hueving

Yep, ad money has suddenly dried up and auction prices have plummeted so might as well give away the ad credits to inflate the auction prices allowing both a higher tax deduction and better looking performance.

>It's ridiculous that Google has to

It doesn't have to. This is a choice Google is making on how it wants to conduct charity.

>The federal government should be providing interest-free working capital and guaranteeing the sale of every glove and mask

Sale at what price? It has to be bounded or else it sounds ripe for fraud (people are monsters).

> anyone can produce.

So is the loan for anyone that wants it? Or just for companies that have proven they can make gloves and masks? If the former, what stops people from just using the loan to fund salaries while making a ritual display of making masks for a few months and then declaring bankruptcy after collecting salaries during that time?

>It's like when people build a house next to an airport, and then complain about all the damn airplane noise.

Not really. Buying near an airport requires explicit acknowledgement that you're doing it and that's why homeowners don't really have a leg to stand on when they complain to their local government. IIRC last time I looked at a home near a bunch of transmitters, there was no such disclosure required.

It works when it's just software that you can support on your own later (open source). It doesn't work when it's SaaS.

> still less loud than any restaurant in the US

Sounds like you might need to try some restaurants in the US. It's more than McDonald's and TGI Fridays.

It's Tempe, not Temple and the neighborhood doesn't exist yet. Just announced recently.

The tax is not based on living in it. Nor is it based on the space it consumes.

Said everyone during a bull market

>For a value that includes the bigger perspective on our culture

Sure

> and what it means to live a good life

That's just self-aggrandizing bullshit. There is no class that will tell you what it means to live a good life. Anyone who thinks so is dearly lacking perspective.

>an exclusive focus on STEM is indeed 'super specialized'.

An exclusive focus on STEM will include the philosophy of science and what it means to seek truths about the physical world. IMO that has immensely more value in a philosophical sense than you seem to imply.

Most STEM courses aren't vocational training and aren't super specialized. I think you might have a biased negative view for what STEM courses are?

Edit: Let me state it a different way that might shed more light on my point. A CS major can pass all of his/her classes with a perfect GPA and still be incapable of writing software ready for a production system (even at small scale).

The STEM degrees emphasize fundamentals that are rarely (if ever) used in day-to-day "real jobs".

Well nobody tried to use lead-acid batteries for storage of anything on the significance of grid base-load and replacing a huge chunk of transportation energy capacity.

Yeah, $2 trillion is the ballpark. Link for those curious: https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/030915/what-percent...

> that capital is a positive feedback loop

This requires a lot of the investment environment that isn't a given. Capital loses its feedback loop if inflation outpaces economic growth or if the quality of investment opportunities declines significantly.

There is no given that just having $10 million dollars means it will be easy to outpace inflation and not end up with less.

That's not how consumption taxes work: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consumption_tax

A property tax takes effect without sales occurring, without the property being used, etc. There is no act of consumption to tax, other than simply existing. And before anyone argues that the use of the land is the consumption, that would only make sense if the value of the house wasn't taken into account as part of the property tax.

If property taxes were only levied at the time of sale (e.g. stamp duty in Australia), then it would be fair to call it a consumption tax.

Is it? The main difference is additional connectors and access control filters. Both are not really hard from a technology standpoint.

> the hardware would be sitting there sleeping. Probably not very cost-effective for enterprises.

Not to be condescending, but idle hardware isn't even on the radar as far as waste goes in enterprises. An on-prem solution that is idle for 364 days of the year is completely fine for most of these companies.

For the ones that do care, that's what they make virtual machines and over-subscription for if they even care the slightest about that.

The post is about Norway.

>the actual important pages that people want to use?

Where is this special list of important pages? Are the sites I want to use not important? Does your comment need to be so simultaneously defeatist and hostile?

>What is the current cost today of putting high quality, wild meat on the table along with seasonally ripe and fresh fruit? What about high quality beer with no use of malt substitutes?

Still easily within reach of anyone but the poor. Sounds like pretty standard yuppie organic restaurant material.

People that want to stop drunk driving would disagree. Taxis are way to unreliable in the vast majority of US cities to be used as transport to/from a dinner with drinks.

That's very invasive. I keep all of my underwear in there in the summer.

Cool story. Nothing to do with body building.

That's effectively quack science. I'd love to be proven otherwise with evidence, but I've seen nothing that shows people spending an hour a day outperforming people who do not in mental tasks.

Devoting your life to software does not imply burnout. There are companies that reward you for giving a shit (see many startups).

Point to me the group of brilliant engineers that have the bodies of body builders.

I'm not saying they won't be in shape, I'm saying that someone who has an abnormally muscular body is clearly dedicating a non trivial portion of their life to it.

You don't know my intent. My point is that most of the people that bitch about Phoenix are fine with the existence of Los Angeles. The remaining bit are too dumb to realize it's more energy efficient than the heat suckers of the North.

Please explain how you think Celcius is objectively better than Fahrenheit. For the layperson the only difference is that Celcius requires decimal points to distinguish between temperatures you can feel and has a simple water boiling and freezing poin

Back to the larger point: if your argument is that it's similar to comparing German and English, you've lost. Bringing it down to effectively a language barrier means it's obviously not worth any switching cost for a few minor conveniences.

You missed the point. The FAA will allow government surveillance but not criminal orgs.

>Non-metric units are objectively worse.

The word you're looking for is "subjectively". There are lots of aesthetic reasons to like the metric system but realistically the best one is the one you have internalized.

As a Phoenix resident, the water relevant to you is the Colorado river. You are along for the same boat ride as southern California and Las Vegas.

You're even slightly advantaged over those other two because of the aquifer under Phoenix.

Water from the city comes from the CAP. The reservoir is filled as needed from that and there isn't a crisis there. You can ban as many glasses of water from restaurants as you want and it won't make the slightest difference. Just slightly more CAP water will be flooded out to farmland.