1,270 karma · joined February 5, 2009
BUUUUUT, since the internet is a dynamic medium, maybe they could offer a tiered pricing scheme (like every other for-pay web app these days) that includes a no ads option. It should be easy enough: just display the print version of the article.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/21/business/media/21times.htm...
The only con I've run into is when I have to use somebody else's computer, like during a presentation in a meeting and I end up basically hunting and pecking on Qwerty. I get looks like, "this guy is a developer?" One time when I explained I was a Dvorak keyboardist, a participant asked if I also spoke Esperanto. (I don't.)
However, I highly recommend the switch just for the brain-remapping experience. Going through the learning process literally feels like a mental rewiring.
That has to be incredibly difficult to adhere to, but doing so probably saves a ton of headaches.
I expect the ideas behind this direction aren't being handed down by Jason and David from on high, but rather came from employee feedback. They're probably still small enough to test out some of these ideas without doing damage, so I'm interested to see what comes out of it and what modifications they make and what we can learn from this.
An Apple tablet might meet the needs of most people as a radically simplified "media device" to the point that they don't need to buy a traditional computer.
On a side note, I believe there are a number of iPhone apps that implement this system.
But then this begs the question, why do the VC firms' web sites offer the ability to submit in the first place? How about an Amazon Mechanical Turk task to have people screen the proposals for them? Have the Turkers write a bullet point summary and give a thumbs up or down.
Working at a large company that's pretty invested in RDBMS, I'm curious to see where the downside of using something like MongoDB comes in. E.g. James Golick's creation of Friendly because they hit a scaling wall — how big do you have to get for it to become an issue?
This wasn't an issue with Gmail because it worked with all other email systems, whereas Wave is having to build its user base from the ground up.
I'm sure it's been discussed in numerous other threads, but is anyone genuinely using Wave for anything productive?
If you've written a PHP app, maybe it's a good candidate for rewriting in these languages. Having a problem space that you're intimately familiar with can reduce the variables to just the languages or frameworks themselves.
It wouldn't have to rely solely on digital distribution either… well-known authors or books that meritoriously rise above the rank and file could then be picked up by the remaining smart book publishers and given real print distribution for those who still like to show off their bookshelves. Sort of like people still buying vinyl even though they have the MP3s.
As we move beyond Web 2.0, I think this ability to [relatively] seamlessly connect disparate sites will become second nature to web users. It's possible that in a couple of years people will bristle at the need to create a new username and password for a site they want to use.
Ruby has also benefitted from folks like the Pragmatic Programmers quickly legitimizing it (and Rails) with a number of books, and you have to give the folks promoting Ruby and Rails a lot of credit for trying to tackle thorny problems (e.g. migrations, web services through ActiveResource, etc.) incrementally to build a platform that Enterprise is no longer afraid to adopt.
In summary: good implementation, excellent promotion & responsiveness to the market.
I finally started using Instapaper with my iPhone, and can't say how many times I've been stuck somewhere for a few minutes that let me read a longer-form article when I'd have been distracted by 5 other open browser tabs were I on my laptop.
Being able to click the Instapaper bookmarklet and not have to think about anything — not even be taken away from the page — has removed all friction from the process. I love it. I didn't even realize you could get a digest sent to your Kindle. I'm going to have to go set that up right now.
Now you shop on the Internet, and you can buy from anywhere on the planet.
The options for any particular purchase approach infinity, or so it seems.
So while you may get tons of ads offering to sell you something, how much effort is spent determining which is the best match for what you want. It would be better to get 5 results that are really close to what you're looking for than 500 that are sort of what you want.Pero, yo espero que Ángel no se traduce los posts sobre los Yankees. Puedo vivir sin ellos. :-P
So perhaps we can combine automation with an investigative human element to more efficiently achieve a better product?