Train your own LLM - https://github.com/angelos-p/llm-from-scratch
HN Discussion - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48017948
863 karma · joined December 9, 2019
Train your own LLM - https://github.com/angelos-p/llm-from-scratch
HN Discussion - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48017948
Where can I find these TUI applications to look at?
Recommended Reading: [0]
[0] https://geohot.github.io/blog/jekyll/update/2025/10/15/pathe...
Some of the basic apps like Jetbrains it could barely run it. At best it was crashing frequently for me.
Play Store Review and everything takes weeks sometimes and I can't tolerate that.
I happened to have stumbled upon here to compare those terminals on this site: https://terminaltrove.com/terminals/
Looks pretty useful to me or anyone else that wants to compare terminals.
"Market cap stories (and price fluctuation stories generally) mostly aren't substantive enough to make interesting HN threads. They just turn into generic discussions about the underlying company or currency or whatever, and those are too repetitive to be interesting."
This one is no exception, with such threads should also apply to this one. Just like it did with Tesla and Facebook about them reaching $1TN. Right?
It is essentially a 'horse race story'.
It has been months since I applied for that and I'm starting to think it is either a demoware product or at worse vapourware, unless someone else has access to Claude and has used it?
Is anyone else in the same boat?
Correct. Malware and trojans, everywhere will be unleashed on the average user and will make the crypto wallet an obvious target for scammers and criminals to take payment with and steal the users crypto.
Wallets will be drained via modified, cracked apps or hack tools connecting to dodgy smart contracts, and payment providers will be using anonymous cryptocurrencies like Zcash, monero, mobilecoin (used in signal messenger) etc.
I can only see nothing but the same security issues on the desktop, but now made worse on phones enabling side-loading or alternative app stores.
So the 'call my bank' option won't work here and wire transfer is no different to transferring money in crypto as they are both irreversible.
But I don't know how entering a .eth/.sol/etc address or scanning a QR code to send USDC over is harder than typing in the sort code, account number, IBAN number, etc to do a wire transfer.
Am I? Or didn't I just say 'There's just too many to list here' and just listed the notable examples.
> The people operating darknet markets are not Nazis, extremists, and generally not hitmen and terrorists.
So who operated those Tor nodes and services of multiple darknet websites in [0] and [1]? Another cybercriminal.
> I've never looked for reliable citations or personally verified.
Talking about 'movings goal posts' and missing the whole 'anonymity' point of Tor. Only time will tell, but so far a great use case for criminals, extremists and terrorists using it.
[0] https://www.nbcnews.com/technolog/how-anonymous-tor-users-co...
[1] https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/02/08/349016/a-dark-we...
Not really.
I recognize that the same criminals can also use the wider internet too, however there are central authorities and regulators in different countries that have laws that regulate the internet in the countries that they are in and these criminals will be caught very quickly if they tried.
The difference is that Tor only makes it more harder to trace, hence the appeal to criminals, extremists and terrorists to use it for their illegal activities which that is its unintended use case after promising 'privacy' and 'anonymity' for 'everyone'.
So yes, that is it's 'decentralised' road to hell indeed.
[0] https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/02/08/349016/a-dark-we...
[1] https://www.computerworld.com/article/2845616/biggest-ever-t...
But where did I exactly say 'ban' it?
Please attack and critique the 'alleged' state of the art blockchains of today that don't use PoW.
Once again, only attacking the easiest examples in the blockchain industry (which use PoW). Everyone knows that Bitcoin, and Ethereum are both destroying the planet. Not all cryptocurrencies are the same as those two and many do not use PoW today.
It's very easy to criticise the environmental impacts of the first commercial petrol car and use that as an argument to say that all cars should not be used or that cars will not change the world, since petrol cars are more hostile to the environment.
The author is doing the same thing, but generalising and bundling all cryptocurrencies having the same environmental negatives as PoW cryptocurrencies (Including Bitcoin, and Ethereum).
> Tesla became the fifth company to surpass a market value of $1 trillion on 25 October, behind Apple, Microsoft, Amazon and Google-owner Alphabet.
Complete fake news and misleading. Facebook Inc. (aka Meta) was the fifth that surpassed and closed beyond $1TN before Tesla Inc did, making Tesla the sixth trillion-dollar company. From CNBC [0] > Facebook closed above $1 trillion in market capitalization for the first time on Monday. The social media company is the fifth U.S. company to hit the milestone, joining Apple, Microsoft, Amazon and Google-parent company Alphabet.
Disappointing BBC Online news once again.[0] https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/28/facebook-hits-trillion-dolla...
It already was beyond that before the stock split in August last year. [0]
[0] https://www.cnbc.com/2020/08/11/tesla-announces-five-for-one...
However from [0]:
> Market cap stories (and price fluctuation stories generally) mostly aren't substantive enough to make interesting HN threads. They just turn into generic discussions about the underlying company or currency or whatever, and those are too repetitive to be interesting.
So is this going to get flagged down then?
This is the reason why companies like Coinbase and Basecamp stay away from politics in the workplace and focus on being a mission-focused company.
Companies like Netflix are not on your side and are on the side of profit. They will remove anyone to save themselves from compromising the company.
Compare that to 13 days ago, MSFT was the second company to reach $2TN [0].
But that seemed to be fine by the HN crowd to be 'interesting' enough to discuss about even though I find that unsurprising and less worthy of attention than Facebook being the first and fastest $1TN company founded in the 21st century.
Since each of their IPOs, it took AAPL and MSFT 3 decades to reach $1TN. For FB? Less than a decade.
So the news of both Apple, Microsoft [0] [1] is fine but not Facebook? [2] It seems dang doesn't understand the gravity of this milestone for a public company like Facebook.
[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27621539
Simply show me a video logging into the account in real time with the given password and the 'hacker' can eliminate this skepticism.
Quite funny how people can quickly believe this stuff on the internet without thinking again, especially from...
BBC online news... sigh.