He defines a tree as "a plant with a stick up the middle."
683 karma · joined October 31, 2013
He defines a tree as "a plant with a stick up the middle."
There were riots in England in 2011. There has been rioting in the US.
Usually this rioting is kicked off by police brutality, but it seems to me that it quickly descends into looting.
I do not think taxation should get singled out as a deciding factor where to setup a business, but could be considered in the round with all the other operational costs.
Low taxes might seem good, but if the key services are non-existent or corrupt, then your costs of operation will be significantly higher than in a place that has high(er) taxes, but civil society is run efficiently.
What you go on to speak of in your second paragraph is the art of rhetoric, and ironically you have unwittingly engaged in the very sort of ad hominem attack which you are complaining that you think that liberal arts scholars would use to defend their position.
An ad hominem attack is a classic logical fallacy and that is something that I suggest you research.
This in part was why the horse meat scandle was such a problem in the UK.
In Canada and in Britain, you simply go to your local GP and get a referral, or go to A&E (Emergancy).
>> but serious issues remain problematic.
No, generally treatment in Canada and Britain for 'serious issues' is very good as well.
We all hear about the well publicised failures of the NHS and Canadian Healthcare, but by and large it works very well. I have seen close relatives and friends have cancer, septicemia, strokes, severe bone breaks, a life changing injury that made a friend a quadrapeligic, and more. For the most post part, the level of healthcare in Canada and Britain has been excellent.
My friend who had septicemia was in a very remote location, and once diagnosed was airlifted to a major hospital.
All of this is covered by public healthcare. It is amazing.
It is even more astounding that the USA still has this Byzantine 'private' system that tries to claim that it is an open market, but it is not.
From a macroeconomic point of view, the USA pays 18% or 19% of GDP for its healthcare system, where as Britain and Canada, and pretty much every other western country pay about 10%. (These are OECD figures) The American healthcare system is horribly inefficient, and puting in a public system ought to be every American's politicial priority.
Imagine that, a universal healthcare system is cheaper to operate than the private system?
The rhetoric and hyperbole that comes out of those who are vested in the status quo is outright criminal.
Maybe I misread it, but to me it sounded like Mozilla did not have Rust support in Thunderbird, but it seems that there is some already ...
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Developer_g...
Or is the Mozilla development and contribution process broken?
It looks like it is realitively straight forward to compile from source: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Developer_g...
Was this number calculated by the same people that calculated that media and software companies loose billions due to piracy?
The figures I quoted above are in 1946 USD.
The figures quoted in the spreadsheet referenced are in "million 1990 International Geary-Khamis dollars" (IGKD)
So the spreadsheet in 1946:
USA: $1,305,357 IGKD Den: $23,690 IGKD
So Denmark's GDP was 1.8148% of the USA's.
Or in reference to the USA's GDP of 1946 being $228M, Denmark's was merely $4.14M.
$100M in 1946 would have been a staggering amount of money, especially in the context and aftermath of WWII. It should also be noted that Denmark was largely untouched by the war, and in 1946 their economy resumed prewar output. This is probably what the leading factor was in turning down the purchase offer, and I generally agree that it was the right decision.
[1] http://www.ggdc.net/maddison/historical_statistics/horizonta...
American GDP in 1946 was $228M [1] (in 1940 it was $100M). The USA essentially offered half of their GDP for Greenland.
American GDP in 2016 was $18,625M.
So in relative terms, the Americans offered roughly $9Trillion.
Have you even read Manufacturing Consent by Noam Chomsky?
What do you even mean by conservative? Liberal?
You do realise that liberal and liberalism means keeping the government out of people's lives. The USA is a liberal nation by definition, for example 'The separation of church and state' and your 'right to bare arms, in a well regulated malitia'
We have stop perpetuating this narrative that the media is in anyway 'left' leaning because it is not. When was the last time you read an opinion piece that called for the nationalisation of some private industry?
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/aug/30/apple-pay-b...
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/aug/30/apple-pay-b...
Your likeness is your data.
I don't think so. The media (the 4th estate) is now basically a mouth piece for the corporations. Noam Chompsky has written extensively on this, and the west really does not have a diverse spectrum of opinion, information, and perspective in popular, widely distributed and readily available information sources.
Media and information sources have been consolidated into a few centralised corporate ownerships that are not interested in social justice and a fair distribution of wealth. Quite the contrary, the corporate interests are simply interested in generating shareholder profits and wealth. Indeed, the directors of media companies are duty bound to generate as much profit for their respective corporations. This naturally means that the media corporations are interested in consolidating and centralising as much wealth for themselves as possible, and will cater their information and direction of opinion to achieve that end.
I think if the USPO was capturing this data, then it should be available to everyone.
In the end, this seems to me like pulling up the ladder after himself, and ultimately quite selfish.