If you're going to make such a wild statement where the laws are against you any any Google search of hours is against you, you've got to give a much longer and in depth explanation.
2,214 karma · joined March 23, 2015
If you're going to make such a wild statement where the laws are against you any any Google search of hours is against you, you've got to give a much longer and in depth explanation.
LLMs are often wrong and you cannot check their sources. Also since it is generated you can trick it into spitting out falsehoods intentionally.
They are not even close.
The reason proposed is that if the environment is loud, you won't be bothered by additional noise from the fans.
This is disgusting extortioniate behavior that would make me reconsider doing business with Vercel.
Disgusting behavior.
He is talking about the ruling class with power over all of us, so they should have more oversight than any normal person.
Does every dev need to write the same line now? Or should your one-liner be a library?
The basics that everybody needs, should be standardized in the standard library.
Somebody did something the straightforward way which worked. A solution is given on a better way, but that also has a problem that somebody else didn't know about.
Bash let's you do anything and have it kind of work but you never know how many footguns you're setting up for yourself.
The reason to use c++ is for low level performance, but it's not 2005, you can now get the same performance with modern languages that give increased safety, developer velocity, readability, maintainability, and more.
But we all went away from this because pure OO is also pitfall riddled and extremely clunky and overly verbose and repetitive at a large scale.
The answer is a more functional style, partial application and immutability solves so much of what people are talking about, but nobody wants to learn to use functional languages.
https://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/displays-animations-when-acci...
Personally I have sl aliased to sl=sl && ls to make sure I break the habit of ever typing sl.
(Though also usually I'm typing ll which I have aliased to an ls with list mode and many details)
In this case, the lame corporate kind of people.
I'm not a fan of these privately owned social media platforms with no oversight, fairness, or recourse for the public, but people want corporate social media and I'm not sure what these giants are supposed to do or what people even want here.
A good reviewer should have, even for a binary test case, asked the submitter to simplify it to the smallest or most basic binary required for the functionality.
I would argue it's the other way around. Mercurial is a better source control system, and was a close contender with git back then. However, GitHub winning the hosting war and also being all in on git is what cemented git as the leader. Bitbucket was hosting both and with a more generous free plan, but they didn't win the social and UX fight so git became the de facto standard since that's what you used on the cool good new platform.
I wish any large company agreed with this. I've worked for a company that on boarded every single new engineer to a very niche language (F#) in a few days. Also, everybody I worked with there was amazing. Probably because of that kind of mindset.
Meanwhile google tiptoes around teams adopting kotlin because "oh no, what if other teams touching the code might not be able to read it". Google is supposed to be hiring the brightest but internally is worried the brightest can't review slightly-different-java.
It's shocking how everybody acts like senior engineers might need months to learn a new language. Sure, maybe for some esoteric edge cases, but 5 mins on https://learnxinyminutes.com/ should get you 80% of the way there, and an afternoon looking at big projects or guidelines/examples should you another 18% of the way.