I'm Scots, not British. Roughly 50% of us support independence from the UK.
683 karma · joined October 31, 2013
I'm Scots, not British. Roughly 50% of us support independence from the UK.
Everything is tech now. And other things are the value add.
For example, if you are a law firm, or a real estate company, and if your tech is not operating then your company is not operating.
If your Internet is offline, or your local network, then your business is not running.
If your company has a security breach, then you will have massive reputation problems.
If you're a small business, you need to have an online presence with Insta, Facebook, and Google maps.
It's all 75% tech now. Get with the programme.
The conservative obstructionist and scorched earth tactics are obscene.
Nice attempt at shifting the goalposts and shifting blame. And making a false equivalence with nuclear power.
Abolishionists want capital punishment abolished because capital punishment is inhumane, cruel, and morally objectionable.
Clearly Stripe was in breach in this circumstance, and courts look dimly on that kind of behaviour.
I'm guessing in a decade we'll have a viable early stage industrial process, and in 2 decades we have commissioned fusion reactors.
If we don't kill the planet with nuclear war or the climate crisis.
In the UK is 1 KWh is £0.34
So, this costs £28 in electricity to run this experiment. The experiment is a momentary thing.
Clearly there is now some work to, but now this is becoming an engineering problem of how to extend, sustain, and scale this process.
Instead, they are interested in delivering buttons, fields, and streamlined workflows. Technical debt and library upgrades? Os upgrades? Forget about it. They need to deliver value back to the business in terms of faster business processes.
Only when the business is hacked or they fail compliance does the business leadership start to care.
Blaming the people with the hands on the tools is not fair when the business will not give the resources to do their work properly.
It is the biggest tech retrograde since MS started putting UUIDs in to their Urls. Which they largely stopped except for sharepoint documents.
Because some, perhaps many, have abused the originally good idea, does not invalidate its positive aspects.
Also, I do not agree it is a file system. It is a key-value storage system that is leagues better than the win.ini, system.ini, and the prolific ini file collection hell it replaced.
Some form of version control would make the registry better.
Also, auto play of video and sometimes audio also makes it a horrible experience.
There is so much about Facebook that keeps pushing me away.
Knife crime in the UK is a red herring.
That is just not true. BT consumer FTTC is contended up to 40 to 1--that is you are sharing your backhaul with upto 40 of your neighbours. I am assuming that their FTTH services are the same.
Sorry, I don't buy in the fetishisation of that and being instantly available.
If someone needs to get in touch with me, then they will.
Yip, things in London are quite different than the rest of the UK.
While Openreach has to allow access to other providers to its infrastructure, most infrastructure is owned and controlled by BT.
If you want FTTP, the underlying service is still BT Openreach. Openreach is very profitable.
At my previous employer it cost us £30K to have BT put in 3000m of fibre that took them 1 afternoon, then it cost £1K a month for a 30Mbs service.
BT owns provides the vast majority of broadband service in the UK and it is somewhat disingenuous to claim BT is on an equal footing as Hyperoptic, VM, or Community Fibre.
TT and Sky use BT OR infra, and EE, Plusnet, and BT Retail are all owned by the BT Group.
The telecom market in the UK is very consolidated and controlled by BT.
Canadians see the Canadian Royal Family as nothing more than a figurehead of the state.
I am a Canadian and I have studied British and North American History extensively.
Resource administration is a constitutional power that provinces administrator.
The area in white in the below map are not Canada Lands which makes them Provincial Lands, ie Provincial Crown Lands.
https://clss.nrcan-rncan.gc.ca/data-donnees/sgb-maps-dag-car...
No, Crown Land is controlled by the provinces. No, the Canadian monarchy does not own crown land. The Crown owns crown land. Essentially The Crown in Canada is its own legal entity and instrument for the purposes of administration of public lands. The Crown Estates of England and Scotland are something different again, and the Crown Estate owns things like tidal lands and actual real property.
There is Federal Crown Land, but that is almost completely in the northern territories. This is down to Canada's constitutional makeup because provinces control resources.
The Federal government can expropriate land from the provinces when it has a reason to do so like for military bases.
Here is a link that shows Canada Lands. The white area are Provincial Lands.
https://clss.nrcan-rncan.gc.ca/data-donnees/sgb-maps-dag-car...
HBC lands were surrendered to the British government in 1868 ahead of confederation.
Crown Land is land owned and administered by the provinces. Crown Land can be licenced for many uses and sometimes it can be purchased.
Also, Provincial Parks are not Crown Land.
There is no such thing as a "British Crown Corporation."
Crown Corporations are a Canadian thing.
I lived in Canada for 30 years and now live in the Scotland. CalMac and Scottish Water are not "Crown Corporations," but are nevertheless owned and controlled by the Scottish Ministers. This is contrast to BC Ferries, ICBC, and BC Hydro which are Crown Corporations.
In the UK there is something called the Crown Estate, which is somethint again different.
BT/Openreach has control of about 80% of the backhaul/trunk connectivity.
1) Mute phone
2) Turn off desktop notifications
4) enjoy working in peace
5) check notifications when you like
7) Live a happier and less stressful life.
I'm guessing you were not present in 1991 when Ukraine declared itself independent. I am guessing you are oblivious to the very significant Russian casualty figures that are putting this as high as 50,000: 10,000 dead and 40,000 injured.
Ukraine will not cede any land, and is getting significant war material and support from the west.
Putin, quite clearly, is a modern Kaiser Wilhelm II. And I have every suspicion that he was egged on Xi because for China there is no downside. China will basically take control of Eastern Russia over the next 50 years and Russia will be China's vassle state in Europe.
Think of it this way. Russia is like IBM, and their war is like OS/2. China gave Putin tacit permission and support, but China actually has its own objectives which are served by the success or failure. And probably failure even more so.
Or will IPv8 go straight to 1024 bits?
;)