What is proposed is to not have an OOM killer with a selection process, meaning that the "someone other allocates" would be the one dying.
193 karma · joined June 22, 2011
We always advise our employees to request an exception for it. We are pretty relaxed about it, but we don't give out a blanket exception
`s` is actually one of the SI base units: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_System_of_Units#...
edit: actually, month should never be used for the case described anyway... 28-31 days?
Data for in-active users gets deleted because our clickhouse retention policy is lower than the in-active-user timeout
My personal weight-loss (and now sports) is largely based on understanding how the human body works with metabolism.. carbs, fat, protein.. nice and geeky
1a: Not allowed provided because of AGPL (though would be allowed if it is GPL)
1b: Allowed, provided it is purely internal (as described here: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#InternalDistributi... )
1c: Not allowed (this is a distribution, and actually is also in violation of general GPL)
1d: Not allowed, linking against the library means using it, which means GPL violation.
2: If (x) is licenses as MIT and does not contain AGPL underneath (it shouldn't, they are not compatible), you can take X under that MIT license. Regardless of actual repository layout.
3: Penalty is a pretty grey area, and this is a civil suite, not a criminal suite. As a result it goes into damages etc
4: I reckon EFF etc. Look for "GPL enforcement" (AGPL is not very different)
5: You can try.. but I reckon only in the discovery etc for a lawsuit a judge can force them to give access to the source-code to verify your claim.
For all intents and purposes, AGPLv3 is GPLv3 with the addendum that distribution also covers "As a Service". Also.. at our company we completely banned AGPL because we simply don't want to deal with any potential violations. So I reckon 1b in your example would also not happen in a place like Facebook (I reckon all 4 companies have an AGPL ban in place :) )
- The entire organization uses a single framework (and improves on it), which will lead to a bunch of teams grumbling that "We are only using X because of organizational pressure, while Y is much better"
- You leave freedom to the org to pick their technology, and hope/steer people towards certain parts. But you will have to accept some divergence from the norm
I prefer the second org, and luckily I am in such a place where we can use Go while the team next to us is on Scala, and we weigh in-house developed technology against publicly available technology on ROI.
For people actually working with JVM and the languages on top of it, nobody really is worried about Oracle. The way the licensing is set up, they just don't have enough power to coerce people to use their version. It would kind of be like the SCO case if they came after it. I think they went after Google for Android simply to protect their IP, and that one they even "lost" (which detracts also from their possible future lawsuit on enforcing Java licensing)
Overall pretty useful site!
Good find though, and embarrassing failure. Especially since most eBay properties have penetration testing and automated scanners being run on them
Probably hard to fix backwards compatible though...
We disabled leap-seconds at work in our NTP servers, and just use the normal mechanisms to compensate slowly.
Maybe NSA is doing something undiscovered, but this feels more like sensationalism then realism. I'm sure they have a lot of storage and can probably rival google on data storage, but I doubt they have some sort of magic god-like storage and search facility