159 karma · joined February 3, 2013
With all the crazy laws surrounding taxis and liveries, I wouldn't be surprised if an app like that is illegal in some municipalities.
"We're building a new blogging platform that can use Ghost themes, check it out" comes across a lot more positive than "We're porting Ghost to PHP, please give us money to do this."
I think you mean that it is okay to quit if the rules change by someone else's accord...
Hasn't California's exchange had big problems too?
EULA definitely doesn't allow Hackintoshes. Some workplaces are ok with this, some definitely are not.
Don't get me wrong because I love 2Pac, but 2Pac's lyrics and his actions didn't always match up.
In the parent's case, if they lived in Providence or Worcester or Portland, which are definitely Patriots markets, it wouldn't be on OTA :s
Also, with "at best half of the work being used" I was referring to the fact that it is just lyrics and doesn't include the other elements of the song.
Also, the entire work includes the beat. I'm guessing Kanye would argue the beat to "2 Words" was pretty important too.
Each of the annotated Rap Genius lyrics are used to explain and understand where the original artist is coming from and the point of the site isn't just to let people know the lyrics (which is at best half of the work being used, if you were concerned with the 3rd of the criteria on fair use) but to provide original content that explains everything. I don't think they would have a problem winning, but the will and money to win might be a problem :s
I'm not aware of any more recent case law that might supersede this as it has been a few years since I've been in an IP Law class. Anyone know more?