If we see rapid advances in robotics will alignment become a visceral concern for the population at large?
204 karma · joined August 14, 2018
If we see rapid advances in robotics will alignment become a visceral concern for the population at large?
Wsc891 https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=wsc981 has a good resolution for this in the comment directly above: 1) rebase -i onto your own history and squash 2) rebase onto the new branch.
Is Albo like "this is optics for the plebs, just a bit of window dressing bureaucracy on top of the normal market mechanisms where the data centre buying electricity will stimulate supply"
Or is he like "without these rules, data scenters will shoot themselves and the market in the foot and there won't be enough supply"?
Cancer research has a half-decent feedback mechanism that means fads eventually have to prove themselves or die out.
Big if true but is it true?
Also, I looked into omfiles for a project recently, I was very impressed with their speed and blown away by the compression ratios!
But when I watched it in context, it looked like a man putting a hand on his heart and then proffering his thanks to the audience.
My belief is that it was most likely not a nazi salute and is not relevant evidence in the important task of assessing Musk's political stances.
Bonus points if you hit upon the other 2D projection that is useful (I didn't)
But the foundations start with memorisation.
I soon changed my mind; I think those of us who become expert have often have really rich memories of a project where we learnt so much, but we just don't remember episodically all the accumulated learning that happened in boring classrooms to enable the project-induced higher order synthesis.
But the rust code is still safer, e.g. you haven't checked for an `AttributeError` in case `req.cookies`, the point is Rust protects you from this rabbit-hole, if you're prepared to pay the price of wrestling the compiler.
E.g. destroy half the gold in the world, price doubles...