251 karma · joined November 6, 2015
I'm not sure asking the compiler to babysit you every turn of the road is a good idea.
I erased the lezard but the tail and it grew back very weirdly. How robust is this method?
Clickbait entertainment is probably over represented but that's also a kind of video who receives a lot of view at the same time which what "Trending" means.
Source: used to work next to the Trend team.
This was true 200 years ago not anymore. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Money_creation#Credit_theory...
Only 3% need to be matched IIRC
I wonder how much of the name change was to acknowledge the fact that a lot of Google smartness is actually not ML (eg Google search is mostly string matching and giant lookup tables) or at least not Deep Learning.
At the start of my career in ML, I was shivering when someone was labelling my work as AI. At first because I found it too old school, then because I found it over-hyped. But I now use this world myself because that's what people read in the newspaper.
Also, it's often hard to guess that eg the Google assistant is mostly based on regexes and small grammars, while the photo classification is actual ML.
What I'm very cautious though, is to only AI as field name. I don't speak of Google assistant as "an AI" but as an "AI powered" software.
(Ex-Googler)
You can do that in HTML email too. Newsletter have an "unsubscribe" button, calendar invites have a yes/no/maybe button.
I agree it's inevitable that someone ill intentioned use ML + drone to create deadly weapons, I don't understand why USA is doing it, nor what are they trying to accomplish like that.
Drone strick is already a main argument in terrorist propaganda, I don't see how increasing the number of attacks and decreasing human intervention is going to help that.
Could we assume that we all understand the downside of regulations ? but that we still suggest some when the market fall into a bad optimum (bad for the consumer). If you don't agree that the market is stuck in a bad place, fine you can argue that.
So they are not cutting corners. I'll be more concerned about the companies playing catch up, or the cheap clone that will try to cut on the costly sensor like Lidar and on the long and rigorous process required to develop it correctly. .
When I resort to !g Google usually returns nothing interesting either and the most promising links are usually marked as visited, since I already clicked them from DDG.
Should you let your app be closed source and share the code only on formal request? So you have a paper trail?
Otherwise I like the idea.
Unless if the new format G2 is a super set of the old format G1. Read protobuffers best practice to know more about this.