212 karma · joined November 6, 2023
https://www.phoronix.com/news/Intel-Hinge-Driver-Linux-5.12
The sensor angle would be in a file like `/sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:device*/in_angl0_raw` (device number can vary). At least I have this in a config file and remember it working (maybe on a different computer?). I cannot get it to work anymore on my laptop.
Comparison of solar share:
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/solar-share-energy?tab=li...
Solar potential:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_in_Iceland#/media/File:...
> MuZero only masks legal actions at the root of the search tree where the environment can be queried, but does not perform any masking within the search tree. This is possible because the network rapidly learns not to predict actions that never occur in the trajectories it is trained on.
It uses a bit simpler approach, only detecting movement, but it works good enough for such games.
The reason is mostly that it is too hard to make it work under transformations and compositing, while higher resolution screens are a better solution for anyone who cares enough.
Getting the correct final answer tells you nothing about the reasoning. The LLM will solve the puzzle even if you only pass it the sentence "the [] de Milo is discovered by a Greek []".
https://github.com/brunopostle/piranesi
The problem is that it is a method for projecting a rectangle, not a full 3D scene. I can imagine though that it could be extended to a full projection if you specify a central axis along which the perspective trick happens.
Can you say more about what these small mistakes were? Would they affect the interpretation of the law?
No that does not follow, but the very first individuals who migrated to America (the humans this discussion is about) obviously were not born in America. By my logic there were no native Americans that came from Asia to America, but their descendants became native.
Yes I know, very pedantic. I don't think there is anything wrong with the title.
But why would anyone put AI generated images into an Email?
The source you link very explicitly contradicts that:
> Your eCall system is only activated if your vehicle is involved in a serious accident. The rest of the time the system remains inactive. This means that when you are simply driving your vehicle, no tracking (registering your car's position or monitoring your driving) or transmission of data takes place.
More important to me is whether it was written because someone really cared about the topic, or wrote 100s of pages of nothing to have a title.
But I also want to comment on your idea that researching AI is superior to researching dancing because it is more beneficial for humanity. I am myself in AI adjacent research, but I still disagree. Dancing is a deeply human thing, and we should care about it. And I believe that many people (especially outside of this bubble) will think that many parts of currently hyped AI research has very questionable "benefit for humanity", such as AI image generators.
That's the missing assumption. I would say assuming that people are perfectly random falls into the "standardized test" category.
> you won't get information, and you should still always switch and win 2/3 of the time.
You always get some information, the set of possible results becomes narrower, so saying the probabilities don't change is not sufficient. Not a good idea to discuss the problem in informal language though.