GoPro Ride Through an Electron Beam Irradiator at Full Beam Power [video]
youtube.com
youtube.com
Pleasing taste, some monsterism.
The process includes parts being moved around on some of the shortest conveyer belts I've ever seen, in some cases moving just a few feet before being picked up by another person.
a) It's a short term buffer. While the lines are going to balanced pretty well, it's still super useful to have a small buffer.
b) Lets you spread out the lines a bit, giving you more flexibility with the design and layout of your lines. This is probably one reason why they don't try to pack the lines closer so that you can just hand off.
c) Having people shuffling the parts around is just inefficient. You don't want to hire a person just to shuffle the parts over such a small distance. You don't want to interrupt the last guy on the line's job with such a task. You could try to minimize the cost of runners by batching up your work before moving them (and having your runner rotate through different things to haul), but now you introducing probably more buffer than you want, and also potential latency spikes into your process.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tybKnGZRwcU
An electron beam seems to be the stealthiest of the three extermination options, the other two being a star laser and antimatter "rods from God."
Or they could just false flag a nuke strike and watch us sterilize ourselves.
It would be obvious if a strike came from an extraterrestrial source, there would be no terrestrial launch detection.
In addition, such a attack is unlikely to succeed. It would take a long time to arrive on earth and by the time the result of the attack was known there could be angry Earthlings counterattacking.
You don't need all that fuel to get it into space, it's already there. You just drop the warhead.
'The thing about aliens is they're alien.' - why assume this only works in one direction?
Given the assumptions of faith under which we here labor, it may also be wise to heed 1 Cor. 2:11, in which the convert Roman makes one of his few worthy statements in warning men against imagining they can know the mind of God. In that light, the proposition lacks soundness even under its own axioms.
You're kidding right? It's all SciFi. In case you're confused, the Fi is short for Fiction. Stuff that's not real. So of course we're making assumptions on the entire thing. Including The Book as the greatest selling book of fiction of all time.
You're also now assuming that we Earthlings are the original source. Some scifi tropes state we're more Martian fleeing their dying planet or with things like panspermia. I like the SciFi where everyone is searching for the nearly mythical planet that turns out to be Earth. Ice Pirates is a goofy one.
That aside, of course we're making assumptions. But if we don't choose to either be bound by the assumptions we've already made or re-evaluate them, then we're playing with dolls rather than worldbuilding. Your pastimes are of course your own business, but it's been a long time indeed since I graduated from the former to the latter.
(Not that I mind space opera, when it focuses on the character-driven stories it's best suited to tell - trying to figure out how a TARDIS works misses the point entirely, while "The Doctor's Wife" is beautiful. But you mentioned science fiction, and my current standard there is set by Children of Time and Blindsight.)
Or, more likely, the alien "creators" have created them more or less in our image.
There's good reasons to think that alien species might not look all that different from animals on this planet, simply due to physics. Animals here didn't simply spring to life in their current form; they evolved from single-celled organisms to best suit their environments.
That makes it harder for someone who sees them to convince others that it was aliens and not just a trick of bad lighting or someone with deformities or injuries that give them an unusual appearance.
It also makes it less likely for them to be mistaken for some other species on the planet. Suppose the Federation sent an expedition to ancient Earth that included crew from a species that looked a lot like our cats, and accidentally let Earth people get too good a look at them and their technology.
Those Earth people might think those are Earth cats, and conclude that Earth cats are a lot more powerful and advanced then they thought, and that they had better stop treating cats like animals lest the cats decided to wipe them out and start treating them as superior beings. Next thing you know that entire civilization is treating cats as magical being of great value or even worshiping them as gods.
Then again, since the master code was 000000, it wouldn't really be to difficult to break without a backdoor
There's at least one science fiction writer who had similar thoughts and wrote a story [1] where the FTL is pretty much the only technology in which the FTL aliens who visit Earth are ahead of us.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Road_Not_Taken_(short_stor...
Of course it is not a guarantee. It is possible that the alien invasion fleet arrives, they land, unload their main battle tanks and a passing puppy laps up their whole fleet accidentally.
What we know that by virtue of them being here they are either very good at faster than light travel, or they are good at traveling slow.
If they are good at FTL what else are they good at? We currently think that is impossible. What other things we think as impossible are practiced by them?
If they traveled slow, they must be also good at maintaining their equipment on crazy long timeframes. It also shows that they are the patient sorts who plan and execute things on the order of timelines our empires crumble. How long have they been with us then? How much preparation did they do beforehand? Did Pham Nuwen code the intel management engine?
But sure, it is possible that the Aliens arrive. They broadcast a TV signal threatening us, but unfortunately the sync is a bit off so basicaly no-one understands it. Then they enter our atmosphere. The high oxygen concentration rusts their equipment and they all die.
