I think your response to the previous poster highlights your victim mentality. And they do not have a duty to entertain you - nobody cares if their conversation bores you. You seem very self-centered and having mental issues. Perhaps this is likely to have shaped your skewed perspective of an otherwise reasonable education system.
Consider that for the small convenience of using the same currency and health service of other countries those very fee times that you travel, your country has given up sovereignty. It seems like the capricious desires of cheap-flight digital nomads have been traded for something as fundamental as sovereignty.
But not if you look at this from the liberal ideology perspective. They are building the foundation to have Japanese people accept immigration. So, this sort of propaganda must be repeated as nauseum.
But that may also be way of waging war. In fact, the US did the same on Bagadad. Why you lamenting that? I don't understand it. Are you complaining that they may not be following the Geneva Convention's rule? How about Gitmo? There are no rules. The only apparent rules are those that are pushed louder by the media propaganda. As the West currently excels in that, you have the impression that those are the rules. But they would change them quickly and feed you some other "rules" if those would not suit them equally well. And most of the "war crimes" they fed you probably never happen. Lies, lies, lies. The only different you can make to your life is whether you are going to believe them or question them. After Vietnam, Korea, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libia, and Syria, you still believe them? Have they brainwashed you so badly?
Your last (ironic) statement is interesting. In the same vein, America's use of nuclear weapons to stop Japan made the world a worst place. Or America's attack on the Taliban made the world a worst place. Not everything that has the potential for destruction is intrinsically bad. The police has guns, but they use them to protect you. Russia has tactical nuclear weapons and it is using them to protect the rest of the world from the American's liberal ideology that is trying to start WW3. I would be interested in your point of view.
Yours is an interesting take. Do you mean that Russia is afraid of the consequences of hitting NATO? Do you mean they are afraid NATO could attack it and destroy their country? I am not sure that may be the case. Ultimately, they did go ahead with their SMO in Ukraine. They are fighting, dying, and do not seem afraid of war. NATO, to the contrary, does not seem to have the leadership to take up a real war, besides their many hysterical Russophobic leaders, especially in the Baltics and Eastern Europe. Could it be that Russia may assess a large war as highly likely and is biding its time to build more weapons and prepare for it? Because that is a very valid alternative to your hypothesis.
To the contrary. Credit to India for standing up to the liberal fascist American empire that has spread misery and death over the past decades. It’s pay back time. Come and see.
Just as much as they interfere in other countries’ affairs. Like Georgia right now. While they forced their populace to wear a mask or lose their livelihood, so the mask has come off on the fascist European elites.
Perhaps you are right, but why should they do anything different when all the other countries are trying to do exactly the same? The US just unilaterally extended their border in the arctic.
The choice of words is important. It’s appealing to the West propaganda machine to represent conflict within the Russian power structures. They use the word ‘sacking’ because their western leaders would exercise their prerogative to power and do just that (the “democratic” ones). To their disappointment, Shoigu was promoted to head of security services, while being replaced by someone with more experience of economic management. This is part of their strategy of integrating their military complex into the economy. The West should read this as: “our military power is here to stay and increase further.”
Interestingly, just like after WWII the American MIC had to manufacture wars to justify its existence, it’ll be interesting to see where the new Russian military capacity we will focus after this war. Africa for sure, to arm it against the European colonial powers. But who knows what other places. France is going to be well pissed off))
Makes you think whether to feel sorry for the indoctrinated masses that will be sent to be slaughtered in the coming elites’ was against Russia, or they deserve it for failing to turn on the grey mass between their ears. Are humans ultimately responsible for their fate?
To the contrary. Let’s hope he is just talking. He’s talking madness. He’s talking WW3. So I sure hope he’s just talking. And you better hope that too.
The headline is biased. It paints Russia under a bad light. “Due to ideological disagreements between two competing geopolitical blocks, and the ensuing conflicts, part of Northern Europe is currently subject to GSP jamming”. We should not allow the whole nation and people of Russia to be subject to this smear campaign. Even if you do not like them. Because it’s wrong. And you would not want one day the same to be done to you. Because by the way things are going, there is the potential for the “good guys” to end up being on the receiving side.
This avatar appears to be of an ethnicity that does not represent the majority of Ukrainians. Which I think it should have been, since the messages are supposed to come from the government of Ukraine, I.e. its people (assuming they are still a democracy after banning of opposition parties). Is this an attempt at appease the liberal ideologies of their supporters? If this is a sign of things to come, I would warn the Ukrainians to think twice about joining “the West”. Perhaps it’s too late though.
It’s great to hear that fomenting wars abroad at the cost of other people’s life is good for your economy. I hope this helps you raise your income so you can buy those new tires for your truck.