It was always grim, bitter, but "oh so pretty".
5,271 karma · joined July 11, 2013
It was always grim, bitter, but "oh so pretty".
My light switches integrate with Home Assistant, but I can just press the button or turn the knob to dim. Home Assistant Zigbee is there as a bonus, not the sole way of doing things and certainly not a single point of failure.
If they are driving then they are currently potentially spending a couple of hundred pounds a month on fuel for a subcompact car. We are breaching the monthly cost of a car loan to move to electric purely in the cost of petrol.
You can get a used Hyundai Kona EV from Hyundai for under £15k.
https://used.hyundai.co.uk/en/used-car-search/hyundai/kona/k...
Even going off your £18k price, a car loan search shows it would be under £200 per month. Not sure where they pulled £600 from.
But filling up my wife's compact Peugeot 208 (I think?) was £75 over the weekend. Filling up twice is almost the same monthly cost as buying a larger electric SUV.
It definitely seems like it would be worth investigating your options.
I feel like half my job these days is deciding which of the high/critical "security bugs" identified by someone's LLM is worth pushing back on because:
A. It isn't a bug, and just because it found a property with a similar name, perhaps it is an older feature flag and shouldn't be used as a default for customer accounts.
B. If I push back on all of these non-issues, I'll never have any time to get real work done. Of course the logging filters aren't checking and masking SSNs the app doesn't work with SSNs.
And we know they are not spending $30 billion on their SDKs.
Thats a pretty bold position to take.
I find asking a question about whether an application should be doing what it is doing, and getting someone's braindead response of "Claude says it does this..." shows that people aren't learning. I know what it is doing, I can read an IF statement, I don't need someone to spit out 3 paragraphs of unrelated nonsense.
With Claude people aren't learning. They aren't even reading their copy/pasta response to see if it relates to the question.
Are you sure you understand what you are arguing?
I have dependency_tree globally excluded because it is my unique naming convention. Actually it might just be my unique approach because other people don't seem to mind having 1000 overrides for libraries they don't use.
What makes you think that they aren't?
My Xiaomi has no adverts.
But then the Samsung S22 I had before didn't have adverts. Certainly didn't come with McAfee.
So no. The MacOS you use is not Unix.
Lenovo contribute to Linux, and Apple is relatively hostile.
Look at how they break the GPU driver interfaces, and explain to me how that it isn't hostile.
Social media doesn't have to be toxic, just toxic behaviour is rewarded. This is more like "sniper in park causes ban for under 18s". You are keeping the bad things but age gating it. It would be better to remove the sniper in the park.
I have many frustrations with LLMs, mainly around the type of user whos brain shuts down, but Apple would be walking a very fine line if they offer a service that they also will sue you for using.
Perhaps they should have used the Foundation Models to build their code. Really put Apple in a difficult position.
A reason. Not the same as a good reason.
The fact that you even point out that they committed illegal acts that would normally get prosecuted, and yet didn't, shows that IP enforcement is very loose depending on who did it.
Probably being born from public schools, and teachers being the referees, they don't have to take any nonsense from players and can take the ball away from you, lose you ground you have gained, or card you if are abusive to the referee.
Abusive parents on the sidelines can result in sanctions on clubs.
Even if you think the referee made a bad call, it is never acceptable to be abusive to match officials.
It blows my mind the things I see in football they allow people to get away with.
What makes you think they aren't?
The US does as well if they can pretend you made it up with "tips".
The reality is that staff then just work for peanuts.
All three will receive no further updates.
It talks about having a business WhatsApp number so customers can contact you.
I do ask that question.
And no, it's not obvious how a service is bad so if you use a different service then you are just as bad as unrelated people.
And somehow we ended up with more Pixels and not minis.
What has WhatsApp got to do with this? Just because it is Meta?