The same goes for the sublight option, only a lot more so. Unless they have FTL communications, which I believe we also consider effectively impossible, by the time they get here anything they think they know about us will be wildly outdated, in technological terms at the very least. Possibly also in terms of the dominant terrestrial species, but we can be generous here.
We can be generous about their information latency because that only matters if they want it to. Any species which wants us dead and doesn't care what state the planet's left in - a reasonable assumption, if we're talking about them popping our nukes at us - doesn't need to come close to landing, or even to orbit, to do it; a kinetic bombardment in passing will amply suffice to depopulate Earth to more or less any degree desired. For subluminal interstellar travel to be even remotely feasible, even for an individually long-lived species, implies access to the kind of delta-V budget where the only limiting factor in such a bombardment is the time it takes to accelerate impactors, which may be zero if those are released before or during deceleration to match velocity with our solar system.
In the former or FTL case, we don't know how FTL works or even could, and we therefore can assume anything we like - with all assumptions at equal risk of bankruptcy. In the latter or high-sublight case, they don't need to be more clever to kill us if that's all they're after, and it may be unreasonably charitable to assume we would even get a chance to see it coming.
There would be no launch detected, that is true. That doesn’t mean that it would be obvious that the attack was extraterestrial. The alternative hypothesis would be the that the known terrestrial enemies developed some technique to confuse your sensors, or cloak themselves, or bribe your watchdogs, or pre-position warheads in space, or any other similar deception. People would be sooner thinking that their enemies smuggled nukes in overland than to think that aliens attacked them.
Less advanced nations such as North Korea and Pakistan have nukes. Do you think that their monitoring systems are really that good?
My concern is that it would possibly snowball and draw in other actors.
1) A surprise meteor hits Pyongyang or Islamabad.
2) Their military hits their preprogrammed nuclear targets.
3) This draws larger powers into a nuclear exchange.
4) Fin.
But really, I think a bioweapon made by some kid in >2070 is probably more likely.
I can see Pakistan and India exchanging nukes, but why would anyone join in that?
There is a contingent of generals in every nuclear capable country which is itching to use them. Historically, it has only been a rational civilian leader who has kept them in check.
There was recently a US President who was talking about nuking a hurricane.[0] Once nuclear weapons are in play, we just need one irrational reactionary leader, in the wrong place, at the wrong time, and Fin.
[0] https://www.washingtonpost.com/weather/2020/06/08/new-bill-w...
On this theme: we know several types of natural, astrophysical accelerators of charged particles—but none of those are observed as a localizable source of charged particles, from the perspective of astronomy. We just see secondary photons.
That’s the point of the relativistic part of a relativistic electron beam. Time dilation doesn’t give the beam internal time to self interact.
"...the Therac-20, which could produce X-rays or electrons of up to 20 MeV.
"This dual accelerator concept was applied to the Therac-20 and Therac-25, with the latter being much more compact, versatile, and easy to use. It was also more economical for a hospital to have a dual machine that could apply treatments of electrons and X-rays, instead of two machines. "
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Therac-25
This has been posted many times.
There's some well-documented cases of people getting Real Fucked Up from irradiation systems that weren't maintained. Plainly difficult has two good examples of these that were badly maintained and put people into the ground in lead-lined coffins: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8V4q59o_mjU and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vDGN_Q_0jWI
Apparently some phosphorescent materials or just electron-induced heating on the cart in front.
White speckles are electrons !
In vacuum they are limited by the speed of light.
For example: https://www.mpi-hd.mpg.de/hfm/CosmicRay/ChLight/Cherenkov.ht....
Also, hello! my name is Ryan & we are likely in the same field.
Fyi, if you start seeing those little single-pixel stars in your VR headset, you have probably wandered out of the play area.
To get to the required levels, irradiation isn't necessary... but it's cheap and easy. I get the sense that it's often used because of poor growing practises, more than anything else.
I can't speak for other countries, but in the UK most cannabis has until recently been gamma irradiated - which often led to practically terpless flower that smelt of damp hay. More recently, e-beam (electron-beam) irradiation has largely taken over - and it seems to be much, much kinder on terpenes! Honestly, most is now impossible to tell apart from non-irradiated flower.
I don't have actual data, I'm afraid. There's a single paper talking about cannabinoid and terpene content of cannabis after gamma irradiation, which was paid for by Bedrocan - but I haven't found anything about how it compares to e-beam.
I met this guy there: https://www.capturedlightning.com/
> GoPro is enclosed in a 3/8" thick lead pig with a 1/2" thick, 50% lead glass window. Additionally there is a 1/4" thick lead plate above the camera box to provide shielding from direct irradiation from the beam.