370 karma · joined November 13, 2021
It is no longer realistic to pretend that only ASCII exists and try to get away with that.
Ah, no, programming language runtimes are Ok, no need to include them. But then if you write a book about React, or MySQL, or... well, you get the point.
I have to say I personally like it :-)
4. Explain what problem is being solved. Why does this exist at all? What is the value proposition?
A comparison table helps of course but I wouldn’t even look at that unless I can “buy” the value proposition first.
I have used this many times without a problem.
But it also had an insanely huge amount of bugs, half-broken features and “I’ll just do it my way” stuff. This was also true already at launch.
Sure, if Microsoft had replaced it in 2003 or 2004, nobody would have such “fond” memories of it even today. But the bad reputation does not come only from the fact that it was not updated for a long time; it also comes from its many problems and issues.
Keep in mind that both Firefox and Thunderbird started life as an evolution of the original “Mozilla Suite” which itself was an evolution of Netscape Communicator, which included a browser and an email client. So originally both were part of the core mission of Mozilla.
Thunderbird failed to gain much traction though and it was later spun off — it is now developed by a separate company (a Mozilla subsidiary).
> but a phone OS?
Yes, this does not make much sense to me either.
Ouch. That hurts.
Looks like this also switches to a monospaced font, which makes it easier to draw ASCII art.
This should be rendered using a monospaced font.
_____
\ /
\ /
OMy comment was not disrespectful, you may have not liked it but that’s a very different thing. I didn’t call anyone an ass; you did. You are the one who cannot maintain a conversation without calling names.
> This isn’t the place for you
Unfortunately you don’t get to decide that.
Because you are the one who is complaining.
If something is “free” that means that you can get it legally without paying.
If something is only “free” by circumventing law, then that’s theft.
1. (If they have the know how and resources to clone your app) estimate how much would it cost for them to just implement a similar app themselves, instead of purchasing from you. Price at a similar level (that should still be worth it for them as they avoid the risk). “Similar level” could even be let’s say 2x, but probably not 10x. In other words make sure “buy” sounds better than “make”.
2. Estimate the profit they will generate, price somewhere below that level. In other words, make sure they see they will get economic value out of the deal.
[1]: https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/11/tools/jlink.html
So everyone is seeing a different price apparently.
Not sure if this is a social experiment or a joke. Or both.