gokulk

you should see impress.js.. thats another good one http://bartaz.github.com/impress.js/#/bored

Maybe performance was not their goal. Just a website like Amazon built on ActionScript. Ah the plot thickens

Yeah it does not appear to be a *required field but still throws an error. I say its bad design. Just right click and inspect and delete that input field parent.. =) class='all_plan_group_row' to be specific

'I'm kinda amazed that people perceive them as a "tech giant" along with Google, Facebook and Amazon ' err.. we are talking about Amazon here

I have never watched any of the video series. The books are classics at comedy. I wish 'Pigs have wings' is available on iBooks. Stories involving Bertie Wooster, Jeeves, Hon. Threepod etc.. are hilarious and make up a good lazy Sunday afternoon.

the layout still needs some work

e.g., the register box is off when not in standard resolution

show us some of your examples. would be interesting to compare between app styles and price difference in US and other countries

Oh God the recruiters. What types of Java Scripts do you know.

for god's sake .. add a nsfw tag for the auto generated pics ... not cool man

If this is a set of tutorials for new developers, it needs to be labeled

A bit confused with some tutorials going PHP, others going MySQL, the rest JavaScript.

I am waiting for the time when Indian IT finally lets go of Java for everything and embraces JS for a better user experience.

I find the ticket prices too high .. wonder if it just gets the prices from the vendor websites or has some special arrangement with them.

yes I use this at work. Another alternate is cake watch in CoffeeScript.

nice idea.. but it looks more like a class project :) .. would be great if you have more UI for selecting height of the tree, decorations etc... but its sure is simple and nice.

They actually have these in Google mountain view

yes I think that would be a much bigger advantage over their competitors

I use backbone.js, underscore.js etc.. heavily in my work. I primarily code in front end but I have only a year of mainstream experience. Where does that place me in this stack. I think this is the misconception recruiters are not picking me for junior/mid level positions and I get calls for senior level positions and then they drop me cause of less experience. backbone.js ! = more experience

I mean into spotlight and started appearing on production models

sorry for the late reply. I think probably cause it is out in the open, compared to methods by bigger tech companies like google where the user information is not passed in the url for reset password

We can see Apple typically releases any new technology a few years later. NFC came into mainstream only last year so it might take a few more years for it to be widely used for applications. Apple made a safe bet with passbook because all the store cards/tickets use similar bar codes or QR codes. A few startups have started on software/hardware lacking in Apple products but once the manufacturer integrates it into their product, they risk losing their purpose if they don't innovate. They integrated LTE after a few years it became mainstream. This will eventually happen too.

Apple is probably going to launch it in its next generation or the one after that... why would some one buy a 3rd party component after that.. I don't think anyone buys a bluetooth dongle for an iPhone just cause it lets them do more things...

serving users email as a GET request for reset password ?? intriguing...

yep. I guess that is what HTML5 is doing and Google is banking on it by making the ChromeBook.

I tried using this lib to make a self aware browser which can also serve requests to other browsers. but dropped it cause it didn't go well wit the sandbox model.

There was an article on front page just few days ago regarding banner blindness for scrolling carousel style content. HN gives conflicting views.

yeah me too. then i realized this would do for a web interface

A good UI engineer always gives an option to close any popup box or else users just close the window and dont return

$.ajax({ type: 'POST', url: "path/to/api", data: "banana=yellow", success: function (data) { alert("Success: " + data); }, });

can be written as

jQuery.post('path/to/api',{banana:yellow},function(data){alert("Success: "+data);});

much simpler and easy than

var r = new XMLHttpRequest(); r.open("POST", "path/to/api", true); r.onreadystatechange = function () { if (r.readyState != 4 || r.status != 200) return; alert("Success: " + r.responseText); }; r.send("banana=yellow");

nevermind got the joke. but i think jQuery helps write faster code sometimes