grappler

Since we now face a threat of large-scale de-anonymization, a reasonable countermeasure might be using AI to make one's writing style less personally identifying, in order to try and retain some pseudonymity.

    https://simonlermen.substack.com/p/large-scale-online-deanonymization
    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47139716

I think the point is that if the same shooters had only more 'normal' guns available to them, they would not have been able to cause nearly as much death and injury before being stopped.

I'm really thinking mostly about the hardware part here, and maybe just enough layers of the stack to feel like an integrated hardware setup. Let the nerds play with whatever software they want above that.

To go ahead and dream a bit:

I'd hope for an online configurator like the one SoftIron's HyperCloud has [1] but instead of "talk to a sales rep", show a price for what you just configured, like you're configuring a macbook.

Relatedly, there should be a standard rack form factor in the size category of NUCs and Mac Minis, rather than having to go all the way to the 19 inch monster racks that medium to large businesses use. If it were nailed down to the point of being able to blind mate (just learned that term from Oxide's article here!) gear into it, that would be kind of perfect.

  1. https://softiron.com/hypercloud/configure/

This all has me wondering, if I just want to play with stuff in this space as an individual homelabber who earns a tech salary and wants a nicely designed rack-mounted alternative to a mess of unorganized NUCs and cables and whatnot, what are my best options?

thanks, that's a good answer, and more nuanced than I'd realized things had gotten in this space

I recall hearing that Google and Bing have a nearly insurmountable lead in terms of raw ability to index the web, and that all other "alternative" search engines are using Google and/or Bing under the hood. Is this the case for Kagi? Or is Kagi actually maintaining and drawing upon their own independent index?

1.27 hasn't been released yet.

Looking back at the previous release, 1.26, for comparison, we have this post, published a few weeks before 1.26 was released:

    https://kubernetes.io/blog/2022/11/18/upcoming-changes-in-kubernetes-1-26/

The release announcement, made on the day of the 1.26 release, highlighted the new stuff:

    https://kubernetes.io/blog/2022/12/09/kubernetes-v1-26-release/

According to this article, 80 is the upper end of bids they're reporting; the lower end is 60 cents on the dollar.

wondering if you're talking about a twitter event pre-Elon (so people on the right were mad at the twitter exec) or post-Elon (so people on the left were mad at the twitter exec).

Guessing the former, since that would put the juxtaposition you're highlighting in left vs right terms...

I've set up feeds that watch many of the popular instances, using score thresholds (a weighted sum of boosts, likes and replies), so that the feeds just get posts that break a previous threshold I had set (the point being to just see some of the breakout popular trending posts and links, sort of rolling my own algorithm). Every time a post appears in these feeds, I up the threshold again, to a bit under the score of that new post.

In a downward trend, I might reasonably expect that this set of feeds I've set up would go quiet, as new posts fail to hit the high water mark I had set at the peak. Instead, my experience over the past couple months has been the opposite. Breakout posts are getting scores that have kept me pushing my thresholds higher and higher. I don't know what this says about overall usage and engagement, but I think it at least suggests that in certain ways related to popular posts, it's continuing to go up and to the right.

So the area of disagreement is that his view is rosy...?

Twitter should 'steal' support for ActivityPub.

That is, join the fediverse. Stop being a walled garden. That seems passé now that we have millions of people able to follow, @-mention and reply from one domain to another.

Twitter's business model is already completely chucked and will need a ground-up rethink, so we might as well build from this more modern starting point.

"oh yeah, I have plenty else going on. I'm the head of other innovative companies. I don't need this crap over at twitter."

At this point, twitter's goal (whether headed by Elon or someone else) should be to join the fediverse, and be accepted by other large instances for federation with them.

I mean ok, yes it's part of the web and there are legit reasons to link to content there but, you know, make the effort to not do that without a really good reason.

Not even a bit

Using twitter, linking to twitter, giving a twitter as your contact handle... these things are now markers of the Wrong Kind of People.

