No shit?
Truly you are one of the great minds of our times.
13 karma · joined January 8, 2013
No shit?
Truly you are one of the great minds of our times.
If you flunk the interview, try challenging the interviewer to a dance-off. If you win, the job is yours!
It's tempting. I'm not sure I could endure the social stigma of being a sperm donor, though.
I didn't read the article, though.
Presumably Perl 6 will be ready by that point. If you get "left behind," you can always while away the time writing Perl 6 programs, whilst waiting for the Seven Angels of the Bowl to pour out their plagues upon the Earth.
P.S. The name of the Perl language is a biblical reference to the "pearl of great price" from Matthew 13:46. Srsly.
It's hard to imagine a real-world parallel to this kind of behavior. It would be like if rape was a socially acceptable form of greeting.
In the future, I think all of this will give Microsoft a perfect excuse to shut down the independent application developers and force everything through their app store. Companies that develop for Windows better start thinking hard about their relationship with Microsoft.
http://www.generalist.org.uk/blog/2011/jstor-where-does-your...
Of course earning money by itself isn't an evil thing. The bigger problem is that JSTOR is part of a system which many people have come to feel is unjust-- a system whereby the public finances research which is then put behind paywalls.
It isn't just wild-eyed hackers who feel this way. Even Donalth Knuth has commented about how little value the academic journals really provide, and how much they charge.
It is the public who pays for this system. We pay because our taxes and tuition money subsidize the research that we're not allowed to see. The government should require publicly funded research to be made available on a site like arxiv.org. It is those guys who are really in favor of open access, not JSTOR. Throwing us a bone-- some 80-year old manuscripts which are in the public domain anyway-- shouldn't obscure that.