515 karma · joined February 13, 2018
A bit speculative reply but would appreciate if anybody links any such analysis'/investigations.
From my limited knowledge, I know people have been shorting Tesla based on fundamentals for a while now but haven't been successful.
We are able to cleanly separate facts from non-facts (for the most part). This is what LLM are trying to replicate now.
Just think of the speciality in which you aren't an expert, javascript/storage/networking ...
This is not true at all. I have never worked on games and it will take me quite a while (even months) to write a "basic" game. While I know a lot of good practices about software development and decade+ of FAANG experience, I don't know the intricacies or even the basics of game development.
I recently experienced this for a different usecase. As an experienced backend developer, I wanted to automate some javascript/browser stuff. I tried on my own for 2-3 days and had couple of prototypes but nothing actually worked. I spent 2 hours with an AI and I had a working solution. We even iterated together quickly and solved some runtime issues and the solution is working for me seamlessly now.
So, I definitely see value of AI even for coding for experienced developers like myself.
This seems pretty undesirable. Very easy for Airbnb/third party to increase prices even without demand just to increase their prices.
We recently saw a similar price fixing lawsuit for renters. Landlords, co-ordinating together, ended up increasing prices of Condos across major American cities (via means of a third party). The consumer ends up paying unnecessarily high prices in an inelastic market.
Being technically right for an aspect that doesn't matter is a common trope that a lot of software engineers fall for.
I was thinking about upgrading this year but I am now thinking of waiting another year since there are no immediate problems.
Its an interesting interview question at the very least. (More complications arise as and how you get deeper into the ice).
Shareholders have no option. Larry + Sergey are still majority shareholders iirc.
2. for an experienced software developer (10+ years) transitioning to strategic roles (i.e. TL of multiple business areas)?
3. for someone looking to be less head-on and instead more diplomatic in conversation style.
So, the conclusion might be the actual opposite that AI will first achieve human level creativity before (if ever) acquiring human functional skills.
I want to say this isn't 100% unexpected (some people show true behaviour openly only once they have nothing to lose). However, this does indicate a very deep flaw in our existing society i.e. giving certain individuals too much power; either via their job position or capital. This is why I think we should have higher tax rates and prevent at least an individual just to gain too much control by their capital. I would even be ok with 50%-100% tax rate above 100 million dollars net worth. There needs to be less imbalance in society, not more.
PS: Also I had divested away from individual Tesla stocks a year or so ago.
I want to say this isn't 100% unexpected (some people show true behaviour openly only once they have nothing to lose). However, this does indicate a very deep flaw in our existing society i.e. giving certain individuals too much power; either via their job position or capital. This is why I think we should have higher tax rates and prevent at least an individual just to gain too much control by their capital. I would even be ok with 50%-100% tax rate above 100 million dollars net worth. There needs to be less imbalance in society, not more.
Edit: Also I had divested away from individual Tesla stocks a year or so ago.