288 karma · joined June 2, 2012
Currently based in Albany, Oregon.
Email: stephen.j.rosenthal@gmail.com (personal)
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/srosenthal; my proof: https://keybase.io/srosenthal/sigs/7Bvi6tfYrSQuN38zQUsZFEM4tg7Em7IoRgm_ZegPz6M ]
Masters is usually about 2 years, though it could be longer in some cases or if worked on part-time. PhD is often 4-6+.
What 3-4 year degree did you mean? Bachelors?
The details may depend on the employer + brokerage.
I was an ex-employee already and had exercised my options within the 90 day window of resigning. If I remember correctly, we used Carta for both exercising the options and the tender offer.
For the tender offer, the company set a deadline and a price per share. Current employees were limited to selling a certain % of their options/shares. The website enforced the same restriction for me, which seemed like a bug, but I didn’t plan on selling most of my shares anyway. I chose a number of shares in a web form, clicked a button, and got cash direct-deposited. I had a larger than usual tax bill but I paid it while handling my usual annual tax return. No penalty on the taxes due to the “safe harbor” rule.
I’ve never heard of that system. Is there somewhere we can read about it, or maybe you can explain a bit more?
Is the offer of the form “we accept you, so long as your grades satisfy the following requirements…”?
Is the interview performance pass/fail or if you do poorly do they give you a less agreeable offer? (higher grades required?)
I usually defend Amazon (used to work there and enjoyed it) but the last interview cycle was really unimpressive.
Similarly, when a highly qualified applicant gets an offer way below the upper bound they’ll be upset and ask “why don’t I get paid near the top of your band?”
Unless all employers work together to make the bands useless, it’ll at least give some visibility into what employers are worth targeting as an applicant.
My employer has Colorado jobs and gives some wide ranges (ex: 130-300k) and more narrow ranges (ex: 200-240k). The wide ones probably cover 3-4 levels and the narrow ones are for a specific level. They’re all missing RSUs or bonuses, but they should give you a rough idea if it’s worth applying or starting a discussion with a recruiter/hiring manager.
Maybe it’s different types of work (consulting?) or companies (earlier stage startups?).
I don’t think I’m particularly good or bad at networking but fully expect to have to do coding interviews and/or take homes. Or maybe I really do need to get a stronger network!
According to https://yaml.org/spec/1.2.2/, YAML 1.2 (from 2009) is a strict superset of JSON. Earlier versions were an _almost_ superset. Hence the confusion in this thread. It depends on the version…
But, I did work for Amazon several years before and that was mostly a good experience. So, luck of the draw, depending on which manager/team you get assigned to.
When your customers are using your product as part of their job, your incentive is (often) clear: make them more efficient at their job, which means make your product faster and easier to use. The vendor and the customer are aligned.
In the b2c world your goal is often “engagement”. Get the customer to spend as much time as possible in the app. Get them to use your app more than other apps. In a way you have to make your app less useful (to the customer) to make it more valuable to the vendor.
Just an anecdote that gasoline is not always available during crises. We did have electricity at home but neighboring buildings and neighborhoods had outages for a week or more.
Has anyone here had a company try to enforce their non compete, and can share their insights?
Do you best, be aware of your worth, and if/when you find a better opportunity, grab it!
It’s not good to beat yourself up for “failing” to get into Google or some more desirable company. Anyone who is familiar with the process knows that these companies (including Amazon!) frequently reject qualified candidates. They’re tuned to avoid bad hires at all costs. Basically if any interviewer has a bad feeling about a candidate, they’ll get rejected.
On the other hand they seem to be doing well as a business so recruiting evidently hasn’t been a big problem for them.