683 karma · joined October 31, 2013
Thankfully we are moving to Azure Cloud Search services, which just work, over the next year.
Good bye manure pile, hello compost.
The second, symbol s, is the SI unit of time. It is defined by taking the fixed numerical value of the caesium frequency {\displaystyle \Delta \nu _{\text{Cs}}} {\displaystyle \Delta \nu _{\text{Cs}}}, the unperturbed ground-state hyperfine transition frequency of the caesium-133 atom, to be 9192631770 when expressed in the unit Hz, which is equal to s−1.
His argument is based upon that forest biomass is shrinking and therefore forest are causing CO2 emissions:
"When you add up both the absorption and emission, Canada's forests haven't been a net carbon sink since 2001. Due largely to forest fires and insect infestations, the trees have actually added to our country's greenhouse gas emissions for each of the past 15 years on record."
Forest only reduce CO2 when they photosynthesising, so if the forests are being killed by fire or insects, then the forests are not ingesting CO2 but are expelling.
They way this article is titled leads one to believe that forests are causing the problem and that it is implicitly okay to be reducing forest biomass. I think the title is misleading and disingenuous.
The the passenger service are sold off as franchises, which are are bid for by various companies.
The NHS chose not to upgrade to from Windows XP and 2003 and look where that got them last year: a massive crypto locker infection.
https://github.com/GNOME/gnome-shell/blob/1f03599d1cf888f73a...
Seems to me that "#include <gtk/gtk.h>" means that gnome-shell does use gtk. Or maybe I am missing some nuance of your statement.
Gmail by contrast is only a hosted/cloud solution, and comes with a security solution as part of the service.
I can compare Symantec Security Cloud sitting in front of an Exchange solution to a Gmail solution, and say that hands down Gmail is far and away better with exactly zero phishing emails making it through compared to numerous attacks able to get through Symantec Security Cloud to our Exchange users.
Comparing Exchange to Gmail is like comparing kwiwis to radishes, in my view.
Who said it is necessary for 'progressives' hate regulation? Progressiveness, I think, is a contextual thing. Capitalism, free-marketism, socialism, theocracism, and indeed any political and social movement can all advocate progressivism toward their own ideologies.
So, in my view, progressivism has more to with general change to an idealogical view, whatever that idealogical view is, and not got anything to do with change to a certain idealogical view. As in one person may view a change being progressive, eg reduction in regulation, and another might view that change as being regressive, eg removal of regulation of toxic chemicals into a river system.
Would I want/trust merchants to have this information? No.
I would like to point out that the article in the main was about China, where they are building out significant coal capacity. However it does seem that on balance it does seem the right thing to travel to trade bus diesel engines for static coal generation.
Then what about the batteries? The batteries need to be produced, and they have a useful lifespan, then need to be disposed of or recycled. How do we deal with all of that contamination?
Are we further ahead with electric cars and buses?
I went to the Volvo museum last year and learned that pneumatic tires consume something like 30% of the energy expended by road vehicles, should we not be focusing on better rail transport? Or solid tire technology?
The old adage of "you kind of get what you pay for" seems to apply.
What's new/different here over this and other efforts?