5.4 Extra high >> Opus 4.6
107 karma · joined January 24, 2014
5.4 Extra high >> Opus 4.6
(That's what held me back most for spending more effort on shortcuts.)
Step 2: build on someone else's infrastructure innovations with zero acknowledgement.
Step 3: Write a blog post with "unprecedented" and "100x" and "trillions" in the first paragraph.
Seriously, this seems like cool work and enjoyed the post. But my basic trust in them has completely tanked.
The myopathy among us "online people" is assuming number of voices here and elsewhere correlate to revenue.
It does not.
``` "hooks": { "Notification": [ { "hooks": [ { "type": "command", "command": "jq '.message' | say" } ] } ] } ```
tl;dr (aka ChatGPT's pitch) ... This whitepaper delivers a sharp, data-backed framework for measuring and maximizing the ROI of operational efficiency—equipping leaders with a precise, KPI-driven model, a Monte Carlo-powered NPV simulator, and a tactical 8-week rollout plan. From latency in team alignment to automation payback periods, it translates abstract process friction into financial outcomes with scientific rigor. If you're serious about optimizing internal systems with the same precision you apply to product development, this document is your blueprint.
I'm curious what gaps you see in firm operation software?
I work in legal tech and from what I've seen all of the software focuses on tasks and artifacts (e.g. the many AI letter drafters) as opposed to holistically understanding / optimizing business operation.
Does this fit your sense of the software landscape? Are there other opportunities here beyond case management etc?
Objectively and utterly wrong.