I wouldn't want to be one of those people, and I hope you wouldn't either.

There is now no good use for twitter other than steering people off of twitter.

The fediverse is where microblogging should happen now. We should collectively turn our backs on twitter. Twitter needs to collapse into nothing.

The replacement for twitter is the fediverse. It has already been growing by leaps and bounds since Elon's takeover.

  https://the-federation.info/

People will say "mastodon" a lot and they're not wrong, but the relationship is that mastodon has proven itself the breakout killer app of the fediverse. Click around a bit and you'll find other types of instances like Pleroma, PeerTube, etc.

Basically it's a set of open standards (in particular ActivityPub) developed to do a decentralized version of what twitter and similar social apps do. And no lock-in to a commercial platform or app or protocol.

Techdirt post responding to the platformer article

  https://www.techdirt.com/2022/12/14/twitters-big-ad-plan-violate-both-ftc-consent-decree-california-privacy-law-to-force-users-to-hand-over-info-for-ad-targeting/

I think it just took some parts of the media a few days to sort through the noise and pick up what the most important developments actually were, and perhaps get the necessary confirmations on the meaningful developments (and lack of confirmation on the wrong ones).

It takes any profession time to correct mistakes and get the story right, but the media have the unenviable task of trying to do that very very quickly.

he may have been left leaning before but that label seems debatable at best for the last couple years

  https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2021/10/what-happened-to-matt-taibbi.html

It may not be as good a link as the one from FTC itself, but I wouldn't call a leading national newspaper "blogspam".

Here for example is a capture of techmeme, which routinely gives media reports more emphasis than a primary source.

  https://www.techmeme.com/221208/h1530

The L5 heading at the very top of that page is this link we're talking about on this thread.

This preference makes more sense I think in cases where the primary source is a company touting its own product, where a media report would be more objective. Then again, maybe you could view this instance as the FTC touting its own product too :)

If you're a liberal who likes the idea of an electric car, and knew Musk as the Tesla guy, bringing to market sexy electric cars people actually want, and then you see him waging a culture war siding with Trump et al and going well out of his way ($billions out of his way) to dunk on liberals...

You're right, it's not going to change you from liberal to conservative. But it absolutely could change how how you feel about Elon Musk and your interest in buying a Tesla.

I'm not sure how many coal-rolling giant-pickup-driving climate-denying MAGA types would be interested in Teslas just because Elon has started pandering to them.

The takeaway for me is that anyone who doesn't like large centralized social networks having and using this kind of influence over the dissemination of information, whether because you didn't like twitter's earlier management or because you don't like its new management by Elon, or some other reason, should be cheering the recent growth in the fediverse of decentralized social networking sites.

https://the-federation.info/

I'm loving seeing the shift from embedding and linking to tweets and twitter accounts to embedding and linking to fediverse posts and profiles.

Musk used to be one of the Good Ones. Reusable rockets. Electric cars.

Now he's lowered himself to be one of Those People. People who help Trump, and pander to Trump supporters.

Well, the old days were nice but they are gone.

fwiw, I was not editorializing when submitting the headline. I just used the headline from the post I was linking to. I know hacker news sometimes rewrites headlines and remember thinking that they might decide to do that in this case, though I see that it has so far stayed the same.

with the rise of mastodon in the past week [1] I feel twitter is already yesterday's news. It serves no purpose. It has lost whatever cachet it had. The world of the Fediverse and ActivityPub and Mastodon and similar implementations is the final escape from walled gardens and the horses have already run out of the barn.

  1. https://nora.codes/post/scaling-mastodon-in-the-face-of-an-exodus/

I suppose the people still there must either be Elon fanboys, or have really limited options (e.g. in the country on a work visa).

I'm imagining a big tech company suddenly run by James Damores, rather than having a minority of them scattered about.

I don't hope the wheels stay on. I hope they come off, as a warning to anyone in the future considering acquiring an organization with the idea that its people are a small part of its value and can be cast out or easily replaced.