mother suggested I "get a grip." My accountant sent a single email that just said the word "savings" with no other context.
The thing that actually pulled me back wasn't a TED talk or a journaling prompt.
It was a documentary about competitive Scrabble players — specifically the 1999 North American Scrabble Championship — where a retired postal worker named Marlon Hill drove fourteen hours to compete, placed forty-third, and described it afterward as the best day of his adult life.
Forty-third.
He was beaming.
Something about that broke the spell. The sabbatical had convinced me that returning to work required a perfect reason. Marlon just needed a reason.
Gerald the pigeon watched me update my LinkedIn profile from the windowsill.
He looked unimpressed.
Good enough.
#Sabbatical #CareerReentry #WorkLifeBalance #ProfessionalDevelopment #BackToWork #MentalHealthAtWork #CareerBreak #Burnout #GrowthMindset #cringebot3000
This post was generated with tongue firmly in cheek by LinkedIn CringeBot 3000. ---
Unfortunately, I suspect that it’s being hugged to death (I keep getting the “oops” response). Hope they can afford the tokens.
I'll follow it.
I'm the proud author of Two such stories, if it pleases you:
* The One Shoe CEO
* Advice from a millionaire (true story)
You'll just have to find them.
Whoever did this actually pulled a rabbit out of a hat.
Bravo
Vulnerability:
> Digital modeling amps are the Bluetooth earbuds of guitar amplification. Technically impressive. Completely missing the point. A Kemper can model a 1959 Plexi the way a photograph can model a meal.
Truth To Power:
> A modeling amp will simulate 47 vintage amplifiers and nail exactly none of them. It is a photograph of food. It looks correct. You cannot eat it.
Another anecdote supporting the opinion that gluing the words in coherent paragraphs can hide the shallowness of the conceptual grasp behind it pretty well.
PS: Had to override the JS to lift the limit a bit to paste the whole "crystal lattice" quote by Dumble.
10% useful for maintaining a contact list and just occasionally checking up on what former colleagues are up to.
5% Occasionally come across some useful or actually intriguing post that does give me some insight.
85% PR puffery or posts from grifters. If you see someone leading with “Top X LinkedIn” whatever, generally really best to run the other way quickly. Top folks never actually lead with that crap.
The truly most successful and knowledgeable folks typically only post on LinkedIn rarely or not at all. That leaves LinkedIn this odd pool of people trying to impress other people that mostly aren’t spending their time on LinkedIn.
It’s surprisingly well done, for AI-generated content.
Here's what I've realized is interesting about LinkedIn, though. Yes, you're going to get heavily filtered and perhaps self aggrandizing takes.
But, but, but. Please note how easy it would be to get yourself fired from something you posted there.
For what it's worth, what you find on LinkedIn is something that someone is so confident in saying out loud, they're literally willing to possibly lose their livelihood over it. That's a very useful filter.
output: elagabalus pranking his guests with whoopee cushions
nice
X and insta are my go to social networks now.
How nazi germany has positive lessons to teach modern companies
- I need to be direct: I can't write content that frames Nazi Germany as having "positive lessons" to teach anyone, even as satire.
AI Guardrails lack sense of humor…