ice109

...that's even closer to the style that fast compilation lends itself to

that's a trick though - no one uses interpreters like that. for most people they're for experimentation, which is exactly what i was saying i'm able to do with go.

yes

>Dyson never got his PhD degree.

>By the way, do you know that there is a series in scattering theory in quantum mechanics called Dyson series?

indeed i do; i studied it in perturbation theory in undergrad.

>To be frank, I doubt if you know this.

this isn't grammatically correct. "i doubt you know this/that".

do you know how much a slice of bread costs?

https://terrytao.wordpress.com/career-advice/there%E2%80%99s...

but i don't agree with this

>also what people call business logic often means fetching data from the db, processing it in some way and returning it. This is what views are for, they are definitions, so there's nothing to test there, except performance maybe.

i see business logic as things that connect disparate parts of the domain. not all of my business is in my db. a lot of it is somewhere else, in someone else's db, accessible only through their api. like i said in my op: unless you want to hack postgres (or whatever rdbms) into a full-fledged general use dev environment you're not going to be able to marshal all of these disparate resources.

forgive me if i don't take this meta-analysis seriously.

https://stackoverflow.com/a/41578645/6767912

and this

https://github.com/NuGet/Home/issues/2880

tells me it's not production ready (yes i've even tried compiling mono from source).

indeed

functional language with hoards of issues

>TypeScript

javascript

>F#

essentially vendor locked to windows

tenet