Will look into this
251 karma · joined November 6, 2015
Will look into this
* economy is auto-ramping. You only chose the number of collector. I think this could use some balancing and more experimentations. But it changes the dynamic of the game over time from money being the limiting factor to pop cap. Even if the two players play very aggressively.
* Also the game is not about destroying opponent base (you cam still win this way) but about controlling some map zones. Controlling the "pads" charges a nuke missile, but the missile can flip hand 1 second before firing. This builds up a lot of intensity and makes timing very important in the gameplay. Knowing when you should stale the charging or fasten it, and how much you should pay for this is hard to master.
> According to the Carbon Fund you can offset your CO2 emissions for $10 per metric ton. US citizen produce an average of 16 ton per year. So you can solve global warming by just 160$ per year per head, it's really not a big deal.
For me this 10$ per CO2 ton is extremely misleading. It maybe correct for now, but as soon as more people try to offset their CO2, the price will skyrock, because there isn't many 10$ per ton opportunity for CO2 offsetting.
And Anu is apparently even sounder and faster?
https://pijul.org/manual/why_pijul.html#pijul-for-darcs-user...
https://discourse.pijul.org/t/is-this-project-still-active-y...
I took 3 months off for my first and 4 months for the second. My wife was pretty miserable through the first month. Breastfeeding is exhausting, as well as being woke up at various time of the night. I'm glad I was home so I could take care of the rest.
I agree that afterwards things got easier, and we were able to enjoy some vacations.
But still there is a huge difference between spending a few hours at the beach with the baby and going back to work whole day.
The nice thing with Python is that I implemented a parser from a function signature, and it also works for NamedTuple.
The advantage wrt to other python parser is that it uses the type annotations, instead of guessing
Doesn't it depend on the piece you use? Knights and Bishops seems to be able to move on the board and move back in time at the same time.
This is new from 2018 IIRC. Before emails from free accounts where scanned for ads tailoring. They had problem selling GSuite, because clients where confused between the privacy of free and paid tiers. So they estimated it would be more beneficial to stop using mail data for all account, and simplify GSuite sells.
The revolt started internally despite a lot of effort to conceal the project, even from engineers working on it. And Google management started to stepback only after the press got involved.
When I joined Google I was very influenced by the 'Google is the good guy PR'. I never liked the Ads business model, but there a few Google products I really liked (Inbox, Maps and YT notably).
It's hard to pinpoint the wake up call, but I'd say it was project Maven (aka let's make an AI to help US drones kill more people), and all the lying and mislabeling there was around it (our AI don't kill people, etc…).
Wrt Cambridge Analytica, you have to go back to the mind state of 2016. At the time FB was mostly attacked because it was a walled garden hoarding all the precious data. So FB allowed users to share data with external apps. Then one apps managae to get data about 100k Americans and their friends and use it for helping Trump. And then 'data portability' was evil.
I'd love to get into the Jai community but really don't know where to start, beyond watching the videos.
Do you have some benchmark for performances ? Is this more aimed at playing around in a notebook or used inside a full data processing pipeline?
In a way working at Google is like that. If your project doesn't have "impact" your manager isn't promoted and nobody in the team is.
And engineers are generally free to change team.
It does have some inconvenients and it doesn't remove politics.