Either way the article is pretty worthless and anyone holding BTC would obviously like to encourage others to buy and drive up the price.
1,735 karma · joined January 24, 2013
Either way the article is pretty worthless and anyone holding BTC would obviously like to encourage others to buy and drive up the price.
IMO the answer is that it's very hard to build reliable robots + AI even in simple environments and AVs are still very dependant on the driver. The size of the potential market if it pays off is huge but removing the driver completely is going to take a long time.
Overall from reading the abstract it seems like a pretty obvious conclusion. Same applies to robotics where the only successful cases are very constrained.
It has recently occured to me to ask why we have decided to try solve autonomous driving before solving any other seemingly easier robotics problems. Other than robo-vacuums, which aren't particularly complex, we have jumped straight to trying to solve one of the hardest unconstrained robotics and AI challenges in automotive environments.
edit: Getting downvoted, if you disagree could you reply with why?
People here seem to optimize for low effort more than their time. Same reason why people stand on escalators. If they cared about time they'd walk up it.
Recent Werner Herzog interview talking about interviewing Gorbachev. He discusses a little about the Yeltsin years following and puts Putin's popularity in context of how bad things were during Yeltsin's term. Worth a listen if you have 20 minutes.
The back button being furthest place away from the thumb on the iPhone was another thing that never made sense. I think ppl just get used to it but a lot of the good design is really good marketing.
> Autonomous Driving Inside the Heart
HN title is different from the article and frankly terrifying given the state of autonomous driving
For anyone from the UK, using Nick Clegg as a representative to help improve FBs reputation seems laughable.
> asking companies to limit executive bonuses that award short-term accomplishments.
Why would I care as an investor? I still want the stock to go up quickly. Executives own stock and without a cash bonus wouldn't this incentive trying to get quick increases in stock value.
> more disclosure to investors about meeting key milestones and plans, and reward long-term shareholders by giving them more voting power the longer they hold the stock
Seems relatively minor vs the benefits of a stock jumping significantly in a short time. As a minor stock holder I have no interest in voting power. There still isn't a downside to short term deals.
This is not 'a work only when you want' job. People do it full time to feed their families and after doing it for years find it difficult to move to a different role for a variety of factors. I'm sure they would go get a better paying job elsewhere if it was easy.
It used to be a 40 hour job when they joined but Uber/Lyft have gradually reduced earnings. Now it's 60-70 hour a week job. That's the problem. The gig work/contractor aspect of Uber/Lyft is a smokescreen to avoid paying minimum wage. The drivers are doing it because they have to but the work conditions are pretty bad. Hence the strike.