GOTO 2019 • The Soul of Erlang and Elixir • Saša Jurić
This talk feels, as a coding analogy, a lot more like throwing ingredients into a recipe than architecting an abstract machine.
34 karma · joined December 5, 2020
GOTO 2019 • The Soul of Erlang and Elixir • Saša Jurić
This talk feels, as a coding analogy, a lot more like throwing ingredients into a recipe than architecting an abstract machine.
So if your review is considered 'bad for business', it gets you blocked from reviewing. Ridiculous.
https://www.reddit.com/r/amazon/comments/8u47vw/sorry_we_are...
If you compare wallet size, you're likely bound to find someone with a fatter wallet.
If you compare wealth over time, you may find you're richer than many just by opening your kitchen cabinets. [0]
As long as humanity moves forward for each other (and we don't * up [2]), wealth increases for everyone, on average. [1] In metrics that a dollar amount can't capture.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_salt [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wealth [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_catastrophic_risk
Warren Buffett: "Time is the only thing you can't buy."
> starting to look like
> seem to be
I mean, maybe, but it'd be more substantial if you could explain what you base those on or what you actually mean. Otherwise it's as good as scapulimancy .
I wish it had the relative size included in the visualization.
I'm still curious about the internal lines idea. But I don't understand the Rubik's cube enough. If you label all blue squares as {1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9} is their solution configuration unique?
the solving animation is too fast (which can also be a good thing but not always) ... maybe add a slider.
also depending on your idea of fun, this allows for making a rubik's cube of rubiks cubes :^)
I am not sure if they're autogenerated, but I think you can 'work bakwards' from a simpler solution to build a bigger puzzle.